Should I trade?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 20, 2009 | 01:46 AM
  #16  
IDNC76's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,039
Likes: 0
From: NJ
trade it , then id get some of that role on bed liner and paint it flat black
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 02:41 AM
  #17  
GreenBuck50's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,869
Likes: 0
Wish I had a need for two trucks... let alone two cars.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 03:01 AM
  #18  
blackedoutV6's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 1
From: Friendswood, Texas
trade for the ranger man

get rid of the caviqueer
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 07:32 AM
  #19  
Zaairman's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,843
Likes: 0
From: St. Charles, MO
Originally Posted by ddellwo
I'd be inclined to keep the car. You already have a truck, what do you need the Ranger for?

This coming from a guy who has an F-150 and a Ranger.......:o
Because I hate cars, yet need something that gets good mileage. 18 MPG in the F-250 is good, but when you're driving 80 miles a day to work and back, it starts to suck.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 07:57 AM
  #20  
Stealth's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
Well if you're thinking mileage... What does that Ranger get, maybe 23MPG? You're not saving that much at all compared to the 30MPG of the Crapalier.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 09:35 AM
  #21  
Zaairman's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,843
Likes: 0
From: St. Charles, MO
Dad had the exact combo Ranger as this one, now its my brothers. He got 28-29 MPG in it. The Cavi™ is getting about that.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 10:04 AM
  #22  
Stealth's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
That mileage average sounds way off.

I drove a 2000 Ranger 4 cyl 5 speed regular cab short bed with 60,xxx miles for a while and barely averaged 25 with it, 85% highway driving.

The thing ran like a top. Good little truck.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 10:04 AM
  #23  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 82
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Keep the Cav, it fits your personality much better.
 
__________________
Jim
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 10:07 AM
  #24  
Zaairman's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,843
Likes: 0
From: St. Charles, MO
Originally Posted by Stealth
That mileage average sounds way off.

I drove a 2000 Ranger 4 cyl 5 speed regular cab short bed with 60,xxx miles for a while and barely averaged 25 with it, 85% highway driving.

The thing ran like a top. Good little truck.
His has been a great truck, it has 200K on it and is still on the original clutch. When he had it, he did all highway driving.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 10:11 AM
  #25  
Stealth's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
I'm not trying to sway you from getting it, just discussing the mileage figures, which I know you have thought of already.

If you're man enough to handle the Grimace and Barney jokes I say go for it.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 10:21 AM
  #26  
jrbhc8's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
Not all rangers get good mileage. I had a 94 Ranger that only got 14 mpg best. It truly sucked now matter how easy I drove it and it was an auto. See if you can borrow it for a couple days, if you drive 80 miles a day it won't take long to go through the tank and check the mpg figures.

jrbhc8
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 10:21 AM
  #27  
Zaairman's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,843
Likes: 0
From: St. Charles, MO
LOL... Thanks Stealth. Mom and dad seem VERY serious about getting a new(er) Jeep Commander very quickly, so I might just hold out for dad's old Ranger and buy it off them... I'm going to look at a 2006 Commander tonight, loaded with the Hemi.
 
Reply
Old May 21, 2009 | 01:51 PM
  #28  
KingRanchCoy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,480
Likes: 6
From: San Angelo, TX
Originally Posted by jrbhc8
Not all rangers get good mileage. I had a 94 Ranger that only got 14 mpg best. It truly sucked now matter how easy I drove it and it was an auto. See if you can borrow it for a couple days, if you drive 80 miles a day it won't take long to go through the tank and check the mpg figures.

jrbhc8

Thats funny my 1994 ext cab 2.3 4 cylinder with the 5 speed got 27mpg every time, best little truck ever 100,000 miles on it in 5 years and never had one problem. think we replaced brakes tires and shocks at 85,000 miles
 
Reply
Old May 22, 2009 | 08:03 AM
  #29  
05FX4SCREW's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Hold out for the white Ranger. Selling the Cadaver shouldn't be that hard (great starter car for some 16 year old) and you know the history of the truck. You may end up buying someone else's problems with the purple one and you have no idea how it was maintained and driven.
 
Reply
Old May 22, 2009 | 08:50 AM
  #30  
Zaairman's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,843
Likes: 0
From: St. Charles, MO
Originally Posted by 05FX4SCREW
Hold out for the white Ranger. Selling the Cadaver shouldn't be that hard (great starter car for some 16 year old) and you know the history of the truck. You may end up buying someone else's problems with the purple one and you have no idea how it was maintained and driven.
Thats what I was thinking. Plus, if I buy the purple one, then I've gotta pay taxes and license on it. With the white one, I'd just have to pay mom and dad for it and keep it in their name.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:07 PM.