Lightning

Dyno numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 10:51 PM
  #1  
Sharpshooter's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Dyno numbers



Mods:
JDM Longblock
Whipple (8lb lower 3" upper) ~ 20 psi
JDM street tune + 2 degrees using the X-Cal =14 degrees of timing
Dyna tech Headers
Catless Midpipe
Stock Cat-back
Supporting Fuel mods.

Temp-76 F Humidity-48%

This was the 2nd Run. The first was 5 minutes before this one, and netted 599.84 RWHP. Both runs were made imediately after a failed dyno attempt due to a downshift. So the truck was hot. This is a mail order tune from JDM to get me by until I can make it up to N.J. early next year. Hopefully next year I can be added to the long list of 10 second JDM trucks
 

Last edited by Sharpshooter; Dec 22, 2006 at 12:15 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2006 | 06:55 AM
  #2  
AustinSVT's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: TXSVTLIGHTNING
awsome! how much $ do you have into this engine package?
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2006 | 08:16 AM
  #3  
scv8's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: GA
Congrats! Is this on pump gas?
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2006 | 10:18 AM
  #4  
afchad's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 902
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Good numbers!!!!
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2006 | 10:44 AM
  #5  
01Diablo's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: s. florida
Nice numbers
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2006 | 11:18 AM
  #6  
Rob_99Lightning's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiice

CONGRATS and WOO HOO!!! got to love these big *** Superchargers
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2006 | 12:15 PM
  #7  
pitstain's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 0
From: HOMELESS
I just wish it wasnt so dammed ugly, I have no choice but to go whipple when i upgrade.....maybe by the time i do theylll have the 3.3 available.
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Dec 22, 2006 | 05:07 PM
  #8  
Sharpshooter's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Thanks guys.

Originally Posted by scv8
Congrats! Is this on pump gas?
I mixed 114 with 93 just for peace of mind.
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2006 | 11:07 PM
  #9  
NCsvt2003L's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville, NC
Nice numbers, pushing the boost a little on the fuel mix? Turn up the timing and go C-16 and see what she puts out!
 
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2006 | 10:02 AM
  #10  
Rob_99Lightning's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by pitstain
I just wish it wasnt so dammed ugly, I have no choice but to go whipple when i upgrade.....
maybe by the time i do theylll have the 3.3 available.

Lets face it the L engine compartment was never know for looks (either is a Stangs compartment for that matter).
Since I drive with the hood closed to tell you the truth I dont give a rats *** what it looks like under there
Putting down 589.23 / 686.62 STD with only 10lbs of boost (due to that slipping belt issue we had,
NOW FIXED) on 93 Octane pump gas tells me this KB can hold it's own......

For the record I agree the Whipple looks Better, but both SC's seem to put down equal HP on the same set up,
(I also have a 8lb lower and 3" upper). I think it's AWESOME to have multi options to Bolt on MASSIVE HP now.
Plus some race only trucks may opt for the KB "H" Model (15lbs Min Boost recommended) 50 HP over my model
Their priced the same (KB maybe a little cheaper) and the KB seem to have more Tq, it's good to have choices
NO REASON FOR WARS AND BASHING....

All I know is putting down equal #'s with Sharpshooter's Beast here has me all excited.
Congrats again Sharpshooter isnt it AWESOME to have this kind of insane power on a street tune
 
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2006 | 10:55 AM
  #11  
Sharpshooter's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Ronnie,
I had the octane around ~ 104, no sign of detonation. I plan on getting a C-16 tune when I get a dyno tune. Hoping for some mid 600 numbers.

Originally Posted by Rob_99Lightning
: isnt it AWESOME to have this kind of insane power on a street tune
It sure is. On the street I will be running a bigger upper with around 15psi. It seems useless to have over 675 ft/lb's on drag radials.
 
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2006 | 11:32 AM
  #12  
Rob_99Lightning's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
I hear you I can rip my DR's lose up to @ 60MPH if I stab it
I already bought a new Upper for mine and planned to pull 5lbs of Boost also
(bought a 3.5" upper). Sal tried to swap pulleys for me last weekend but my stock upper wont come off, we even snapped a hardened steel Snap On Socket trying (@$^%(@$@)$%@$)%@$

I dont know if it'll ever come off but I'm having A LOT of fun as it is I'm using it pretty much everyday now and enjoying the schitt out of it, maybe once the snow hits I'll send it in to have the pulley removed. I too want the option to be able to swap pulleys, as you said having @700 ft lbs of tq at such low RPM is outright tire ripping and makes it pretty dam impossible to get on it except for in OD (and then only if you do it slow and steady)......
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 12:40 AM
  #13  
madferraristi's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 1
From: Newark,CA
IMO, the limit for street tires is somewher in the high 500's. Anything more than that and you have to be damn careful.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:18 PM.