SRT-10 Quad Cab performance data
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 925
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver,BC,Canada
SRT-10 Quad Cab performance data
So you can win those meaningless bench racing sessions...
SRT-10 Quad Cab
1/4 mile: 15.29 sec at 92.06 mph
SRT-10 Quad Cab
1/4 mile: 15.29 sec at 92.06 mph
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles and San Luis Obispo
yea those number seem off, they seem more like the 5.7 Hemi numbers rather than the srt-10, with 500 hp im sure it will run close to us, so 14's for sure.
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: Alberta, Canada
Why worry abought the silly dodge? 2 extra cylinders and bigger displacement dose not make it better. The lightning is heads down a better performing truck, life dose not allways = 0 to 60 mph or how fast you can go in a quatermile, a stock 5.7 hemi will out performe a stock 5.4 3v, I don't beleave the Ram is better, but hands down I would take a lightning over a SRT10, I whish ford had supercharged the 04 5.4,
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 11,153
Likes: 0
From: Selden NY
I've said it once I'll say it again
I am NOT a pick up truck kind-of-guy,
and I DO NOT think of the Lightning as a Pick Up Truck
Now this is a Truck
AND THIS IS A WORK OF ART
some day...............................
I am NOT a pick up truck kind-of-guy,
and I DO NOT think of the Lightning as a Pick Up Truck
Now this is a Truck
AND THIS IS A WORK OF ART
some day...............................
Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: GA
still faster then this thing. http://www.pickuptruck.com/html/2005...est/page1.html
i see why there will be no lightning. cant get around the 5k weight.
i see why there will be no lightning. cant get around the 5k weight.
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,097
Likes: 0
From: DETROIT, (formerly Eaton County, Michigan)
Personally I think the SRT-10 is a better truck than the lightning. However you definitely pay for the LITTLE advantage it has.
The interior is far superior.
The engine is bada$$... (c'mon people an aluminum v-10 making 500 from the factory, those who aren't impressed are lying)
Not to crazy about the styling or the size and weight of it, or the clutch.
Plus they are still produced.
One caveat though:
I remember everyone complaiing that the lightning was mass produced and lost the "exclusivity" of a limited production SVT truck. Well 5 years after they quit making it, people immediately complained. But we were calmed down because we knew the Gen 3 was on the horizon. Then Ford Axed that project (thanks bean counters).
Ford is damned if they do (produce too many Lightnings, not rare)
And
Ford is damned if they don't (quit making them and not make a gen 3)
But if I had to choose I'd still choose the lightning. A truck in the driveway and money in the bank is worth more to me than a more exclusive truck in the driveway and less money in the bank.
The interior is far superior.
The engine is bada$$... (c'mon people an aluminum v-10 making 500 from the factory, those who aren't impressed are lying)
Not to crazy about the styling or the size and weight of it, or the clutch.
Plus they are still produced.
One caveat though:
I remember everyone complaiing that the lightning was mass produced and lost the "exclusivity" of a limited production SVT truck. Well 5 years after they quit making it, people immediately complained. But we were calmed down because we knew the Gen 3 was on the horizon. Then Ford Axed that project (thanks bean counters).
Ford is damned if they do (produce too many Lightnings, not rare)
And
Ford is damned if they don't (quit making them and not make a gen 3)
But if I had to choose I'd still choose the lightning. A truck in the driveway and money in the bank is worth more to me than a more exclusive truck in the driveway and less money in the bank.
