Think electric is slow?
The GAO report says a plug-in compact car, if recharged at an outlet drawing its power from coal, provides a carbon dioxide savings of only 4% to 5%. If the feeling of saving the environment from driving an electric car causes people to drive more, that small amount of savings vanishes entirely.
[/B]
[/B]
There were not enough service stations or refineries to service all the cars Henry Ford built but they sprung up like wildflowers soon enough. That's how capitalism works. Supply rises to fill the demand.
Of course, we have a source for electricity in abundance: nuclear power. IBD suggests that a program to rapidly expand our nuclear-power generation could fill the gap while generating zero carbon emissions. The Obama administration and the Democrats don’t want that, though.
See here:
http://content.usatoday.com/communit...gers-outrage/1
That link was from USAToday which I consider a terrible source of news but at least it is percieved as being in the middle of the conservative/liberal divide. Here's a Fox News link for all you conservative loons out there:
http://whitehouse.blogs.foxnews.com/...r-power-plant/
The GAO also points out that electric cars would have the US trading one set of dictators for another in order to power our cars. The batteries for electric vehicles are lithium-ion, and for the experimental production levels in the US at this moment, we have enough lithium resources to keep pace. However, once we start building electric cars in mass numbers, we will quickly run through our proven stores of lithium. We would most likely have to do business with Hugo Chavez lackey Evo Morales of Bolivia, where half of the world’s proven stores of lithium reside. Even if we didn’t buy directly from the leftist leader, Morales has the ability to set the global price — just as Saudi Arabia and OPEC do with oil.
http://www.hemispheretradeservices.c...ws.cgi?n_id=23
The Bush family has large financial stakes in oil reserves NOT in Venezuela. Unfortunately, Bush used his bully pulpit as president to increase the value of his families oil reserves and to strengthen his ties with Saudi oil interests at the expense of his own country.
Lithium is a metal and is 100% recycleable. Oil is like a drug, it is consumed and you have to keep importing it if you want more energy. Lithium never wears out, it can be used again and again. In any case, the transition to electric cars will be gradual and will slow down if there is a shortage of raw materials that cause the price to rise. The pace of battery technology is astounding and new chemistries are invented every year so do not for a moment use a potential shortage of lithium as an excuse to remain addicted to oil.

Plug-in electrics just trade one carbon source for another, one dictator for another, and deliver a lower-standard vehicle. It’s about as lose-lose as it gets, at least without nuclear power to fuel it.
You can't stop progress.
Wow..I'm amazed at that White Zombie car.
I have a '68 Mustang 289 Coupe that I'm restoring.
I've thought of yanking the engine and converting it, as I was planning
to use it as a daily driver.
EV Components sells a "package" to do this....it's only $18,792.00
I estimate I'd use $40. a week in gas with the 289.
It would take 9.03 YEARS to recover the cost.
I have a '68 Mustang 289 Coupe that I'm restoring.
I've thought of yanking the engine and converting it, as I was planning
to use it as a daily driver.
EV Components sells a "package" to do this....it's only $18,792.00

I estimate I'd use $40. a week in gas with the 289.
It would take 9.03 YEARS to recover the cost.
You would have to dump at least $10,000 into that 289 to make it EQUAL the performance of the ZOMBIE electric car. All of a sudden the payback seems a lot more reasonable if you want the performance. I know lots of people that have dumped more money than that into engine hop-ups and they ended up with a stinky, gas guzzling muscle car that couldn't beat my stock Volvo sedan to 150 mph.
Plus, electric cars are as close to zero maintenance as you can get and they are a kick in the pants to drive.
It's not that the Government report is ignorant, it's that it was a comprehensive report about potential impacts and a right wing website cherry-picked from it to create an unrealistic impression.
The blog article you linked to is not an accurate representation of the report. It's very biased.:o
You are only ignorant if you buy the doom and gloom.
The blog article you linked to is not an accurate representation of the report. It's very biased.:o
You are only ignorant if you buy the doom and gloom.
I will stubbornly defend the truth and fight for progress, it's true.
Especially when we have people parroting that Obama is anti-nuclear when he recently funded nuclear power plant construction to the tune of $54 BILLION dollars!
Some "facts" need checking out, especially if they are anti-Obama "facts".
Especially when we have people parroting that Obama is anti-nuclear when he recently funded nuclear power plant construction to the tune of $54 BILLION dollars!
Some "facts" need checking out, especially if they are anti-Obama "facts".
Originally Posted by Real
That's a stupid argument. Hugo Chavez is not the evil dictator Bush made him out to be (he was elected) and, even under Bush, we had an expanding trade with Venezuela:
You are looking at it the wrong way.
You would have to dump at least $10,000 into that 289 to make it EQUAL the performance of the ZOMBIE electric car. All of a sudden the payback seems a lot more reasonable if you want the performance. I know lots of people that have dumped more money than that into engine hop-ups and they ended up with a stinky, gas guzzling muscle car that couldn't beat my stock Volvo sedan to 150 mph.
Plus, electric cars are as close to zero maintenance as you can get and they are a kick in the pants to drive.
You would have to dump at least $10,000 into that 289 to make it EQUAL the performance of the ZOMBIE electric car. All of a sudden the payback seems a lot more reasonable if you want the performance. I know lots of people that have dumped more money than that into engine hop-ups and they ended up with a stinky, gas guzzling muscle car that couldn't beat my stock Volvo sedan to 150 mph.
Plus, electric cars are as close to zero maintenance as you can get and they are a kick in the pants to drive.
EDIT for clarity: The reason I say supercar is because those engines are extremely rare these days while a stock 289 is extremely common in comparison.
Besides, as electric cars gain market share, battery recycling technology will be ready to turn old batteries into new. My county is mostly rural - farming, fishing and forestry - but we already have battery recycling depots for lead-acid, NiMH and cadmium, thanks largely to the popularity of cell phones, laptops and cordless power tools. The metals are reclaimed and sold on the metals markets. They can be purified to the same purity as freshly mined metals for a much lower cost with very little waste.
It's not rocket science.
Hey, I think that this electric car is cool.
Just wait for the day when the rallying call is: we must free ourselves from dependence on foreign lithium ion. Just wait.
Electric cars are cool, and global warming hysteria is a man made hoax!
Just wait for the day when the rallying call is: we must free ourselves from dependence on foreign lithium ion. Just wait.

Electric cars are cool, and global warming hysteria is a man made hoax!
Two out of three ain't bad...
1 - Electric cars are cool.
2 - Global warming is man made
3 - Global warming is not a hoax, it's as real as it gets.
Ask your grand-children how global warming worked out for them in 50 years.
1 - Electric cars are cool.
2 - Global warming is man made
3 - Global warming is not a hoax, it's as real as it gets.
Ask your grand-children how global warming worked out for them in 50 years.


