Another Computer Question From Habibi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 01:09 AM
  #1  
Habibi's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 664
Likes: 1
From: Whitehorse, Yukon
Another Computer Question From Habibi

I bought my computer exactly 4 years ago, Dell XPS.
Way back 'then' dual core and quad core, or whatever else is available now wasn't available. (If it was, I missed that boat)

All I know is I paid a pile of extra cash to get the 3.GHz chip as an option.

Anyhow, here's my question:

So my pc is single core (one chip) running at 3.8 MHz.
With these dual cores and quad cores out today, would you say a 2.2 GHz quad core is faster than a single 3.8 chip?
Know what I mean? Huh do ya?

I run a certain math program that's a real memory hog, performs a zillion calculations a second, hence my need for a fast CPU.

I'm thinking of getting a new one but only if getting a quad core would increase the speed of my math calculations.

Which speed quad core chip would give me a faster speed than my current 3.8?

This is so freaking confusing, they have more chip configurations than you can shake a stick at.

What could I get that is double the speed of what I currently have?

Thanks for reading my ramble and your help is appreciated.

Habibi
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 01:24 AM
  #2  
birddog_61's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: Graham TX
I run an Intel Q9550 quad 2.83Ghz with 8gb or ram running vista 64, it is blazing fast. It maxis out my vista score and I have had no problems running any program I can throw at it, including some 3d map programs that load hundreds of thousands of points of data and then allows you to move them around in real time.
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 01:45 AM
  #3  
mSaLL150's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,862
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
Any multicore proc is going to pwn your p4. You can get decent quadcores for a budget price nowadays. And now that they are on the new 45nm platform, they are extremely power efficient as well.

I have an older c2d 6600 overclocked 40% and its pretty fast in my gaming rig. Going to upgrade pretty soon though.
 

Last edited by mSaLL150; Feb 10, 2009 at 01:48 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 05:17 AM
  #4  
MDK's Avatar
MDK
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Think of it as multitasking. You can do one thing really fast with a single core processor but with a dual core I can do twice as much at close to the same speed but I'm not limited to one thing, same with the quad core. You can even get cheap quad cores but yes as it's been said any dual/quad with destroy a single core especially if you are trying to do a math program or anything that takes a lot of computing you want multi cores.
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 07:24 AM
  #5  
kingfish51's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,550
Likes: 2
From: Mount Airy,MD
You will find that a dual core (core 2 duo) will be faster than you single core pentium, or dual core pentium. A quad core will be faster than a core 2 duo, and the new Core I7 will be faster than the current Core 2 quad.
Back when I switched from a Pentium D (dual core) 3.6ghz to a Core 2 Duo 2.66ghz processor, I did some testing of video rendering with both processors. The Core 2 duo was consistently 30 - 50% faster than the Pentium D, even though the processor "speed" was slower.

I did the same tests when I went from a Core 2 Duo 2.66 to a Core 2 Quad (2.8ghz) with similar results.
 

Last edited by kingfish51; Feb 10, 2009 at 07:27 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 12:35 PM
  #6  
Habibi's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 664
Likes: 1
From: Whitehorse, Yukon
Thanks guys,

If one of you knowledgeable fellas could take a look at
www.dell.ca
They have several models available.
Which one of those models would double my computing power at the cheapest price?
(desktop)

Thanks
habibi
 

Last edited by Habibi; Feb 10, 2009 at 12:43 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 01:13 PM
  #7  
kingfish51's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,550
Likes: 2
From: Mount Airy,MD
This one would more than double the power you have now.

http://configure.dell.com/dellstore/...&OC=DSXPS_R_1E
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Feb 10, 2009 | 02:00 PM
  #8  
Habibi's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 664
Likes: 1
From: Whitehorse, Yukon
Originally Posted by kingfish51
This one would more than double the power you have now.

http://configure.dell.com/dellstore/...&OC=DSXPS_R_1E
Thanks Kinger,

So the i7-920 chip is quad core right?
and this chip tuned to 2.66GHz will double my current signle 3.8 intel P4 chip?
I get confused sometimes because it doesn't always say quad core even if it is.
(No Stealth, the above line is not for your new signature ya ***** )


Ok thanks again, now I just have to figure out the options!

Habibi
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 02:04 PM
  #9  
dzervit's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,424
Likes: 0
From: Motor City
Originally Posted by Habibi
So the i7-920 chip is quad core right?
and this chip tuned to 2.66GHz will double my current signle 3.8 intel P4 chip?
Yes, that is a 4 core chip. It will more than double the performance of that crappy **** P4 chip you have. Prolly offer up 6x or more of the performance.

If you get confused with chip models, check out this handy dandy site to compare...

http://compare.intel.com/pcc/default.aspx?familyID=1
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 02:21 PM
  #10  
Habibi's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 664
Likes: 1
From: Whitehorse, Yukon
Originally Posted by dzervit
Yes, that is a 4 core chip. It will more than double the performance of that crappy **** P4 chip you have. Prolly offer up 6x or more of the performance.

If you get confused with chip models, check out this handy dandy site to compare...

http://compare.intel.com/pcc/default.aspx?familyID=1
Thanks D, you're a good fella.


PS--> If I told you what I paid for my machine 4 years ago, it would make me cry
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 02:53 PM
  #11  
dzervit's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,424
Likes: 0
From: Motor City
Originally Posted by Habibi
PS--> If I told you what I paid for my machine 4 years ago, it would make me cry
Prolly less than what my 486DX-50 machine cost 11 years prior to you getting your machine. That makes me cry. Technology is amazing.
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 03:15 PM
  #12  
inurok's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 902
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
I tell you I have 2 quad core systems. one is 2.66 ghz and the other is 3.00 ghz and they done seem that much quicker than my other P4 3.4 ghz extreme edition system? Well at least not a night and day difference. I am hoping the new i7 cpu offers a bigger noticeable improvement.
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 03:52 PM
  #13  
Habibi's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 664
Likes: 1
From: Whitehorse, Yukon
Originally Posted by dzervit
Prolly less than what my 486DX-50 machine cost 11 years prior to you getting your machine. That makes me cry. Technology is amazing.
This should bring back a nice memory for you D.



My first PC was a hand-me-down from my pops, it was an IBM XT, oh how times have changed.
I never really learned DOS, always had a cheat cheat on my desk with the various commands.

We've come a long way from Carmen Sandiego & Leisure Suit Larry.
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 04:05 PM
  #14  
dzervit's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,424
Likes: 0
From: Motor City
Originally Posted by Habibi
This should bring back a nice memory for you D.

My first PC was a hand-me-down from my pops, it was an IBM XT, oh how times have changed.
I never really learned DOS, always had a cheat cheat on my desk with the various commands.

We've come a long way from Carmen Sandiego & Leisure Suit Larry.
I had that same PC with its awesome 8088 processor running at a blistering 4.77MHz!!! LS Larry was the greatest game evar.

I still use a bulk of those DOS commands today. Somethings never change.
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 04:12 PM
  #15  
DearbornDerek's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Redford, Michigan
I put the new i7 in my new rig a couple of months ago...Simply amazing!! I can run multiple programs and not even make a dent in the percent of CPU used (average around 3-5%). Running Crysis at highest settings, I got it up to 12% (while running three other programs in the background).


Forgot to mention...I got the low end i7 for $200.
 

Last edited by DearbornDerek; Feb 10, 2009 at 04:14 PM. Reason: added stuff
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:14 PM.