Enron: Smartest guys in the Room
Uh....
People are having a problem with the federal government keeping their nose out of business?
Cali was bitching to the feds about electric prices? How come the STATE government didn't step up and regulate?
I can't even begin to comment on the nonsense in this thread.
People are having a problem with the federal government keeping their nose out of business?
Cali was bitching to the feds about electric prices? How come the STATE government didn't step up and regulate?
I can't even begin to comment on the nonsense in this thread.
I wonder what they will be making documentaries about ten years form now.
Oh, wait. They probably won't be making documentaries.
When the government controls industry, they dictate what goods and services are available to the masses.
Ten years form now, we can expect more of what we are being deluged with now. Government propaganda.
Thanks to the OP though, for highlighting one of the pinnacle tenents of our country that we are in the process of losing. The freedom to succeede, and the freedom to fail.
Oh, wait. They probably won't be making documentaries.
When the government controls industry, they dictate what goods and services are available to the masses.
Ten years form now, we can expect more of what we are being deluged with now. Government propaganda.
Thanks to the OP though, for highlighting one of the pinnacle tenents of our country that we are in the process of losing. The freedom to succeede, and the freedom to fail.
Last edited by wittom; Apr 7, 2010 at 07:32 AM.
Clinton failed to pay for the military, even after it had been cut by daddy Bush. I can recall not being able to qualify with my firearms in the military several times because there wasn't enough money in the budget for bullets. I can recall planes sitting in hangers during hurricanes when all other planes had left, because there was no money for parts. Often maintenance would cannibalize planes for parts so they could keep at least some in the air. We were accomplishing our mission with approx 80% resources available. When two or three planes went down (and it happened often) that took our available resources to approx 60%. We stopped bombing units in Iraq I when it was estimated they were at 50% strength, because they were no longer combat effective. That is how close we came to not being able to accomplish our mission.
Bush inherited a recession due to the tech bubble popping. Just as that was getting stabilized he had a war started several months into his administration. Either one was hard on the economy, both made things very difficult. Hell the 9/11 attacks took billions out of our economy at one time, not counting all of the fear and consumer paralysis following the attacks.
When Bush took office after Clinton there was a surplus in the budget and the debt was actually going down. Bush gave that money back with some huge tax cuts for the wealthy. The debt was spiraling out of control and the nation was facing the greatest recession since the Great Depression.
1. There was not a surplus
2. National debt was not going down
3. Tax cuts do not decrease the budget
4. This recession was not caused by government debt
Using Enron as an example of what happens in a free market is not a good example. Typically utilities are given a monopoly over an area but must submit to government control. That government control lies with the state government, not federal. If the utility wants to raise prices they must get government approval. A free market relies on competition to regulate the market. Without the free market companies can do what they want. The government is not a good replacement for the free market.
In my opinion the best way to regulate an industry is to limit mergers and acquisitions. Typically a company can only grow so large before they have to start buying competitors to increase size. By regulating what can be purchased and how large a company can grow through purchases a free market can be assured. Look at the financial sector. The large banks were kept from failing because they were "too big to fail". Most of those companies were only able to grow through the mergers and acquisition over the past several years. Had those purchases not happened the companies that were purchased would have either been sold to a smaller company increasing their size (which would increase competition among the big banks) or would have gone out of business. If the companies that were purchased went out of business, that takes care of excess supply in the market, while allowing competitors to increase their business.
In my opinion the best way to regulate an industry is to limit mergers and acquisitions. Typically a company can only grow so large before they have to start buying competitors to increase size. By regulating what can be purchased and how large a company can grow through purchases a free market can be assured. Look at the financial sector. The large banks were kept from failing because they were "too big to fail". Most of those companies were only able to grow through the mergers and acquisition over the past several years. Had those purchases not happened the companies that were purchased would have either been sold to a smaller company increasing their size (which would increase competition among the big banks) or would have gone out of business. If the companies that were purchased went out of business, that takes care of excess supply in the market, while allowing competitors to increase their business.
You cannot discuss this intelligently without understanding that basic tenant.
That is something Enron and the Bush family lobbied for for years. De-regulation. Don't forget it.

Also, Bush helped Ken Lay and his buddies at Enron when he was governor of Texas. Remember, not only were they personal family friends but Bush lobbied strenuously for deregulation of energy for many years and then when it was deregulated he said the feds had no power to stop the price gouging.
Are you actally saying that you think Bush, in less than one year created policies that help his created the Enron mess? Enron was cooking the books long before Bush started running for president.
Bush did not even announce his energy policy of 2001 until May.
LOL!





If our mods are too afraid to speak up and tell you, then I'll tell you.
I've had it with your insulting attitude and name calling.
What are you, six years old? Can't make a point without insulting people?
I could sit here too and call you names all day long, but it wouldn't accomplish anything, and why lower myself to your level.
Attack the arguement not the poster and stop behaving like an infant.
The name calling gets old real quick, give it a rest already.
I've had it with your insulting attitude and name calling.
What are you, six years old? Can't make a point without insulting people?
I could sit here too and call you names all day long, but it wouldn't accomplish anything, and why lower myself to your level.
Attack the arguement not the poster and stop behaving like an infant.
The name calling gets old real quick, give it a rest already.
Its funny how all you liberals are the ones calling my "an infant" and "not old enough to remember Bush Seniors term", yet I'm the one that sides with personel responsibility not government cradle to grave programs. I may be a generation younger than you, but all that means is just that. You don't want to get called out for acting the way you act, STOP.
Last edited by FX41; Apr 7, 2010 at 07:18 PM.
The hyporcracy from some people here is truely unbelievable.
Originally Posted by Habibi
Is that your hobby wittom? You almost sound proud of it.
I'd like to throw you off a cliff, POS.
I've never seen a goat thrown off a cliff, and if I did, the God you believe in wouldn't be enough to help you as I bashed your face in.
That goes for whether you were doing it, or just standing idly by like some coward doing nothing about it - same thing in my book.
Fk I despise people like you.
I'd like to throw you off a cliff, POS.
I've never seen a goat thrown off a cliff, and if I did, the God you believe in wouldn't be enough to help you as I bashed your face in.
That goes for whether you were doing it, or just standing idly by like some coward doing nothing about it - same thing in my book.
Fk I despise people like you.
Mark to market had nothing to do with the primary accounting fraud these folks perpetrated. It had to do with the "special purpose entities" that were used to keep debt off the balance sheet. Google "variable interest entities" and see the firestorm of accounting pronouncements geared toward consolidating "special purpose entities". This fiasco took down one of the largest public accounting firms in the world. The firm was bankrupt long before they were exonerated of criminal charges by the Supreme Court.






Its funny how all you liberals are the ones calling my "an infant" and "not old enough to remember Bush Seniors term", yet I'm the one that sides with personel responsibility not government cradle to grave programs.

My favorite sign by a tea-bagger was "Keep the GOVERNMENT outta my Medicare!"
LOL!
I honestly wonder if he realized Medicare is a government program?:o
Last edited by Real; Apr 7, 2010 at 09:45 PM.
[QUOTE=Real;4169649]
Your more like "un-real"
You probably don't have the desire to reside on my level anyway, its stature is far beyond yours.[/quote






If you are a right-wing conservative it would be more accurate to say "womb to grave", not "cradle".
My favorite sign by a tea-bagger was "Keep the GOVERNMENT outta my Medicare!"
LOL!
I honestly wonder if he realized Medicare is a government program?:o






If you are a right-wing conservative it would be more accurate to say "womb to grave", not "cradle".

My favorite sign by a tea-bagger was "Keep the GOVERNMENT outta my Medicare!"
LOL!
I honestly wonder if he realized Medicare is a government program?:o
Your more like "un-real"



