Lightning

NEW 2.6 KB Super Charger!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 23, 2006 | 11:12 PM
  #31  
JohnnyLightning's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,141
Likes: 0
From: lancaster,pa. usa
Wow thats great you can buy a 2.6 KB and get the performance of a 2.3 Whipple!! man thats awesome!!

I don't believe the 2.6 KB has been tested or even released yet. So where do you come up with its the same as a 2.3 whipple? But i'm going to put my $$ on the 2.6 KB over the 2.3 Whipple i'll take a guess 40-50 hp! more @ the same boost levels.. JL
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2006 | 11:25 PM
  #32  
Scott Dunn's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
From: Olathe KS.
Originally Posted by JohnnyLightning
Wow thats great you can buy a 2.6 KB and get the performance of a 2.3 Whipple!! man thats awesome!!

I don't believe the 2.6 KB has been tested or even released yet. So where do you come up with its the same as a 2.3 whipple? But i'm going to put my $$ on the 2.6 KB over the 2.3 Whipple i'll take a guess 40-50 hp! more @ the same boost levels.. JL
Same place you came up with your 40-50 hp!
 
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2006 | 12:22 AM
  #33  
SILVERLIGHTNING's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
From: SouthJerseyUSA
Scott: You crack me up
John: You asked for that one


That aside.... This is a hot item.
Choice is good.
Competition in the marketplace is great for the consumer.
It will be interesting to watch this develop


 
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2006 | 03:21 AM
  #34  
mac02lightning's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: sfla
Originally Posted by Mondo1
Yea.....I do believe he meant it takes 5 minutes to unbolt the intake on the whipple BEFORE the actual plug change. Hey,Tony. Hows your built motor coming?
Its coming
 
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2006 | 08:16 AM
  #35  
SVT F15O's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,472
Likes: 0
From: Shelton, Connecticut
Originally Posted by Scott Dunn
Wow thats great you can buy a 2.6 KB and get the performance of a 2.3 Whipple!! man thats awesome!!
 
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2006 | 11:37 AM
  #36  
El Diablo's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Fresno
I just got talking to guy in another forum, he made 585HP with 14psi which made 30 more HP than the KB at 2psi less, So I guess the 2.6 might be able to make it to the 585 mark with 16PSI, But I would still like to know if autorotor is coming back out with this or is KB doing it himself because liek I said before they tried this compressor 5 years ago never worked out so they discontinued it
 
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2006 | 12:02 PM
  #37  
NCsvt2003L's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville, NC
Originally Posted by El Diablo
I just got talking to guy in another forum, he made 585HP with 14psi which made 30 more HP than the KB at 2psi less, So I guess the 2.6 might be able to make it to the 585 mark with 16PSI, But I would still like to know if autorotor is coming back out with this or is KB doing it himself because liek I said before they tried this compressor 5 years ago never worked out so they discontinued it
Read this post:https://www.f150online.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=228940

It should answer a lot of questions about superchargers.
 
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2006 | 12:06 PM
  #38  
El Diablo's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Fresno
I know allot about superchargers, I'm just trying to figure out why all of a sudden the 2.6 is coming out when it was discontinued, Than also Im going with the Whipple 2.3 because of their customer service and also everytime Ive tried calling KB nobody answers the phone and the customer service is terrible. Also a local guy here had one in warranty and KB never helped him out with replacing it and they told him that he needed to pay for a new compressor.
The whipple system has a few advantages. First, the compressor is an axial entry compressor vs. Bell's radial entry. The axial entry is a rear entry and the rotors are encased and seal 360deg around the casing. This design has a higher efficiency rate which means the compressor can produce more air per rpm vs. a lesser efficient style.Whipple typically have 1-2lbs of more boost than Bell's kit with the same compressor speeds. This benefits temperature and parasatic losses which allows for more power to the rear wheels.
 

Last edited by El Diablo; Feb 24, 2006 at 12:12 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2006 | 12:56 PM
  #39  
NCsvt2003L's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville, NC
Originally Posted by El Diablo
I know allot about superchargers, I'm just trying to figure out why all of a sudden the 2.6 is coming out when it was discontinued, Than also Im going with the Whipple 2.3 because of their customer service and also everytime Ive tried calling KB nobody answers the phone and the customer service is terrible. Also a local guy here had one in warranty and KB never helped him out with replacing it and they told him that he needed to pay for a new compressor.
The whipple system has a few advantages. First, the compressor is an axial entry compressor vs. Bell's radial entry. The axial entry is a rear entry and the rotors are encased and seal 360deg around the casing. This design has a higher efficiency rate which means the compressor can produce more air per rpm vs. a lesser efficient style.Whipple typically have 1-2lbs of more boost than Bell's kit with the same compressor speeds. This benefits temperature and parasatic losses which allows for more power to the rear wheels.
The 2.6 is coming out due to competition. Also, the price on the 2.3 KB has dropped to 2599 vs almost 4000 for the Whipple. Now each have their pro and cons in which you can read in my post. I own both, so nothing here for me to hide behind. Now for the 15 PSI test, the KB made more power if even a little bit and yes with the JLP Plenum. That is fact. Take it for what it was worth. As far as customer service, both have good customer service, but I will say that it did take a long time for the Whipple to come out.
 
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2006 | 01:34 PM
  #40  
Cali L's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
I must say after reading all the opinionated posts on both sides of the fence (3 actually with the Magnum) concerning aftermarket superchargers, this post is refreshing. Finally someone who isn't biased, giving honest results and staying open minded when the haters start to chime in. When I finally decide to buy one of these in an attempt to grenade my tank, this post will play huge dividends. Thanks NCsvt2003L. Stay strong bro

BD
 
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2006 | 02:24 PM
  #41  
Spanky99L's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by JohnnyLightning
Also once whipple does the 3.3 how is KB going to compete with that?

The 2.6 KB will be a direct fit! thats going to be 1 of the big differences between the 2.6 & 3.3. I know how HUGE this 2.6 is, i just can't even image how that 3.3 is going to fit without some serious modifying..I'm sure this 2.6 will produce more than enough power for even the die hard racer! and price i'm sure will be a playing factor also! JL
we shall see very shortly

Originally Posted by NCsvt2003L

Now for the 15 PSI test, the KB made more power if even a little bit and yes with the JLP Plenum. That is fact. Take it for what it was worth. As far as customer service, both have good customer service, but I will say that it did take a long time for the Whipple to come out.
that was one test. forget the other 10+ dynos that have been shown with the whipple putting down more power with less boost. the kb freaks find 1 dyno that goes their way and the other ones mean absolutley nothing

Also i'm sure we'll see it in 2 weeks

Will
 

Last edited by Spanky99L; Feb 24, 2006 at 03:10 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2006 | 02:32 PM
  #42  
El Diablo's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Fresno
That's a great post , also if was running 15PSI and whipple was running 14psi shouldn't make more power hmmmmmmmm, Also didn't they do a test somehwere and it should the KB 2.4 actually flows like his 2.2 cant member where I saw this at I will try and find it. Sorry but hearing all the numbers whipple is making with the 2.3 and only running 14psi making more power I have made my choice and going with WHIPPLE
 
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2006 | 02:38 PM
  #43  
1badazzavt's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
lets not ignore the cobra scenarios. theyve played out in whipples favore more than even 10 times.
 
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2006 | 02:57 PM
  #44  
SVT F15O's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,472
Likes: 0
From: Shelton, Connecticut
Originally Posted by Spanky99L
we shall see very shortly



that was one test. forget the other 10+ dynos that have been shown with the whipple putting down more power with less boost. the kb freaks find 1 dyno that goes their way and the other ones that don't mean absolutley nothing

Also i'm sure we'll see it in 2 weeks

Will
Where are these other 10+ dyno posts>??? I know I haven't seen them, but I also haven't been looking.....
 
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2006 | 02:59 PM
  #45  
35thPony's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Awesome people can get a 2.2 KB for $1,300 less than the 2.3 whipple and get the same results in the 14#-18# range, which is where 95% of us are...
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:50 PM.