Lightning

Cylinder Heads back from EXTRUDE HONE (pictures)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 19, 2003 | 07:08 PM
  #16  
ShaneMcKenna203's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,501
Likes: 0
From: Plainfield, Illinois
Originally posted by superfords
this :
Nice. That should be fun!

My buddy picked up a similar kit. He got it for his mustang. I guess he isnt going to put it on the car, he is saving up for a supercharger... When is your truck going to be all done?
Shane
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2003 | 07:11 PM
  #17  
Nosdog2's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Glen Burnie, Maryland
Those look awesome!
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2003 | 10:24 PM
  #18  
captainoblivious's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 4,565
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally posted by yysenhimer
...Flow numbers don't tell the whole story. Just because heads flow better doesn't mean that it will result in lower ET's and higher MPH. Not to sound negative. And with all of the other mods that you will probably bolt on at the same time, you'll probably never know the true gains from them.
Gains ... no gains ....

Just look at all those threads for the spark splugs
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 10:26 AM
  #19  
superfords's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,300
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA, USA
some before & after shots:


 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 10:32 AM
  #20  
superfords's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,300
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA, USA

 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 10:34 AM
  #21  
superfords's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,300
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA, USA

 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 10:53 AM
  #22  
FuB's Avatar
FuB
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
From: Oak Park, CA
Bling Bling!
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 11:15 AM
  #23  
sirket's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 179
Likes: 2
From: New York, NY
The heads look beautiful!

Isn't there something to be said for the rougher finish on the intake ports though? Wouldn't a rougher finish cause more turbulence and help keep the fuel in suspension as opposed to on the walls of the intake?

-Don
 

Last edited by sirket; Nov 20, 2003 at 11:23 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 11:16 AM
  #24  
Audio18's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Either way, it still looks pretty! If the flow numbers aren't all that different, then maybe you should just stick it on the coffee table as a conversation piece. However, I doubt it will end there, since hopefully it was a worthwhile expense.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 12:27 PM
  #25  
superfords's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,300
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA, USA
Originally posted by sirket
Isn't there something to be said for the rougher finish on the intake ports though? Wouldn't a rougher finish cause more turbulence and help keep the fuel in suspension as opposed to on the walls of the intake?

-Don
most people believe this because back in the old days on carb intakes, the fuel had to actually travel through the runners in the manifold and head. the distance from the fuel injector to the intake valve on our fuel injected heads however is only a matter of a few inches (maybe 5 inches or so). at the speed that the air is flowing through that runner and with the better spray pattern that a fuel injector provides compared to a carb, I don't believe that it will be an issue. but it's all just a matter of theory at this point, as I've never actually hung out inside an intake runner for any period of time while the engine was running

we'll see if it works or not pretty shortly.

later,
chris
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 01:20 PM
  #26  
sirket's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 179
Likes: 2
From: New York, NY
on carb intakes, the fuel had to actually travel through the runners in the manifold and head. the distance from the fuel injector to the intake valve on our fuel injected heads however is only a matter of a few inches (maybe 5 inches or so).
You may not believe me but for some reason the fact that the engine was Fuel Injected _completely_ slipped my mind. I've been doing a little too much work on a BMC A series engine lately, SU carb and all.

-Don
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 01:36 PM
  #27  
grinomyte's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 0
Originally posted by superfords
Don't know enough about engine construction to tell, is that an injector?
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 02:23 PM
  #28  
Dale-01L's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
From: Ventura, CA
Originally posted by grinomyte
Don't know enough about engine construction to tell, is that an injector?
Valve Guide (Upside Down)

Those heads look pretty damn good!

-Dale
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 02:58 PM
  #29  
grinomyte's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 0
oh duh .. . all this time i never put any though as to where the vavle stems would go.

/feeling dumb
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 03:22 PM
  #30  
Rob_02Lightning's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 11,153
Likes: 0
From: Selden NY
Beautiful Job Chris
Can't wait to see you run those 10's




 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:23 PM.