Lightning

2k1 stock height vs. 99-00

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 8, 2001 | 09:20 PM
  #1  
99svtlightning's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,365
Likes: 0
From: Elkton, MD
Post 2k1 stock height vs. 99-00

I just left the dragstrip tonight and another friend of mine with an 2000 L stated that he measured the distance of a brand new 2001 from inner fender to the ground and it was the same as his 2000. Anyone else notice this? I thought the 2k1's were dropped about 2 inches?



------------------
99 Lightning, JL Ram Air, Daiblo Chip(JL Programmed)and 90mm MAF,JL Power Cooler, Level 10 shift kit,PSP Lower pulley, Single Blade T/B, Bassani exhaust, . 12.42 at 109.6..Full trim and stock convertor, MT Street ET's.
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2001 | 09:40 PM
  #2  
Lightningquick's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,297
Likes: 0
From: New Hampshire
Post

ALL 99/00/01 are the same.
1.5 front (i think)or maybe .5 but I know its one or the other.
2.0 rear ( I know)

this from a stock f150

I know they are all the same and any variances are exactly that.....(variances)

[This message has been edited by Lightningquick (edited 06-08-2001).]
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2001 | 12:33 AM
  #3  
BfB's Avatar
BfB
Banned For Rules Violations
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,585
Likes: 0
From: Mobile, AL, USA
Post

everyone is thinking they '01s are lower, but they are not. the reason Ford states 2 inches lower in the rear and .5 in front is because they are comparing to a stock F150 as Lightningquick just stated above.

The main differences is the Bilstein shocks.

BfB
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2001 | 01:42 AM
  #4  
CBQB3's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Post

99 -- You would notice another 2 inches. That would be considered "slammed"


------------------
2000 Silver Lightning
#2798 of 4966
Born on date: May 9, 2000
Email: ColinMBurns@hotmail.com



Mods: SnugLid, 20% tint, Airaid, Slush Mats, Pioneer Speakers, Zaino

My Zing Album:
http://www.zing.com/album/?id=4292665015
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2001 | 08:55 AM
  #5  
twiztid's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: NC
Post

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by BfB:
everyone is thinking they '01s are lower, but they are not. the reason Ford states 2 inches lower in the rear and .5 in front is because they are comparing to a stock F150 as Lightningquick just stated above.

The main differences is the Bilstein shocks.

BfB
</font>
Right, but the 2001 Stock F-150 is lower than the previous years.

Mike



------------------

2001 Lightning
(Recv. Date 05/18/2001)

 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:28 AM.