Lightning

F-150 4X4 VS. LIGHTNING

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 30, 2001 | 06:47 AM
  #16  
Predator1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: St. Charles, Mo. USA
Post

2000 F-150 4X4 maybe i am reading the spec wrong but i thought the weight diff was only 71 pds--lightning curb wt=4670 and my 150 =4741. here you read them at:
http://www.ford-trucks.com/specs/2001_f150_1.html

and:
http://www.ford-trucks.com/specs/2001_lightning_1.html


mondo1 the holley does have an intercooler. i would have gotten a magnacharger if they didn't.
 
Reply
Old May 30, 2001 | 02:57 PM
  #17  
BlackLight's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 925
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver,BC,Canada
Post

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by REDHOTL:
Blacklight, I was under the impresion that the fractured connecting rods were stronger than the traditional style due to an exact fit. If it was pure cost issue wouldn't all motors have this setup? What would your opinion on the Lightning intercooler be? Helpful to the engine? Or does that come with the Holey supercharger as well? To me the Lightning is an engineered package that is put together in a cost effective fashion
that I think would be difficult to replicate at the same price. Just my opinion, anyone is free to try whatever they like.
</font>
The rods are not really stronger, just more precise and easier to make than a "traditional" conrod. And yes, all the 5.4 liter engines have these rods.

I think a intercooler in the middle of the V of a V8 is a very elegant idea. A leaking one is just shoddy engineering.

I agree, it would be impossible to put together at the price, and then you don't have factory warranty to back you up...
 
Reply
Old May 30, 2001 | 03:03 PM
  #18  
Silver-Y2K-SVT's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
From: Milford, Ohio USA
Post

How about the transmission on the 4x4? Is that a 4R70? Would it be able to take the torque of a heavily modded engine like that?

It seems like the 4R100 is marginal for the 'Bolt, and the 4x4 we're talking about here would be approaching Lightning power levels.
 
Reply
Old May 30, 2001 | 03:58 PM
  #19  
1998Nastruck's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Florissant MO, US
Post

Isn't the naming convention on those trannies supposed to equate to the 70w and 100w being able to handle 700 and 1000 ft lbs of torque respectivley?
 
Reply
Old May 30, 2001 | 04:04 PM
  #20  
Predator1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: St. Charles, Mo. USA
Post

Silver-y2k-svt
yup i think that maybe the weak side of the whole set-up and im sure it is a 4r70 because its a 139(138.8)wheel base and the 4r100 is on the 157(157.4)wheel base supercab 4x4. hope it can hold up, only because i won't be consistantly dragging everything in site(lol). guess i'll find out.

1998Nastruck

if it is maybe it will be ok--not going to have anything near 700# of torque(at least i don't think i will--lol)

[This message has been edited by Predator1 (edited 05-30-2001).]
 
Reply
Old May 30, 2001 | 04:14 PM
  #21  
alphadoggy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 0
From: Ventura, CA, USA
Angry

Actually, based on my experience, that 4R100 is built to withstand 100 lb./ft. of torque. That's got to be why Ford put in the power reduction during the 1-2 shift, 'cause without it my truck sure blew out those stock clutches in a hot second.

------------------
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.

'84 Alan Record Carbonio, Aerospoke wheels, Campy brakes.

'00 SVT Lightning, silver, built 2/9/00, #133 of 4966, G-tech Pro, JBA headers, 4.10 gears, Swanson chip, Pro-M, NGK plugs, carbon drive shaft, Roadmaster suspension kit, TransGo shift kit, cam bolts, Jackson washers, Wet Okoles, Kenyon transmission
13.39 @ 102.5

2001 Kevlacat 2400, twin 115 Evinrude FICHT, Raytheon VHF, radar, autopilot and GPS chartplotter/fishfinder.



gmvye@pacbell.net
 
Reply
Old May 30, 2001 | 10:36 PM
  #22  
Y2K 7700 4x4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 0
From: Kalamazoo, MI, USA
Post

100 lb./ft. of torque (lol)
 
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2001 | 07:47 PM
  #23  
Phil Marquis's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 25
Likes: 1
From: Decatur, Il.
Post

Actually, I believe the 4r70 is the wide ratio version of the AOD while the 4R100 is the wide ratio version of the E40D. The E4OD is very similar to a C6 with the overdrive and the pan is similarly shaped. I have the E4OD in my F250LD and as I understand in '99 or '00 you couldn't get that trans in the F150. They went back to the smaller 4r70.

When I purchased my truck, one of the criteria for my purchase was that it have the heavier transmission.

Phil
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:48 PM.