What a joke!
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, Fl
What a joke!
With that much HP and TQ @ the rear wheels you think his ET would be better then that. I have much less HP/TQ and have better time then he does. I guess it goes to show that power without traction an't sh_t! 
628 Rear Wheel HP
626 Rear Wheel Torque
12.40 sec
http://www.seanhylandmotorsport.com/..._rides_2.shtml
628 Rear Wheel HP
626 Rear Wheel Torque
12.40 sec
http://www.seanhylandmotorsport.com/..._rides_2.shtml
Last edited by LightningToGo; Jan 17, 2006 at 09:05 PM.
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,928
Likes: 1
From: The People's Republic of Los Angeles
Originally Posted by afchad
George.....I don't care how many turbos you put on a tank....it will be still slower than sh$t 
Car owners probably say that about us.Imagine how quickly we could go with 1,000 pounds or so dropped. It's all relative.
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,519
Likes: 0
From: Greater Boston
hmm
i was always under the impression that SHM was only into Ford Products. Guess I was wrong. I've driven the quad cab. Not as quick off the line but it pulls like a ****!!!
I just went to SHM's page from the link. They can stick that Tremec TKO 600 they put in that stang up there ***!!!! Talk about a company that don't back their products. I'd never buy or recommend another Tremec product again. This is a whole other story though!!!!
I just went to SHM's page from the link. They can stick that Tremec TKO 600 they put in that stang up there ***!!!! Talk about a company that don't back their products. I'd never buy or recommend another Tremec product again. This is a whole other story though!!!!
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 0
From: Port Royal, SC
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 1
From: SE Mich
I honestly don't understand why so many people *hate* others brands?
Yes you and I made a better choice for our dollar... but why so harshly bash others?
Same goes for ricers IMO. It's not something parked in my driveway.. but I don't feel the need backed by ignorance and pride to show hatered towards others?
Rich
Yes you and I made a better choice for our dollar... but why so harshly bash others?
Same goes for ricers IMO. It's not something parked in my driveway.. but I don't feel the need backed by ignorance and pride to show hatered towards others?
Rich
. Thats not even remotly close to what they run stock........................
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: NPR FLA
Originally Posted by halcyon
I thought bone stock SRT-10 quad cabs run low 14s at the track???
From Car and Driver....
The Quad Cab's 5.6-second 0-to-60 time was 0.7 second slower than the regular cab's, and the quarter-mile was 0.6 second off at 14.2 seconds.
with that gear ratio in my truck.....traction would be a BIG problem
Dodge Ram SRT-10 Quad Cab was fitted with a 4.56 gear ratio to improve launch feel
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
That 12.40 was also with a 117mph trap speed. With a set of slicks that's good for well into the 11s. Not bad for a 5,300# truck with an auto.
Now saying that, it still does not have the mph for a truck with 620/620 at the rear. I'd say the dyno #s are a hair inflated or just very peaky.
Now saying that, it still does not have the mph for a truck with 620/620 at the rear. I'd say the dyno #s are a hair inflated or just very peaky.