Slowmaro's are.....well.....slow.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 27, 2010 | 08:12 AM
  #16  
FATHERFORD's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,102
Likes: 0
From: Waco/Houston
Both are slow in factory form.

What will be the difference is if the new 5.0 will wake up with mods like the SS does.

Those SS's with the right mods can run...
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2010 | 09:02 AM
  #17  
Patman's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,337
Likes: 158
From: DFW
another one from the same series with two runs, second was much closer

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJHqb...eature=related
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2010 | 09:10 AM
  #18  
Patman's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,337
Likes: 158
From: DFW
and MT's with all three cars 1/4 mile races
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aB4vf...eature=related
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2010 | 09:52 AM
  #19  
streetassasin's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Port Neches, TX
Originally Posted by 1clean42
All drag races I've seen between these two cars have the mustang killing the camaro. Shoot, it was barely slower 0-60 when it had the 4.6. Now with 100 more hp than last year's model, it scoots! 0-60 in 4.3 vs. the camaro's 4.7. That's a pretty big margin

to add: where are you seeing the camaro with the higher mph? It says mustang @ 87 mph and camaro at 79 mph.

No way in hell the 2010 ss does 79 in the 1/8. My old 2001 SS with just intake, exhaust and nitto dr's did 82 in the 1/8 and 107 in the 1/4 with a 2.0 60ft. The 2010 should be around 86-87.
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2010 | 01:24 PM
  #20  
racer114's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Roanoke, Texas
In the first clip, it looked like the guy in the Camaro was sleeping. He came off the line way later than the GT. Not knocking the GT, but that didn't look right.
 
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2010 | 10:51 AM
  #21  
Odin's Wrath's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,121
Likes: 0
From: Hammer Lane
Originally Posted by 1clean42

to add: where are you seeing the camaro with the higher mph? It says mustang @ 87 mph and camaro at 79 mph.

You're right. I must have gone dyslexic when I saw that BS.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVVzt2QfS7E


Now you can say you've seen one review in which the Mustang didn't out accelerate the SS.

The cars are pretty dog-gone close now. They even share the fact that their ergonomics suck for someone over 6 feet tall and 200 lbs. After sitting in both, I've decided neither is a good fit. I still might suffer through a little discomfort for a Z28 or a GT500 though. The Challenger is a much better fit for me, but it's still a Dodge.
 
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2010 | 11:56 AM
  #22  
Patman's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,337
Likes: 158
From: DFW
Originally Posted by Odin's Wrath
Now you can say you've seen one review in which the Mustang didn't out accelerate the SS.
Not to knock that video, but the new GT 5.0 has run a 12.7 stock, and they ran it a 1/2 second slower
 
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2010 | 12:08 PM
  #23  
1clean42's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: Eastland/Stephenville, Tx
I gotta say I'd take either car but definitely the Mustang over the Camaro (I just can't betray Ford like that! ). Plus I really like the interior of the Mustang...camaro, not so much.
 
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2010 | 12:09 PM
  #24  
Odin's Wrath's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,121
Likes: 0
From: Hammer Lane
Originally Posted by Patman03SprCrw
Not to knock that video, but the new GT 5.0 has run a 12.7 stock, and they ran it a 1/2 second slower

If you'll notice, in that video they all had the same tires, too. Which is something most tests don't take into account. When the 2011 Mustang hits the streets in August, we'll know what it has to offer. Ford has a history of sending out "hot" press cars, so we really don't know squat yet. I hope it is that fast. I'm just not going to bury my head up Ford's butt, and pretend that first video was a good representation of how things are going to play out between these two cars in August.
 
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2010 | 12:19 PM
  #25  
Patman's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,337
Likes: 158
From: DFW
Originally Posted by Odin's Wrath
Ford has a history of sending out "hot" press cars, so we really don't know squat yet.
They are stolen?
 
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2010 | 12:19 PM
  #26  
b2therad's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,592
Likes: 0
The new mustangs are so unbelievably comfortable its stupid
 
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2010 | 12:44 PM
  #27  
racer114's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Roanoke, Texas
August? They are coming out now. We'll know sooner than that. Having been a test "dummy" for jet skis in the past, all OEMs send out "hot" (not stolen) units to press events. They are tuned perfectly, etc.
 
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2010 | 01:11 PM
  #28  
Odin's Wrath's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,121
Likes: 0
From: Hammer Lane
Originally Posted by racer114
August? They are coming out now. We'll know sooner than that. Having been a test "dummy" for jet skis in the past, all OEMs send out "hot" (not stolen) units to press events. They are tuned perfectly, etc.

"Hot" and perfectly tuned are not the same thing. Sure. Ford's not the only manufacturer to send out press cars with more HP than advertised, only to leave people scratching their heads when the production models hit the street; but, they are notorious for it.

Just a more aggressive tune can make a huge difference over conservatively tuned stock vehicles. Usually, nobody knows why the press cars were better, because nobody takes them apart to investigate.

I've seen August, and I've seen mid to late summer (Which is about August.) as the release date. I've even read that release could be delayed, while trying to clean up some possible recall issues. Not sure what those issues are, but there IS a brand new power plant being introduced.
 
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2010 | 02:29 PM
  #29  
Patman's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,337
Likes: 158
From: DFW
Originally Posted by Odin's Wrath
Not sure what those issues are, but there IS a brand new power plant being introduced.
make that two brand new power plants

5.0 and 3.7
 
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2010 | 02:51 PM
  #30  
racer114's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Roanoke, Texas
3.7s are starging to hit lots. I haven't seen a 5.0 yet.

With the skis, many of the manufacturers would also ahve ignitions on the press models that didn't make it into the production models. Easy part to hide/disguise to the untrained eye. I'm sure the cars are the same.

In any event, they are both fast and should be fun!
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:04 AM.