Lightning

Mannnnnn !!!! Look At This Thing !!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 11:32 PM
  #1  
rafa26's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 0
From: hatboro-pa
Mannnnnn !!!! Look At This Thing !!!

http://kennebell.net/index.htm
 
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 02:57 AM
  #2  
The Swede's Avatar
TRUCK OF THE YEAR - 2010
Truck of the Month
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
From: Sweden
Very sexy !

 
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 04:31 AM
  #3  
Peacemaker's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 0
The L 2.6L SC

http://kennebell.net/superchargers/f...ting54_26L.htm
 
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 09:19 AM
  #4  
typhoon43's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, FL.
*First 2 tests were with stock inlet system. All other tests with 4” Kenne Bell Bazooka Dyno Tube (no filter) using dyno room air. SAE corrected. A big oval throttle body was also used to negate any HP losses from inlet restriction at high rpm. Throttle body made “0” HP gain up to 450HP.
for the love of buddha, WHY do they do tests like this??
"Hey, let's use the stock intake for the Eaton runs, then slap a 4 inch bellmouth tube right in front of the dyno fan with no filter for the KB test".

APPLES TO APPLES YOU BAST!RDS!!!
 

Last edited by typhoon43; Aug 3, 2006 at 09:27 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 10:53 AM
  #5  
Tim Skelton's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,928
Likes: 1
From: The People's Republic of Los Angeles
The third test establishes the Eaton baseline.

Also, the fact that KB shaded the first two tests, as well as put an * after the HP number, is a clear sign that they consider them to be somewhat non-representative.

My problem is that Jim Bell keeps telling us not to use open filters, but does not offer an alternative.
 
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 11:13 AM
  #6  
l-menace's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,097
Likes: 0
From: DETROIT, (formerly Eaton County, Michigan)
One could use the "volant" CAI... it is a sealed unit with a conical filter.



Hmmm If I'm at ~450/550 I wonder what I'd gain by slapping this monster on?


Now THE question is this:

DO A SIDE BY SIDE COMPARISON WITH THE WHIPPLEAND WHAT WOULD THE RESULTS BE?
 
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 11:42 AM
  #7  
Struck in AZ's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 6
From: Cave Creek, AZ


Nice zip ties...that's a clean look!
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Aug 3, 2006 | 12:15 PM
  #8  
MISTERgadget's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,660
Likes: 0
From: Miami / NYC
Originally Posted by Tim Skelton
My problem is that Jim Bell keeps telling us not to use open filters, but does not offer an alternative.
Wouldn't a 4" filterless "bazooka tube" not be an open filter?

btw... that "exclusive" valet mode... my truck with the stock eaton had a valet mode using the stock bypass valve. All it took was some tune changes with my SCT chip.
 

Last edited by MISTERgadget; Aug 3, 2006 at 12:18 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 12:18 PM
  #9  
Eds 01 Lightnin's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
From: Metro Atlanta
Personally, I like the looks of the Whipple much better!!
 
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 03:04 PM
  #10  
britincali's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
I think the new KBs are fugly.
 
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 03:06 PM
  #11  
rafa26's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 0
From: hatboro-pa
Originally Posted by britincali
I think the new KBs are fugly.
Hp is what matters, i wanna know if the 2.6 produces more Hp than the Whipple 2.3.
 
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 06:26 PM
  #12  
jackal 2's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: berwyn IL.
Whisper quiet. No embarrassing gear noise.
• Internally lubricated. No tapping holes in oil pan. Doesn’t use - and heat up - engine oil.
• Oversize bearings and shafts.
• 4 minute easy pulley changes.
• No “boost drop off” at higher rpm.
• Does not depend on engine rpm to generate boost.
• Lower gears not necessary.
• 60°-80° cooler air charge temp and requires less HP to drive than Eaton.
• Billet bypass valve.
• Available in black satin or polished.

does that mean no sweet supercharger whine.
 
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 08:25 PM
  #13  
todd abbott's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
From: Milford Connecticut
I can tell you around town my Whipple is louder than the Eaton, at full throttle no contest the Eaton is far louder.
 
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 09:10 PM
  #14  
rafa26's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 0
From: hatboro-pa
Originally Posted by todd abbott
I can tell you around town my Whipple is louder than the Eaton, at full throttle no contest the Eaton is far louder.
What do you prefer be the 2nd with noise ? Or be the 1st quietly ?
 
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 11:38 PM
  #15  
RGCBSHRTY#1's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: San Marcos
According to KB's data it appears at 15psi the 2.6 made much the same hp/tq as the 2.3. This leads me to believe the 2.6's full potential won't be realized until higher boost levels are run.

Run all three at the same given boost levels - 10, 12, 14psi etc. The results could have been more useful for the average customer. Running the same size pulley on all doesn't help me in deciding what is best for my application.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:19 AM.