5.0 may be going bye-bye...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 22, 2016 | 03:38 PM
  #1  
glc's Avatar
glc
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Reserves
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,542
Likes: 819
From: Joplin MO
5.0 may be going bye-bye...

Sources Say: Ford F-150’s 4.8L V8 To Feature Dual Injection, Replace 5.0L Coyote
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2016 | 09:29 PM
  #2  
ddellwo's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,823
Likes: 15
From: Houston, TX
Well, at least it's still a V8!

I suspect one of these days you are going to see the announcement that F-150's will only come with a V-6 as the "big" engine.....
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2016 | 09:48 PM
  #3  
KingRanchCoy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,480
Likes: 6
From: San Angelo, TX
Originally Posted by ddellwo
Well, at least it's still a V8!

I suspect one of these days you are going to see the announcement that F-150's will only come with a V-6 as the "big" engine.....
No biggie. They got ya covered :LOL:

 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2016 | 10:26 PM
  #4  
Patman's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,337
Likes: 159
From: DFW
The first generation 5.0 was planned with DI in the future, and the second Gen 5.0 was built with a revised head design to accept DI injectors

Doesn't make sense to dump the 5.0 for a slightly smaller engine, unless they're cranking out crazy MPG out of it? Big CAFE is the only thing that motivates power plant changes.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2016 | 09:44 PM
  #5  
Wookie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 3
From: Cabot, AR
I'm taking this one with the entire shaker of salt...

There could be a small bump in compression ratio if they switch over to DI but that has been designed into the heads since day 1. The latest designs use a combination of port and direct injection but that shouldn't be an issue with the current design. I don't see a real benefit to dropping a new or even revised engine unless it has something big that isn't mentioned in the link. What they are talking about doing could easily be done to the current engine for less cost.
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2017 | 01:29 PM
  #6  
KingRanchCoy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,480
Likes: 6
From: San Angelo, TX
Looks like it's staying for a few more years. This is a reticle for the 2018s

 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2017 | 10:22 AM
  #7  
Paul888's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
I wish people would stop whining about lower displacement engines. This is 2017 and not 1997, as long as the performance isn't cut who the hell cares.
They can dump turbos and superchargers for all I care as long as the truck can do the job and tow.
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Feb 21, 2017 | 01:32 AM
  #8  
adrianspeeder's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,008
Likes: 27
From: Dover AFB DE / Harrisburg PA
Nope. No replacement for displacement.

Adrianspeeder
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:38 AM.