$700 Billion Government Bailout
Please don't ever buy a United Airlines ticket anywhere.
(UAL and Enron alike. I have personal greviences with these two!)
Not any more . . .

In essence, we (the tax payers) are not just bailing out the financial firms, there is some benefit to the irresponsible jerks who took those loans (some, not all). The problem is that greed, not just on the part of the investment bank jerks, but on the part of lenders and borrowers created a force a lot like gravity. And, never forget, sooner or later, gravity always works.
I say start prosecuting the CEO of the banks and the investment banks. Take back the options and bonus money and lock them up (executing them would be nice). Given the way the current administration works, you could easily make a case that their actions have caused irreparable harm to the national security. Also, bust those who overextended themselves by knowingly buying houses they couldn't afford and then shirked responsibility, then execute them too. This has multiple benifits. A: So many executions lowers the population and helps improve the percentage of unemployment. B: It allows for a controlled revolution of sorts. You can even televise it. That would lead to C: High ratings in TV, bigger advertising dollars spent, which in turns increases spending, which helps bring the economy back. It's a win-win for us tax payers.
Pretty much.
Well, it's not the first place I've owned, but it is the first SFH of this scale I've owned. It's both a blessing and a curse. At the moment, it's kind of a curse.
How be you?
Last edited by kobiashi; Sep 22, 2008 at 02:37 PM.
From what I have read the gov't is going to purchase shares of the Banks at a low discounted cost to give the banks more liquidity (cash). Then the gov't wants to sell the shares when the stock rises for a "profit". Who knows how long it will take to reach that point of "profit".
As for who's paying it - you and me for a very very long time. will we see any of that "profit"? probably not in our lifetime.
dont you remember the $600 "gift from the gov't to stirr the economy up. what ever happened to that?
http://money.cnn.com/2008/09/22/news...ion=2008092213
As for who's paying it - you and me for a very very long time. will we see any of that "profit"? probably not in our lifetime.
dont you remember the $600 "gift from the gov't to stirr the economy up. what ever happened to that?
http://money.cnn.com/2008/09/22/news...ion=2008092213
Best answer in this whole thread.
I mean even though I'm Canadian our Gov't does the same crap. If I lost my job do you thnk the gov't would give me money to bail me out...HEEELLLLLL NO!!!.. All these CEOs should be told to sell everything they own and use that to pay the debt and the gov't MAY pay the difference. At least these rich A-holes will have to face some kind of punishment. Like Eddie Murphy said in Trading Places, "The best way to hurt rich people is to make em poor people".
I mean even though I'm Canadian our Gov't does the same crap. If I lost my job do you thnk the gov't would give me money to bail me out...HEEELLLLLL NO!!!.. All these CEOs should be told to sell everything they own and use that to pay the debt and the gov't MAY pay the difference. At least these rich A-holes will have to face some kind of punishment. Like Eddie Murphy said in Trading Places, "The best way to hurt rich people is to make em poor people".
is our government stupid? were already so much in debt i think don't 700 billion dollars is gonna help us get out of debt. i say screw who cant afford what they bought they should of thought about that when they bought the property and they should not expect people to help them out for their stupid mistakes.
Everyone wants to blame the borrower who lost their house.
Why no blame to the lender who profited from selling the loan in the first place?
If you loaned me money I never paid back, and you already knew I had problems with my credit who really made the stupid mistake?
No bail out, no blank check without oversight, regulation and taxpayer benefits. If this has to be done, conditions have to be applied. They shouldn't get anything - they already get paid for failure. - Og

In the Military there is a saying that "You can delegate authority but you can never delegate responsibility." He should quit or be fired since he never saw any of this mess coming.
Let the free market work. If we leave the same people at the wheel we risk the same mistakes again down the road.
I think the bailout is necessary to save the economy. A bail out of Main Street not Wall Street. Why save the big guy who Sharted all of the little guy's money away?
What is not necessary are CEOs, VPs, and board members getting million dollar packages for as Old Dogg said who "made billions with their stupid mistakes".
Their company failed why are we rewarding them with more money???
That is the real thing that grinds my gears. We could quite possibly give more millions to those who made millions.
The GOP needs to be able to look at a situation and be able to smack in the face and say "Knock that Sh*t off" However, who is going to tell someone to stop making money. That is exactly what happened in Congress. A few "smart" (I use that word carefully when talking about Gov't officials, especially Congress) men and women in Congress saw the looming future of our Stock/housing market and tried to pass legislation to, not even stop the profits, but to at least take a step back and see where the train was heading. "The administration opposed the bill, and it was defeated on a party-line vote here in the Senate," Senator Christopher Dodd.
Source
What is not necessary are CEOs, VPs, and board members getting million dollar packages for as Old Dogg said who "made billions with their stupid mistakes".
Their company failed why are we rewarding them with more money???
That is the real thing that grinds my gears. We could quite possibly give more millions to those who made millions.
The GOP needs to be able to look at a situation and be able to smack in the face and say "Knock that Sh*t off" However, who is going to tell someone to stop making money. That is exactly what happened in Congress. A few "smart" (I use that word carefully when talking about Gov't officials, especially Congress) men and women in Congress saw the looming future of our Stock/housing market and tried to pass legislation to, not even stop the profits, but to at least take a step back and see where the train was heading. "The administration opposed the bill, and it was defeated on a party-line vote here in the Senate," Senator Christopher Dodd.
Source
I would rather we let these companies fail. liquidate their assets to pay off their debt and let the economy correct. Will it suck for a year or so, yeah, but then get better, instead of us bailing them out with the "hope" that they will get paid, they wont, and then the economy sinks bad and is that way for a decade.....its called a free market and we shoud use it!




