Lightning

I need help on physics ????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 12, 2005 | 03:19 PM
  #1  
Boostin01L's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville,Fl
I need help on physics ????

Suppose you could get a rim and tire combo that is the same weight but almost 2 inches narrower than the stock tires. Would this have any benefit over the stock setup?


I have 2 rims and tires off a F150 regular that have 235/60/16 tires. I just weighed these and the stock setup on an 04 L and it was the same weight BUT it was 2 inches narrower.

Would it be a smart move to change these out at the track on the fronts for less rotating mass?
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2005 | 03:28 PM
  #2  
Bootbox's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: TX
The less rubber on the road up front, the less rolling resistance.

Ideally, you want the front tires to be lighter and more narrow. But, with your setup you'd at least have the narrow part.
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2005 | 03:38 PM
  #3  
lurker's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
From: Plymouth, MI
Re: I need help on physics ????

Originally posted by Boostin01L
Suppose you could get a rim and tire combo that is the same weight but almost 2 inches narrower than the stock tires. Would this have any benefit over the stock setup?

I have 2 rims and tires off a F150 regular that have 235/60/16 tires. I just weighed these and the stock setup on an 04 L and it was the same weight BUT it was 2 inches narrower.

Would it be a smart move to change these out at the track on the fronts for less rotating mass?
You're right in looking at the rotating portion of the wheels/tires. The key is where the mass is located. The further out from the center the mass is, the more rotating inertia the wheel/tire has.

Even with the same overall weight, I would guess the 16 inch combo is the better choice for you.
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2005 | 07:47 PM
  #4  
EnglishAdam's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
From: Houston and Lil ol' England
You said narrower but what about the diameter?
A smaller diameter will allow you to stage a bit deeper which will cut your track time.
The only real way to find out is to make some passes with them and see if you are faster.
Just as a safety tip, make sure they are the correct speed rating for an L if they came off a regular truck.
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2005 | 08:33 PM
  #5  
Boostin01L's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville,Fl
Thanks guys I guess I will take it and find out for sure.
I just need them rated for at least 120mph I am not going any faster I am sure!!

I'll report the findings once I go to the track.
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 12:16 AM
  #6  
Slick_Sammy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Originally posted by EnglishAdam
You said narrower but what about the diameter?
A smaller diameter will allow you to stage a bit deeper which will cut your track time.
The only real way to find out is to make some passes with them and see if you are faster.
Just as a safety tip, make sure they are the correct speed rating for an L if they came off a regular truck.
uh, i think you have it backwards. staging deeper may help reduce reaction time but wil increase ETs. you get a "running start" so to speak, when you stage more shallow.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:19 AM.