Lightning

cat-backs are no good??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 16, 2003 | 06:01 PM
  #1  
LeoGSVT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, Fl.
cat-backs are no good??

im looking to buy a MAC Catback for my 2000 L, i have some other mods on it already (chip,intake,pulley,shift kit) and ive done some reading and some people are saying that cat back dont do much to the performance level, im looking for something loud, and improves performance, but im on a $400 budget, i found the MAC catback for $268.99 at RPMOUTLET.COM and it says it improves hp by 24, and add 25 lbs of trq.!!!!! here is the link is this b/s?? they say they have dyno tested all of thier products for the most power.....let me know everyone....


MAC catback
 

Last edited by LeoGSVT; Jul 16, 2003 at 06:06 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2003 | 06:04 PM
  #2  
cyntaxx's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,298
Likes: 1
From: here
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2003 | 06:04 PM
  #3  
grinomyte's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 0
no but cat fronts are awesome.
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2003 | 07:32 PM
  #4  
cyntaxx's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,298
Likes: 1
From: here
Re: cat-backs are no good??

Originally posted by LeoGSVT
im looking to buy a MAC Catback for my 2000 L, i have some other mods on it already (chip,intake,pulley,shift kit) and ive done some reading and some people are saying that cat back dont do much to the performance level, im looking for something loud, and improves performance, but im on a $400 budget, i found the MAC catback for $268.99 at RPMOUTLET.COM and it says it improves hp by 24, and add 25 lbs of trq.!!!!! here is the link is this b/s?? they say they have dyno tested all of thier products for the most power.....let me know everyone....


MAC catback
24 hp and 25 lbs. of torque from a MAC catback? I don't think so.

IMO, the MAC isn't the greatest quality and is not full stainless steel.
I prefer the Magnaflow C/B....I've heard all of the C/Bs and the Bassani and Magnaflow sound the best, with the JDM SB a close second/third. MAC sounds mean at WOT but not worth my 270 bucks.
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2003 | 07:46 PM
  #5  
eatoncharged's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
i have the REM catback and it did add a little top end not 24 hp, i overall like the mac for the price.
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2003 | 09:02 PM
  #6  
blown318's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,081
Likes: 0
From: Dyer, IN
Bassani..... if it wasn't so damn expensive.....
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2003 | 09:18 PM
  #7  
Flying Mofo's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,508
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach/CA
We had MAC come out for our Dyno day. We added the CAI to a truck and lost 3 hp...

Then they added the catback to the truck and lost another 11 hp.

Needless to say, the MAC woman was pissed off.
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jul 16, 2003 | 10:43 PM
  #8  
alphadoggy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 0
From: Ventura, CA, USA
I've been reading these boards for 3 1/2 years and have yet to see any documented instance where a cat back added anything other than noise to a gen.2 Lightning. As ****, said, most of them result in losses. The same can be said of shortie headers (anyone want my JBAs?). The only exhaust mod with proven performance gains are the l.t. equal length headers.
 
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2003 | 01:45 PM
  #9  
tlfwatch's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA/ LIGHTNING FAST
2003 LIGHTNING EXHAUST

THATS WHY I THINK MY STOCK EXHAUST IS BEST FOR SIMPLE MODS ITS TWINS AND SOUNDS GOOD ON MY LIGHTNING WHY CHANGE IT AND LOSE POWER
 
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2003 | 02:05 PM
  #10  
Flying Mofo's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,508
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach/CA
Originally posted by alphadoggy
I've been reading these boards for 3 1/2 years and have yet to see any documented instance where a cat back added anything other than noise to a gen.2 Lightning. As ****, said, most of them result in losses. The same can be said of shortie headers (anyone want my JBAs?). The only exhaust mod with proven performance gains are the l.t. equal length headers.

Magnaflow catback does make power George. With the addition of high flow cats, they make even more power. Ill find out how much was made tomorrow afternoon when my truck comes back.

Reason why many catbacks dont offer a power increase is because no R&D went into the system.

Lets use Bassani for example. They are still using the same damn mufflers they came on my cobra, on their lighting kit. Sure, their kit may be appealing to the eye, but it doesnt generated power like the Magnaflow setup does. Its also twice as much $$.
 
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2003 | 02:10 PM
  #11  
grinomyte's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 0
Re: 2003 LIGHTNING EXHAUST

Originally posted by tlfwatch
THATS WHY I THINK MY STOCK EXHAUST IS BEST FOR SIMPLE MODS ITS TWINS AND SOUNDS GOOD ON MY LIGHTNING WHY CHANGE IT AND LOSE POWER


*Bored at work*

Edit: come to think of it, thats so dumb and poorly done i must be really really bored at work.
 

Last edited by grinomyte; Jul 17, 2003 at 02:12 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2003 | 02:32 PM
  #12  
LeoGSVT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, Fl.
has any one been to RPMoutlet.com?? and looked at the MAC catback that is proven 24hp?? are they liars, if so why doesnt some one sue them! they have a hole page telling how every part is dyno tested and proven to improve that much hp!!!
 
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2003 | 03:05 PM
  #13  
alphadoggy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 0
From: Ventura, CA, USA
Originally posted by Flying ****
Magnaflow catback does make power George. With the addition of high flow cats, they make even more power. Ill find out how much was made tomorrow afternoon when my truck comes back.

Reason why many catbacks dont offer a power increase is because no R&D went into the system.

Lets use Bassani for example. They are still using the same damn mufflers they came on my cobra, on their lighting kit. Sure, their kit may be appealing to the eye, but it doesnt generated power like the Magnaflow setup does. Its also twice as much $$.
Interesting, Kev. If your dyno results back it up you will make a lot of people happy, and probably sell a lot of Magnaflows. I don't mind being proved wrong when it is to the benefit of the Lightning community.
 
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2003 | 03:05 PM
  #14  
TrboH22's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
It's not that incredibly hard to make a dyno lie...you can mess with many things to make it say it gained power...Most everyone has already stated MAC does Not make power on L's....
 
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2003 | 03:08 PM
  #15  
Flying Mofo's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,508
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach/CA
Magnaflow is a company based on integrity, not lies. Hell, their customer service speaks for itself. Compare that to the other companies out there.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:13 AM.