2001 Dyno Results
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
From: Kent, WA
2001 Dyno Results
My first ever dyno-run, here are the results for my '01 L.
I might have been able to do a bit better because I only have 1400 miles on the bone-stock engine (it's not fully broken in yet), and I didn't kick down as hard as I could/should have.
http://www.zing.com/album/?id=4292823263
That's my truck on the dyno.
------------------
Black 2001 - Got boost?
http://www.teamon.com
[This message has been edited by Frans (edited 03-31-2001).]
[This message has been edited by Frans (edited 04-01-2001).]
I might have been able to do a bit better because I only have 1400 miles on the bone-stock engine (it's not fully broken in yet), and I didn't kick down as hard as I could/should have.
http://www.zing.com/album/?id=4292823263
That's my truck on the dyno.
------------------
Black 2001 - Got boost?
http://www.teamon.com
[This message has been edited by Frans (edited 03-31-2001).]
[This message has been edited by Frans (edited 04-01-2001).]
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
From: Allen, TX, USA
Good numbers. Definitely more power than a stock '99-00.
If you'd kicked it down a bit quicker, you'd see more peak TQ, but your HP will be the same as it occurs way after the fact.
------------------
Wes Tarbox
90 LX 5.0 (10.69 @ 134.7)--597rwhp/590rwtq
96 Cobra (12.34 @ 115.8)--392rwhp/433rwtq
99 Lightning (13.20 @ 103.8)--364rwhp/447rwtq
00 Expedition XLT 5.4
http://hometown.aol.com/wa2fst/home.htm
If you'd kicked it down a bit quicker, you'd see more peak TQ, but your HP will be the same as it occurs way after the fact.
------------------
Wes Tarbox
90 LX 5.0 (10.69 @ 134.7)--597rwhp/590rwtq
96 Cobra (12.34 @ 115.8)--392rwhp/433rwtq
99 Lightning (13.20 @ 103.8)--364rwhp/447rwtq
00 Expedition XLT 5.4
http://hometown.aol.com/wa2fst/home.htm
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
From: Kent, WA
That's correct (I didn't punch it as well as I could have), I could have done another run, but there were other guys waiting to go.
The beast sounded like a bloody cruise missile though!
The beast sounded like a bloody cruise missile though!
Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Warrington, Pennsylvania
Holy ****! Thats awesome! Are most Lightning's way underrated from the factory? Even w/ the upped HP rating of 380, thats still way less then you made.
Assuming only a 20% loss through the drivetrain (and we all know an auto. usually loses more then 20%,) your HP at the crank would be:
HP: 406.2
Torque: 478.3
I am so stoaked about my Lightning now!
------------------
2001 Lightning, Red
Stock right now, but not for long.
"See the Light and hear the Thunder."
Assuming only a 20% loss through the drivetrain (and we all know an auto. usually loses more then 20%,) your HP at the crank would be:
HP: 406.2
Torque: 478.3
I am so stoaked about my Lightning now!
------------------
2001 Lightning, Red
Stock right now, but not for long.
"See the Light and hear the Thunder."
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
From: Kent, WA
These figures have also take barometric conditions and temperature into consideration.
I had a blast out there and saw about 7 other Lightnings -- all at once!
I had a blast out there and saw about 7 other Lightnings -- all at once!
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
From: Round Rock, TX
Last weekend there was a dyno day here in Dallas and 11 trucks showed up, top truck dyno'd in at 396hp and 463 torque...
Go check out the details at:
http://www.svtlightnings.com/talon/dyno/dynofastech.htm
Cool stuff.
Logan
99 White Lightning
69 Mercury Cougar
Go check out the details at:
http://www.svtlightnings.com/talon/dyno/dynofastech.htm
Cool stuff.
Logan
99 White Lightning
69 Mercury Cougar