Lightning

01 L dyno results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 31, 2001 | 02:03 PM
  #1  
ACoder's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Gilbert, AZ, USA
Lightbulb 01 L dyno results

310. I knew the truck seemed a mite sluggish.

The guy said he was getting diminishing results w/ each run.

My buddy w/ a 300 ZX TT got 540. Oh yeah.

On the way over to the shop, I raced him from a light and took him easy, but I could see him fishtailing in the rearview.

Once he gets some traction, I'm toast.
 
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2001 | 02:36 PM
  #2  
JeffsLightning's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,367
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Post

310 is way too low AC....I hope you get another dyno...free of charge of course.

------------------
99.5 red Lightning
13.2@103
01 ordered on 3/17
hud@mc.net
 
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2001 | 03:42 PM
  #3  
lgogether's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Post

Depending on your mileage 310 might not be too bad; I made 327 with about 4000 miles on mine (99). I have a buddy that made 315 when his (00) had 1500 miles and now with the standard 3 bolt-on' he’s running 13.0 flat, and remember a 13.0 in Texas is probably a 12.7 - 12.8 up north where all the super runs are made in cold air. I think when you add a chip it evens things out a bit, especially if you have a custom one made.

I can’t speak for others but my truck feels like a dog above 80 degrees, maybe all Lightnings are the same?

If you already have 3000 miles or more I definitely would find another dyno.

I don’t think that dynos are all calibrated together in the real world. I believe some dynos are calibrated with a standard weight (??4000lbs???), if this is the case then how can you compare a 5000 lb fully loaded L with gas, driver, bald tires, and a slipping clutch/torque converter, ect… to the opposite, on maybe a completely different dyno type/manufacture?

I don’t know for a fact if these changes make a difference. I just think that this is a whole new set of variables to consider when we compare one dyno run in one part of the country, to another truck in another part.

I do think dynos are great to compare one change made to another, given all the conditions are basically the same.
 
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2001 | 04:07 PM
  #4  
Mark_2kL's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Camano Island, WA
Post

310 is way too low. Something's not right.

This is from today:

From a stock 2000 with leaking intercooler.

------------------
Mark
'00 Lightning
'79+ Corvette
 
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2001 | 06:16 PM
  #5  
ACoder's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Gilbert, AZ, USA
Post

I've got 1400 miles on it.

Also, the max torque was 365.
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2001 | 03:57 AM
  #6  
Tundra's Avatar
Rest In Peace
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,075
Likes: 0
From: anchorage, alaska, usa, north america, earth, solar system, milky way
Post

Yeah, I'd be concerned. 365 does not sound good at all. Maybe with more miles?
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2001 | 11:27 AM
  #7  
lgogether's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Post

ACoder,

At what RPM did you make 365 lb torque at.

I made 365 lbs at 4800 RPM, if you're making 365 lb at say 3000 RPM you're in real trouble, at 3000 RPMs I was making ~410 lbs.

Mark,

Can you post your dyno run with a RPM range? My dyno pull looks like your dyno pull but I made 10 RWHP less than yours. Funny I made a lot more torque than yours up to a point and then it's the same torque but you end up with more HP?????
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:15 PM.