Indoctrination Via Media

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 11, 2010 | 01:06 PM
  #61  
Real's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: Western Washington
Originally Posted by Green_98
Their solutions only makes the problems worse...in EVERY SINGLE issue that we're facing today. That is a fact.
No, that's not a FACT, that's your OPINION.

And too many far right conservatives seem to have a hard time distinguishing between the two.
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2010 | 02:14 PM
  #62  
Green_98's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 0
From: Starkville Mississippi
I can easily distinguish between facts and opinion; thats why I used the word fact. Its the liberals who are so far removed from reality that they are the ones who blur facts, opinion, and fiction together. Example 1: Global Warming. Look Real, you are one of many far-left libs who are so far removed from reality that you actually believe some of the silly ideas that are being tossed around in our world today.




Give me examples of how any liberal ideas are doing positive things for our country
 

Last edited by Green_98; Feb 11, 2010 at 02:24 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2010 | 02:31 PM
  #63  
Real's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: Western Washington
Originally Posted by Green_98
I can easily distinguish between facts and opinion; thats why I used the word fact. Its the liberals who are so far removed from reality that they are the ones who blur facts, opinion, and fiction together. Example 1: Global Warming. Look Real, you are one of many far-left libs who are so far removed from reality that you actually believe some of the silly ideas that are being tossed around in our world today.
Blah, blah, blah....
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2010 | 02:33 PM
  #64  
Norm's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,278
Likes: 0
From: Seabrook,NH
Intelligent response.
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2010 | 02:53 PM
  #65  
Green_98's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 0
From: Starkville Mississippi
Blah Blah Blah = yep, you're right and I'm wrong and it hurts.

I'll accept your concession.
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2010 | 03:00 PM
  #66  
Green_98's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 0
From: Starkville Mississippi
Double post.
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2010 | 04:14 PM
  #67  
4.6 Punisher's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,778
Likes: 10
From: Douglasville GA
I think Al Gore is the only one who actually believes in global warming.
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2010 | 04:19 PM
  #68  
Raoul's Avatar
Certified Goat Breeder
25 Year Member
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 6,182
Likes: 19
From: the moral high ground
Originally Posted by 4.6 Punisher
I think Al Gore is the only one who actually believes in global warming.
That's a fact!

I was there when we threw Al under the bus.
It wasn't pretty but, he had become a liability.
No one individual is more important than the group or the groupthink.
I am certain he understood that, right before he got squished.
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2010 | 04:24 PM
  #69  
Real's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: Western Washington
Originally Posted by 4.6 Punisher
I think Al Gore is the only one who actually believes in global warming.
Then you are thoroughly brainwashed by corporate media because global warming is well documented and supported by the evidence and the vast majority of the scientists who study climate.

Look here, more screwed up scientists making predictions about things that you know more about than they do:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/11/sc...html?th&emc=th

Here's a quote from the article:

"A federal government report issued last year, intended to be the authoritative statement of known climate trends in the United States, pointed to the likelihood of more frequent snowstorms in the Northeast and less frequent snow in the South and Southeast as a result of long-term temperature and precipitation patterns."
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2010 | 05:02 PM
  #70  
screwyou's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Originally Posted by Real
Then you are thoroughly brainwashed by corporate media because global warming is well documented and supported by the evidence and the vast majority of the scientists who study climate.

Look here, more screwed up scientists making predictions about things that you know more about than they do:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/11/sc...html?th&emc=th

Here's a quote from the article:

"A federal government report issued last year, intended to be the authoritative statement of known climate trends in the United States, pointed to the likelihood of more frequent snowstorms in the Northeast and less frequent snow in the South and Southeast as a result of long-term temperature and precipitation patterns."

For someone talking about brainwashing than quotes from an article.......

I give you props.....you do provide comic relief.
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2010 | 05:10 PM
  #71  
Norm's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,278
Likes: 0
From: Seabrook,NH
Originally Posted by Real
"A federal government report issued last year, intended to be the authoritative statement of known climate trends in the United States, pointed to the likelihood of more frequent snowstorms in the Northeast and less frequent snow in the South and Southeast as a result of long-term temperature and precipitation patterns."
Well they got that wrong. Up here in the Northeast we are not getting more frequent storms. Baltimore and DC however are getting dumped on.
 

Last edited by Norm; Feb 12, 2010 at 06:44 AM. Reason: smilies added to help Real
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2010 | 05:21 PM
  #72  
Real's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: Western Washington
Originally Posted by Norm
Well they got that wrong. Up here in the Northeast we are not getting more frequent storms. Baltimore and DC however are getting dumped on.
That's the problem when an amatuer scientist like yourself tries to interpret scientific observations.

The article I linked to clearly states that it is futile to try to link any one event to global climate change and that "climate", by definition, refers to weather when looked at in the macro scale, decades and centuries.

In otherwords, one storm is not going to disprove a climate prediction.

I thought that was obvious but maybe I was giving you guys too much credit when it comes to understanding this kind of subject matter. The point is that global warming and a big snowstorm are not mutually exclusive. I know that concept stretches your mental abilities and that is probably why idiots like Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck have so much sway with you.
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2010 | 05:27 PM
  #73  
Frank S's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 1998
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: Blue Ridge Mountains, GA
Then explain the 1922 knickerbocker storm.

Either G.W. is anthropogenic or it is not.

In another thread, Real stated it was not anthropogenic.

Less snow in the south? http://weather.cbs11tv.com/US/TX/119.html

We're freezing our tails off down here in the south with the coldest winter since the early 80's.

AGW fearmongers are members of a cult based on flawed data and figures.
 

Last edited by Frank S; Feb 11, 2010 at 05:30 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2010 | 05:53 PM
  #74  
Green_98's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 0
From: Starkville Mississippi
Real, climate change has been debated for over 100 years. First, there was panic because we were coming out of an ice storm! Then, holy cow, the earth is getting hotter and we're going to burn up. Then, well, maybe we were wrong, we're heading back into a period of global cooling. Now, as a means to funnell more money to libs, we need to bring up global warming again just because we think there's a small chance that people are affecting the earth.

Al Gore's personal income has risen from $3 million to over $90 million since he's pushed the global warming trend. Figure that out.

The earth has been heating and cooling and heating and cooling, and going through climate change since God created it, and its never going to stop. I agree that we should limit pollution and work to become better environmental stewards, but lets not shoot ourselves in the foot over it.



This climate change study is more stupid than the government study that was done asking prisioners why they wanted to escape from prison. Duh. No need to waste time and tax dollars on this one. Lets move on.
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2010 | 05:56 PM
  #75  
Green_98's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 0
From: Starkville Mississippi
Climate change cannot be tackled just from inside the Untied States, which is where Obama wants to 'lead' and being putting restrictions on American businesses. Absolutely stunning. If the major industrialized nations can't agree and get on board with this, what's the point of limiting ourselves? We all breathe the same air across the globe.

Do you know who is the #1 polluter in the state of California? CHINA.
So why penalize manufacturers and other industry in Mississippi for this?


Real, none of your arguments hold any valid content. You are terribly brainwashed by the media, news outlets, and your own 'elite' mindset.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:57 PM.