Is A Aftermarket Heat Exchanger A Good Mod For A Mostly Street Truck?
Originally posted by Tim Skelton
The marginal cost of an upsized HE would be minimal (remember, it's just the extra cost of a larger unit that we are talking about, not its total cost). Maybe not $10, but certainly nowhere near $150.
A low-volume fix would have a low total price of implementation, so the expense would be just as justified on a per-unit basis as the same fix on a high-volume product (accepting perhaps some slight economies of scale from buying or making 5,000 widgets versus 500,000 widgets).
The marginal cost of an upsized HE would be minimal (remember, it's just the extra cost of a larger unit that we are talking about, not its total cost). Maybe not $10, but certainly nowhere near $150.
A low-volume fix would have a low total price of implementation, so the expense would be just as justified on a per-unit basis as the same fix on a high-volume product (accepting perhaps some slight economies of scale from buying or making 5,000 widgets versus 500,000 widgets).
Originally posted by Master Of Pain
The stock unit gets the job done for the stock vehicle, bottom line.
The stock unit gets the job done for the stock vehicle, bottom line.
Originally posted by halcyon
I bet they can help engine and s/c longevity <-- however that is spelled
Like a turbo timer for a turbocharged may extend the life of a turbo.
I bet they can help engine and s/c longevity <-- however that is spelled
Like a turbo timer for a turbocharged may extend the life of a turbo.
Hank,
If I'm reading your question correctly, you are looking for before and after IAT2 readings in daily driven scenarios in an effort to justify the expense.
You are not alone in this quest for data.
Bob
If I'm reading your question correctly, you are looking for before and after IAT2 readings in daily driven scenarios in an effort to justify the expense.
You are not alone in this quest for data.
Bob
Milage increase? Yeah right... say I gotta bridge for sale. Anybody interested?
In stop and go driving (w/o HE fans turned on) the IC fluid temps will be nearly identical after about 15 minutes of slow speed driving.
The real benfiet to a more efficient HE will occur when large amounts of heat are transfered into the coolant via the blower. Drag racing for a 1/4 at a time really won't put that much heat into the system. Road racing would. Also when parked in the pits after a run (w/fans ablaze) you'll see a mild decrease in time it takes to remove heat.
IMO a ice filled type of exchanger and some fans down on the stock HE is a far better bang for the buck.
But what do I know?... Rich
In stop and go driving (w/o HE fans turned on) the IC fluid temps will be nearly identical after about 15 minutes of slow speed driving.
The real benfiet to a more efficient HE will occur when large amounts of heat are transfered into the coolant via the blower. Drag racing for a 1/4 at a time really won't put that much heat into the system. Road racing would. Also when parked in the pits after a run (w/fans ablaze) you'll see a mild decrease in time it takes to remove heat.
IMO a ice filled type of exchanger and some fans down on the stock HE is a far better bang for the buck.
But what do I know?... Rich
Last edited by wydopnthrtl; May 11, 2005 at 12:22 PM.
Originally posted by wydopnthrtl
IMO a ice filled type of exchanger and some fans down on the stock HE is a far better bang for the buck.
But what do I know?... Rich
IMO a ice filled type of exchanger and some fans down on the stock HE is a far better bang for the buck.
But what do I know?... Rich
Originally posted by Speedin Bob
. . . you are looking for before and after IAT2 readings in daily driven scenarios in an effort to justify the expense.
You are not alone in this quest for data. . .
. . . you are looking for before and after IAT2 readings in daily driven scenarios in an effort to justify the expense.
You are not alone in this quest for data. . .
Shhhhhhhhh.... The vendors are trying to keep that info secret..
I have no hidden agenda other than to share what little I know.
Rich
Originally posted by wydopnthrtl
I hear ya.. but really they are just trying to make a living with the best they know. Or I should say most of them.
I have no hidden agenda other than to share what little I know.
Rich
I hear ya.. but really they are just trying to make a living with the best they know. Or I should say most of them.
I have no hidden agenda other than to share what little I know.
Rich
-Mark
Supply and demand.
I went looking for HE fans and found them cheaper elsewhere. Does'nt take but a few minutes on the net to realize many other automotive niche markets are into small fans too. Same thing with generic shaped ice boxes.
But... go try to find a Lightning specific highly efficient HE. You won't. Supply and demand at work in America.
There are some things even I don't want to mess with though. (and will pay though the nose for) My flex-a-lite e-fan comes to mind.
Rich
I went looking for HE fans and found them cheaper elsewhere. Does'nt take but a few minutes on the net to realize many other automotive niche markets are into small fans too. Same thing with generic shaped ice boxes.
But... go try to find a Lightning specific highly efficient HE. You won't. Supply and demand at work in America.
There are some things even I don't want to mess with though. (and will pay though the nose for) My flex-a-lite e-fan comes to mind.
Rich
This morning I was testing out the data logging capablilities of the new Preditor Revision software and noticed the intake temps.
With a KB and the old JDM Fluidyne Heat Exchanger the IAT temp was 76 degrees and IAT2 was 99 degrees cruising at 70 mph.
I have a FastAir kit so the IAT temp at 76 degrees pretty much matched the ambient outside temp that was showing on my overhead.
With a KB and the old JDM Fluidyne Heat Exchanger the IAT temp was 76 degrees and IAT2 was 99 degrees cruising at 70 mph.
I have a FastAir kit so the IAT temp at 76 degrees pretty much matched the ambient outside temp that was showing on my overhead.


