But this is one Chrysler product I would LOVE to slide into my garage:

 

That's one heck of a lawnmower.

 

ewww.

id take a stock SRT-8 over it

 

The challengers really are becoming a nice looking pony car IMO. For a heavy car it's got the performance to back it up and those sound mean with certain exhausts on them like the SLP header back set-up. I still would take a terminator over one, but the challenger would be a close second I think at this point.

 

I'm so-so with the Challengers in general, but that car looks damn good in "Petty Blue".....

 

Not bad looking, but I don't like the color.

 

I can't get over the massive size of them...

I wouldn't care if it was the best performing car in the world, way to big and fat for me. I'll stick to mustang.

 

Compared to the new GT 350, that one looks like a blue potato....

 

I'm not too large (6' 2" and 215 lbs.), but I'm not very comfortable in either the Camaro or the Mustang. I really like the performance of both, better than the Challenger, but may end up with a Dodge anyway.

 

I got my Mopar....

I've got a perfect 2000 Dodge Dakota with a nice rare 4.7l v8, 3.92 rear LS, and the NV3500 5 speed...



I love sliding this into my garage during the summer...

 

I think the new Challenger is the best looking out of the 3 newer "retro" muscle cars. Not in baby blue though, Petty or not. They're heavy at 4000 lbs., but don't look any heavier than the new Mustang. I'd say the 2005+ Mustang is pretty boring to look at. It looks like an air bloated facsimile of a '69 Mustang with a few elements of the '67-'68 model thrown in. But absolutely none of the real style of line that the original cars had.

The new Camaro is just straight-up ugly from bow to stern.

 

the color and body kit ruin it for me..all it needs is a 3 foot spoiler and that thing would scream rice...

 

ewww a mopar.. gross that thing is hideous..

 

ugly

 

I will keep my stang. Challengers are as heavy as a tank anyways...