Oregon lawmakers propose 1900% tax increase on BEER!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 03:34 PM
  #1  
s2krn's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Lightbulb Oregon lawmakers propose 1900% tax increase on BEER!

Four Portland legislators joined a Springfield senator to introduce Oregon House Bill 2461, which would impose a $49.61 tax on each barrel of beer produced by Oregon brewers.

“We’re a family-owned, local Portland business. We don’t want to see something cost taxpayers more than the revenue it would bring in,” De Kalb said. “If that tax is passed it would mean consumers would pay $315 million more (in 2009) to buy the same amount of beer they bought in 2008. A pint of beer would go from $4.50 to $6.”

De Kalb said Oregon would potentially lose its prominence as a craft-brew destination and that some small breweries could potentially go out of business.

He said Laurelwood could possibly face job cuts as well.

Prior versions of the beer tax bill have exempted small breweries but this one does not, he added.

House Bill 2461 has been introduced by Portland Reps. Ben Cannon and Michael Dembrow, Portland Sens. Jackie Dingfelder and Diane Rosenbaum, and Springfield Sen. William Morrisette.

http://www.kgw.com/news-local/storie...942e1.html?npc
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 07:58 PM
  #2  
neuspeed5's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 508
Likes: 1
From: California
I wish they would propose that tax here in California. I wouldn't mind if they added to the tax on tobacco too. If people want to harm their bodies, make them pay for it. Instead, we will be facing double registration and a 12 cent per gallon tax increase. My registration will be around 900$ for one year.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 08:26 PM
  #3  
johnnyd2723's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,869
Likes: 0
From: N.E. Ohio
Originally Posted by neuspeed5
I wish they would propose that tax here in California. I wouldn't mind if they added to the tax on tobacco too. If people want to harm their bodies, make them pay for it. Instead, we will be facing double registration and a 12 cent per gallon tax increase. My registration will be around 900$ for one year.
Drinking a brew is harmful to your body? Hmm. Isn't breathing the air in CA bad for your body too(well in some areas anyways ) ?



Anyways, this is the first I've heard of this. Seems a little exsesive to me.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 08:39 PM
  #4  
moose3776's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
From: WV
breathing in CA is known by the state of CA to cause cancer and birth defects...
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 08:56 PM
  #5  
Zaairman's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,843
Likes: 0
From: St. Charles, MO
Originally Posted by neuspeed5
I wish they would propose that tax here in California. I wouldn't mind if they added to the tax on tobacco too. If people want to harm their bodies, make them pay for it. Instead, we will be facing double registration and a 12 cent per gallon tax increase. My registration will be around 900$ for one year.
Or you could move to a non-screwball state that knows how to follow a budget a bit better than the Communist Republic of Kalifornia.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 09:19 PM
  #6  
tequilajohnson's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally Posted by moose3776
breathing in CA is known by the state of CA to cause cancer and birth defects...
good stuff
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 09:37 PM
  #7  
neuspeed5's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 508
Likes: 1
From: California
Originally Posted by Zaairman
Or you could move to a non-screwball state that knows how to follow a budget a bit better than the Communist Republic of Kalifornia.
I never said it was going to make me move. Plus, the pickings are pretty slim considering 46 out of the 50 states are facing a budget shortfall. Yes, even your precious state.
Center On Budget and Policy Priorities

My whole point was that we already pay more than most states for our registration. I would be nice to see the extra tax put onto alcohol and tobacco.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 09:17 AM
  #8  
jlstang351's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: GA
That would suck!! That **** want never fly! They sure do want to help the economy huh
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 09:21 AM
  #9  
JBMX928's Avatar
Graphics Contributor
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo NY
First Oregon is proposing a bill to ban all aftermarket items on vehicles, now this? Sure seems like an awesome place to live.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:45 PM.