Shoot to kill in MO!!!!!!!!!?????????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 11:20 AM
  #1  
efuehrin's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
From: Concordia, MO
Thumbs up Shoot to kill in MO!!!!!!!!!?????????

MO is going to overtake TX as the bad A** state if this law passes!

We already have the Castle Doctrine passed. That allows a property owner to shoot and kill anyone in their house or out buildings with no repercussions from the law.

Also we can purchase any legal weapon with only a standard FBI background check. A 10 min procedure.

Now this! Maybe it should change to don't mess with MO!

That’s why some Missouri lawmakers are trying to revive another artifact of the Old West, arguing that today’s ranchers need more firepower to respond.

Acknowledging that they’re reacting to the recent wave of cattle rustlings, 17 House members introduced the Missouri Right to Protection Act in February, which would allow property owners to shoot to kill anyone threatening them or their property. Current law allows such a response only inside the home or an automobile but not out of doors — where the cattle and the thieves are.
Full article
 

Last edited by efuehrin; Apr 3, 2009 at 02:08 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 11:23 AM
  #2  
SouthernSkrew's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Czechahoe, Tx
Good ...hopefully that will catch on.


By the way........we can still hang a man for stealing a Horse.
 

Last edited by Bluejay; Apr 3, 2009 at 11:26 AM. Reason: Please do not circumvent the language filter
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 11:32 AM
  #3  
efuehrin's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
From: Concordia, MO
Originally Posted by SouthernSkrew
Good ...hopefully that will catch on.


By the way........we can still hang a man for stealing a Horse.
yea well if this passes I can pop him with my 300 win mag.

(not that that really sounds like any fun.)
 
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 11:36 AM
  #4  
last5oh_302's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,645
Likes: 0
Sheesh... I hate to be the guy that has to go around reading electrical meters
 
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 11:46 AM
  #5  
c1t1d1's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
If its some one breaking in and im there or family is there , im not taking any chances, ide shoot to kill as well, he might have the same idea with you , kill you to steal your stuff.
 
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 11:51 AM
  #6  
efuehrin's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
From: Concordia, MO
Here's the bill. Just sent to me by my biddy who works for Congressman Ike Skelton.

FIRST REGULAR SESSION

HOUSE BILL NO. 632

95TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





INTRODUCED BY REPRESENTATIVES GUEST (Sponsor), DAY, DAVIS, JONES (89), FISHER (125), FUNDERBURK, WRIGHT, KEENEY, DIECKHAUS, McGHEE, NIEVES, WILSON (119), BIVINS, DETHROW, WOOD, ALLEN AND COOPER (Co-sponsors).

1648L.01I D. ADAM CRUMBLISS, Chief Clerk


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



AN ACT

To amend chapter 563, RSMo, by adding thereto one new section relating to the Missouri right to protection act.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the state of Missouri, as follows:



Section A. Chapter 563, RSMo, is amended by adding thereto one new section, to be known as section 563.023, to read as follows:

563.023. 1. The provisions of this section shall be called and may be cited as the "Missouri Right to Protection Act". It is an extension of the "Castle Doctrine".

2. Any lawful citizen of Missouri has the right under the United States Constitution to protect themselves, including but not limited to, the following:

(1) By the use of guns and ammunition;

(2) By the use of mace or other repellants; and

(3) By any other means necessary to stop an assailant.

3. Any lawful citizen of Missouri has the right to defend himself or herself, unless he or she is in the act of committing a crime, without interference from federal or state agencies.

4. Law abiding citizens of Missouri shall not have their gun or ammunition rights waived by any governmental agency nor shall their guns or ammunition be tracked, with but not limited to, markings or radio frequency identification (RFID) dust, paint, or by any other direct identifiers.

5. Any lawful citizen of Missouri has the constitutional right to privacy in such citizen's home, including but not limited to such person's home, farm, vehicle, trailer, or any other place of domicile, and to be anonymous as long as such citizen is not in the act of committing a crime. America was founded on the principles of freedom from persecution by the government. It was meant to be that the federal and state governments were not intended to have the power that they have surmised in the last eighty years. Missouri citizens have the right to the protections listed in this section as was set out in the United States Constitution. No governmental entity has the authority to supersede these constitutional guarantees.







Kyle Wilkens

District Liaison

Office of Congressman Ike Skelton

908 Thompson Blvd.

Sedalia, MO 65301
 
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 11:59 AM
  #7  
Super FX4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
From: Memphis
Expect crime to go down in your area if this passes
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Apr 3, 2009 | 12:03 PM
  #8  
Zaairman's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,843
Likes: 0
From: St. Charles, MO
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:28 PM.