Lightning

intake hp Q

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 06:58 PM
  #1  
svtdemon's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: folsom,la.
intake hp Q

i just got the aem brute force intake for my 01 lightning does anyone know how much hp i gained
 
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 07:25 PM
  #2  
Suavy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,840
Likes: 0
From: Bridgeport, MI
I never heard of it?

Peace,

Suavy
 
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 07:26 PM
  #3  
mike00L's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
From: jersey
-5hp lol
 
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 10:14 PM
  #4  
LAGAININ04's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: San Clemente, CA
See the attached PDF I got off the AEM company website. They claim the following:

Largest Gain: 21.7 hp @ 2500 RPM and 37.4 ft-lbs @ 2500 RPM

I have the Brute Force. I haven't run on a dyno so don't know what I'm running. I do know though it sounds and looks great.

http://www.theroadrunner.com/lightning/aem.pdf


Jeff
 
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 10:30 PM
  #5  
LightningTuner's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 5,438
Likes: 1
From: Palm Coast, FL
Be careful with that intake. It actually replaces the MAF and alters it. I've seen lots of trucks have problems with that setup, if you don't have a tune to correct for it.
 
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 10:34 PM
  #6  
Robert Francis's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
From: SE Michigan
There's all kinds of "claims" in the adverstising for the "intake kits" from all the suppliers - unless you've got several modifications that require more "air" or your original stock airbox had a clogged filter - about top of line hp pickup might be 4-5hp - maybe.
 
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 10:37 PM
  #7  
Robert Francis's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
From: SE Michigan
Pay attention to what "Sal says:" he's usually right on!
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jul 8, 2005 | 11:50 PM
  #8  
l-menace's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,097
Likes: 0
From: DETROIT, (formerly Eaton County, Michigan)
Originally Posted by LightningTuner
Be careful with that intake. It actually replaces the MAF and alters it. I've seen lots of trucks have problems with that setup, if you don't have a tune to correct for it.
I was just going to say that...
 
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2005 | 12:12 AM
  #9  
Fast95Z's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: midwest
How does it alter it? It is identical to the stock one.
 
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 02:07 AM
  #10  
OD1010's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
i have the brute force intake and a bassani catback and mid pipes on my 03, i have never had a problem with the intake and i just got dynoed today and it read 370hp and 443tq at the wheels.
 
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 02:25 AM
  #11  
Spanky99L's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
do you reuse your stock MAF electronics? if so you are running 80 or 90mm electronics in a larger tube diameter tube thus not getting a correct reading of incoming air thus running lean.

Will
 
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 02:31 AM
  #12  
Fast95Z's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: midwest
Originally Posted by Spanky99L
do you reuse your stock MAF electronics? if so you are running 80 or 90mm electronics in a larger tube diameter tube thus not getting a correct reading of incoming air thus running lean.

Will
wrong. it is the same 90mm diameter as the stock piece.
 
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 03:05 AM
  #13  
Spanky99L's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by Fast95Z
wrong. it is the same 90mm diameter as the stock piece.
well it looks like you need to relearn your metric system conversions. aem advertises a complete 4 inch intake tube. do your conversion to mm and it comes out to 101.6mm. way larger than stock.

Will
 
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 03:16 AM
  #14  
Fast95Z's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: midwest
Originally Posted by Spanky99L
well it looks like you need to relearn your metric system conversions. aem advertises a complete 4 inch intake tube. do your conversion to mm and it comes out to 101.6mm. way larger than stock.

Will
I have the intake and I measured it along with put the stock one up to it and took pics of it. Despite what you may have read or heard it is wrong. They are identical. Both are 90mm. Also show me where AEM says it's a 4" pipe. It's certainly not on their site.
 
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 04:59 PM
  #15  
Spanky99L's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by Fast95Z
I have the intake and I measured it along with put the stock one up to it and took pics of it. Despite what you may have read or heard it is wrong. They are identical. Both are 90mm. Also show me where AEM says it's a 4" pipe. It's certainly not on their site.
AEM Intake

read 4 inch massive piping

Will
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:28 AM.