Think electric is slow?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 28, 2010 | 01:06 PM
  #16  
Real's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: Western Washington
Originally Posted by Carlsson3
The GAO report says a plug-in compact car, if recharged at an outlet drawing its power from coal, provides a carbon dioxide savings of only 4% to 5%. If the feeling of saving the environment from driving an electric car causes people to drive more, that small amount of savings vanishes entirely.
[/B]
Notice it says "IF" the electricity for electric cars is coal derived the environmental benefits are "only" 4-5%. In my book ANY benefit is a good benefit (and if it comes with prodigious amounts of torque all the better). And don't forget, coal is projected to generate an increasingly smaller amount of the worlds electricity as more and more wind, solar and tidal electrical generating farms come on-line. Not to mention nuclear. And as the transition to electric accelerates, so will the transition to cleaner sources of electricity.

There were not enough service stations or refineries to service all the cars Henry Ford built but they sprung up like wildflowers soon enough. That's how capitalism works. Supply rises to fill the demand.

Of course, we have a source for electricity in abundance: nuclear power. IBD suggests that a program to rapidly expand our nuclear-power generation could fill the gap while generating zero carbon emissions. The Obama administration and the Democrats don’t want that, though.
Absolutely false! The Obama administration has announced a $54 Billion program to break ground on the first new nuclear reactors in almost 3 decades. It's part of his clean energy initiative.

See here:

http://content.usatoday.com/communit...gers-outrage/1

That link was from USAToday which I consider a terrible source of news but at least it is percieved as being in the middle of the conservative/liberal divide. Here's a Fox News link for all you conservative loons out there:

http://whitehouse.blogs.foxnews.com/...r-power-plant/

The GAO also points out that electric cars would have the US trading one set of dictators for another in order to power our cars. The batteries for electric vehicles are lithium-ion, and for the experimental production levels in the US at this moment, we have enough lithium resources to keep pace. However, once we start building electric cars in mass numbers, we will quickly run through our proven stores of lithium. We would most likely have to do business with Hugo Chavez lackey Evo Morales of Bolivia, where half of the world’s proven stores of lithium reside. Even if we didn’t buy directly from the leftist leader, Morales has the ability to set the global price — just as Saudi Arabia and OPEC do with oil.
That's a stupid argument. Hugo Chavez is not the evil dictator Bush made him out to be (he was elected) and, even under Bush, we had an expanding trade with Venezuela:

http://www.hemispheretradeservices.c...ws.cgi?n_id=23

The Bush family has large financial stakes in oil reserves NOT in Venezuela. Unfortunately, Bush used his bully pulpit as president to increase the value of his families oil reserves and to strengthen his ties with Saudi oil interests at the expense of his own country.

Lithium is a metal and is 100% recycleable. Oil is like a drug, it is consumed and you have to keep importing it if you want more energy. Lithium never wears out, it can be used again and again. In any case, the transition to electric cars will be gradual and will slow down if there is a shortage of raw materials that cause the price to rise. The pace of battery technology is astounding and new chemistries are invented every year so do not for a moment use a potential shortage of lithium as an excuse to remain addicted to oil.
Plug-in electrics just trade one carbon source for another, one dictator for another, and deliver a lower-standard vehicle. It’s about as lose-lose as it gets, at least without nuclear power to fuel it.
That's just BS from an extreme right wing website that does not want our country to free itself from it's oil dependency and does not believe that increasing use of fossil fuels is threatening the quality of life for humans on a global scale. The oil interests are fighting tooth and nail to keep their global energy monopoly as long as possible. It's all about the mighty dollar interests of the richest people on the planet. Don't be duped by lame arguments why it will never work. Lame arguements is what ferriers that previously shoed the horses used for transportaion at the turn of the 20th century used to try to stop the terrible, belching, stinky automobile from taking over and putting them out of work. The smart ones became auto mechanics.

You can't stop progress.
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2010 | 01:10 PM
  #17  
rdnk217's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Tucson AZ
Well, i guess im about as ignorant as an official government report
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2010 | 01:13 PM
  #18  
Real's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: Western Washington
Originally Posted by mjb1032
Wow..I'm amazed at that White Zombie car.
I have a '68 Mustang 289 Coupe that I'm restoring.
I've thought of yanking the engine and converting it, as I was planning
to use it as a daily driver.
EV Components sells a "package" to do this....it's only $18,792.00

I estimate I'd use $40. a week in gas with the 289.
It would take 9.03 YEARS to recover the cost.
You are looking at it the wrong way.

You would have to dump at least $10,000 into that 289 to make it EQUAL the performance of the ZOMBIE electric car. All of a sudden the payback seems a lot more reasonable if you want the performance. I know lots of people that have dumped more money than that into engine hop-ups and they ended up with a stinky, gas guzzling muscle car that couldn't beat my stock Volvo sedan to 150 mph.

Plus, electric cars are as close to zero maintenance as you can get and they are a kick in the pants to drive.
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2010 | 01:13 PM
  #19  
JBMX928's Avatar
Graphics Contributor
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo NY
Originally Posted by rdnk217
Well, i guess im about as ignorant as an official government report
Arguing with Real is kinda like arguing with this

 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2010 | 01:16 PM
  #20  
Real's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: Western Washington
Originally Posted by rdnk217
Well, i guess im about as ignorant as an official government report
It's not that the Government report is ignorant, it's that it was a comprehensive report about potential impacts and a right wing website cherry-picked from it to create an unrealistic impression.

The blog article you linked to is not an accurate representation of the report. It's very biased.:o

You are only ignorant if you buy the doom and gloom.
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2010 | 01:21 PM
  #21  
Real's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: Western Washington
Originally Posted by JBMX928
Arguing with Real is kinda like arguing with this
I will stubbornly defend the truth and fight for progress, it's true.

Especially when we have people parroting that Obama is anti-nuclear when he recently funded nuclear power plant construction to the tune of $54 BILLION dollars!

Some "facts" need checking out, especially if they are anti-Obama "facts".
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2010 | 02:45 PM
  #22  
Tumba's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 1
From: >wwOwww<
Originally Posted by Real



That's a stupid argument. Hugo Chavez is not the evil dictator Bush made him out to be (he was elected) and, even under Bush, we had an expanding trade with Venezuela:
Have you ever watched his Sunday TV show? That man makes Stalin look like a Boy Scout.
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2010 | 07:53 PM
  #23  
Dnasty777's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 968
Likes: 1
From: Upstate NY
Originally Posted by Real
You are looking at it the wrong way.

You would have to dump at least $10,000 into that 289 to make it EQUAL the performance of the ZOMBIE electric car. All of a sudden the payback seems a lot more reasonable if you want the performance. I know lots of people that have dumped more money than that into engine hop-ups and they ended up with a stinky, gas guzzling muscle car that couldn't beat my stock Volvo sedan to 150 mph.

Plus, electric cars are as close to zero maintenance as you can get and they are a kick in the pants to drive.
Send me $10,000 and I'll blow the doors off of your Volvo. Plus you break a part on a gas engine and you pay a couple hundred dollars. You break a part on an electric supercar and you're paying thousands of dollars...

EDIT for clarity: The reason I say supercar is because those engines are extremely rare these days while a stock 289 is extremely common in comparison.
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2010 | 08:54 PM
  #24  
Real's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: Western Washington
Originally Posted by Dnasty777
Plus you break a part on a gas engine and you pay a couple hundred dollars. You break a part on an electric supercar and you're paying thousands of dollars...
O.K., whatever you say...
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2010 | 09:06 PM
  #25  
ManualF150's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,636
Likes: 264
From: Vernon, NY
It's all fun an games until our natural resources get filled up with lead oxides from depleted batteries.
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2010 | 09:50 PM
  #26  
Real's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: Western Washington
Originally Posted by ManualF150
It's all fun an games until our natural resources get filled up with lead oxides from depleted batteries.
The newest generation of electric cars don't use lead oxides.

Besides, as electric cars gain market share, battery recycling technology will be ready to turn old batteries into new. My county is mostly rural - farming, fishing and forestry - but we already have battery recycling depots for lead-acid, NiMH and cadmium, thanks largely to the popularity of cell phones, laptops and cordless power tools. The metals are reclaimed and sold on the metals markets. They can be purified to the same purity as freshly mined metals for a much lower cost with very little waste.

It's not rocket science.
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2010 | 07:42 AM
  #27  
wittom's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
From: Western Massachusetts
Hey, I think that this electric car is cool.

Just wait for the day when the rallying call is: we must free ourselves from dependence on foreign lithium ion. Just wait.

Electric cars are cool, and global warming hysteria is a man made hoax!
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2010 | 07:54 AM
  #28  
MTM Ford's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 1
From: Butler, Pennsylvania
Wonder what the Volts Per Minute on that thing is.
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2010 | 12:32 PM
  #29  
Real's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: Western Washington
Originally Posted by wittom

Electric cars are cool, and global warming hysteria is a man made hoax!
Two out of three ain't bad...

1 - Electric cars are cool.
2 - Global warming is man made
3 - Global warming is not a hoax, it's as real as it gets.

Ask your grand-children how global warming worked out for them in 50 years.
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2010 | 02:14 PM
  #30  
Thad's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
I would hope you could get more than a quarter mile out of them in real street use. Imagine the torque for towing with a truck bed full of batteries.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:40 PM.