Enron: Smartest guys in the Room

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 06:51 AM
  #31  
FATHERFORD's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,102
Likes: 0
From: Waco/Houston
Uh....

People are having a problem with the federal government keeping their nose out of business?

Cali was bitching to the feds about electric prices? How come the STATE government didn't step up and regulate?

I can't even begin to comment on the nonsense in this thread.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 07:28 AM
  #32  
wittom's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
From: Western Massachusetts
I wonder what they will be making documentaries about ten years form now.

Oh, wait. They probably won't be making documentaries.

When the government controls industry, they dictate what goods and services are available to the masses.

Ten years form now, we can expect more of what we are being deluged with now. Government propaganda.

Thanks to the OP though, for highlighting one of the pinnacle tenents of our country that we are in the process of losing. The freedom to succeede, and the freedom to fail.
 

Last edited by wittom; Apr 7, 2010 at 07:32 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 10:19 AM
  #33  
1depd's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 691
Likes: 1
From: Gulf Coast
Originally Posted by FX41
Dude, Enron declared Bankruptcy in Dec of 2001. Bush took his oath of office on January 20th of 2001......what four year term are you referring too?
He's referring to daddy Bush.


Clinton failed to pay for the military, even after it had been cut by daddy Bush. I can recall not being able to qualify with my firearms in the military several times because there wasn't enough money in the budget for bullets. I can recall planes sitting in hangers during hurricanes when all other planes had left, because there was no money for parts. Often maintenance would cannibalize planes for parts so they could keep at least some in the air. We were accomplishing our mission with approx 80% resources available. When two or three planes went down (and it happened often) that took our available resources to approx 60%. We stopped bombing units in Iraq I when it was estimated they were at 50% strength, because they were no longer combat effective. That is how close we came to not being able to accomplish our mission.

Bush inherited a recession due to the tech bubble popping. Just as that was getting stabilized he had a war started several months into his administration. Either one was hard on the economy, both made things very difficult. Hell the 9/11 attacks took billions out of our economy at one time, not counting all of the fear and consumer paralysis following the attacks.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 10:22 AM
  #34  
Super FX4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
From: Memphis
Originally Posted by K-Mac Attack
When Bush took office after Clinton there was a surplus in the budget and the debt was actually going down. Bush gave that money back with some huge tax cuts for the wealthy. The debt was spiraling out of control and the nation was facing the greatest recession since the Great Depression.
oh man...

1. There was not a surplus
2. National debt was not going down
3. Tax cuts do not decrease the budget
4. This recession was not caused by government debt
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 10:34 AM
  #35  
1depd's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 691
Likes: 1
From: Gulf Coast
Using Enron as an example of what happens in a free market is not a good example. Typically utilities are given a monopoly over an area but must submit to government control. That government control lies with the state government, not federal. If the utility wants to raise prices they must get government approval. A free market relies on competition to regulate the market. Without the free market companies can do what they want. The government is not a good replacement for the free market.

In my opinion the best way to regulate an industry is to limit mergers and acquisitions. Typically a company can only grow so large before they have to start buying competitors to increase size. By regulating what can be purchased and how large a company can grow through purchases a free market can be assured. Look at the financial sector. The large banks were kept from failing because they were "too big to fail". Most of those companies were only able to grow through the mergers and acquisition over the past several years. Had those purchases not happened the companies that were purchased would have either been sold to a smaller company increasing their size (which would increase competition among the big banks) or would have gone out of business. If the companies that were purchased went out of business, that takes care of excess supply in the market, while allowing competitors to increase their business.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 02:19 PM
  #36  
Real's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: Western Washington
Originally Posted by FATHERFORD
Uh....

Cali was bitching to the feds about electric prices? How come the STATE government didn't step up and regulate?
The feds have control of interstate commerce, not the states.

You cannot discuss this intelligently without understanding that basic tenant.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 02:23 PM
  #37  
Real's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: Western Washington
Originally Posted by Super FX4
They had a monopoly and monopolies are created as a result of government policy. When I mean government policy, I mean regulation.
No. Enron's price gouging was a direct result of de-regulation, not regulation.

That is something Enron and the Bush family lobbied for for years. De-regulation. Don't forget it.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 02:34 PM
  #38  
Real's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: Western Washington
Originally Posted by FX41
Dude, Enron declared Bankruptcy in Dec of 2001. Bush took his oath of office on January 20th of 2001......what four year term are you referring too?
Bush Senior's 4 year term. Are you so young you didn't know about that?

Also, Bush helped Ken Lay and his buddies at Enron when he was governor of Texas. Remember, not only were they personal family friends but Bush lobbied strenuously for deregulation of energy for many years and then when it was deregulated he said the feds had no power to stop the price gouging.

Are you actally saying that you think Bush, in less than one year created policies that help his created the Enron mess? Enron was cooking the books long before Bush started running for president.
Accounting fraud. It's called "Mark to Market" accounting, another thing the Bush family argued corporations should be allowed to use.

Bush did not even announce his energy policy of 2001 until May.
True. And recently released public documents show that Bush's energy policy was written (in a large part) by Enron execs. In many cases, word for word.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 02:41 PM
  #39  
Real's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: Western Washington
Originally Posted by chris1450
History shows that every time taxes go up the economy suffers. Every time they are lowered, the economy booms.
I suppose that is why one of the biggest economic booms in modern times was kicked off after Bush Jr. lowered taxes?

LOL!



 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 07:15 PM
  #40  
FX41's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 2
From: Bronco Country
Originally Posted by Habibi
If our mods are too afraid to speak up and tell you, then I'll tell you.
I've had it with your insulting attitude and name calling.
What are you, six years old? Can't make a point without insulting people?

I could sit here too and call you names all day long, but it wouldn't accomplish anything, and why lower myself to your level.

Attack the arguement not the poster and stop behaving like an infant.
The name calling gets old real quick, give it a rest already.
I'll call a spade a spade every single time, can't hack it, stay out of the thread. You probably don't have the desire to reside on my level anyway, its stature is far beyond yours.

Its funny how all you liberals are the ones calling my "an infant" and "not old enough to remember Bush Seniors term", yet I'm the one that sides with personel responsibility not government cradle to grave programs. I may be a generation younger than you, but all that means is just that. You don't want to get called out for acting the way you act, STOP.
 

Last edited by FX41; Apr 7, 2010 at 07:18 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 08:06 PM
  #41  
wittom's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
From: Western Massachusetts
The hyporcracy from some people here is truely unbelievable.



Originally Posted by Habibi
Is that your hobby wittom? You almost sound proud of it.
I'd like to throw you off a cliff, POS.

I've never seen a goat thrown off a cliff, and if I did, the God you believe in wouldn't be enough to help you as I bashed your face in.
That goes for whether you were doing it, or just standing idly by like some coward doing nothing about it - same thing in my book.

Fk I despise people like you.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 08:26 PM
  #42  
Windsor's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,650
Likes: 2
From: The Bayou State
Originally Posted by Real
Accounting fraud. It's called "Mark to Market" accounting, another thing the Bush family argued corporations should be allowed to use.
Mark to market had nothing to do with the primary accounting fraud these folks perpetrated. It had to do with the "special purpose entities" that were used to keep debt off the balance sheet. Google "variable interest entities" and see the firestorm of accounting pronouncements geared toward consolidating "special purpose entities". This fiasco took down one of the largest public accounting firms in the world. The firm was bankrupt long before they were exonerated of criminal charges by the Supreme Court.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 08:29 PM
  #43  
Real's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: Western Washington
Originally Posted by FX41
You probably don't have the desire to reside on my level anyway, its stature is far beyond yours.


Its funny how all you liberals are the ones calling my "an infant" and "not old enough to remember Bush Seniors term", yet I'm the one that sides with personel responsibility not government cradle to grave programs.
If you are a right-wing conservative it would be more accurate to say "womb to grave", not "cradle".

My favorite sign by a tea-bagger was "Keep the GOVERNMENT outta my Medicare!"

LOL!
I honestly wonder if he realized Medicare is a government program?:o
 

Last edited by Real; Apr 7, 2010 at 09:45 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 08:34 PM
  #44  
FX41's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 2
From: Bronco Country
[QUOTE=Real;4169649]
Originally Posted by FX41
You probably don't have the desire to reside on my level anyway, its stature is far beyond yours.[/quote





If you are a right-wing conservative it would be more accurate to say "womb to grave", not "cradle".

My favorite sign by a tea-bagger was "Keep the GOVERNMENT outta my Medicare!"

LOL!
I honestly wonder if he realized Medicare is a government program?:o

Your more like "un-real"
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 08:35 PM
  #45  
FX41's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 2
From: Bronco Country
Originally Posted by wittom
The hyporcracy from some people here is truely unbelievable.
Owned. Anything elso Habs?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:16 AM.