Flat Earth Society
You like fat ugly chicks. I can still remember the nasty she-male you tried to copulate with on that camping trip last year. But hey, I really should not mock you, cuz big girls need love too...
Originally Posted by last5whatever
He uses a lot of quotes out of those Harry Potter books, doesn't he?
When ya make an attempt to belittle someone...try and make sure that you really embellish, or that you use something semi related to the truth. Saying the above only makes me pity each of you
For example... Crazed REALLY did try to get into the pants of something that vaguely resembled the opposite sex. See how thats funny, and will irritate him at the same time. Be creative, dont reach...
Last edited by Shinesintx; Aug 16, 2008 at 11:36 PM.
External evidence from both archaeology and non-Christian writers confirms that the Bible--both Old and New Testaments--is a trustworthy historical document. Archaeologist Joseph Free has said that "Archaeology has confirmed countless passages which had been rejected by critics as unhistorical or contrary to known facts."
fantasy
noun
1. imagination, esp. when extravagant and unrestrained.
2. the forming of mental images, esp. wondrous or strange fancies; imaginative conceptualizing.
3. a mental image, esp. when unreal or fantastic; vision: a nightmare fantasy.
4. Psychology. an imagined or conjured up sequence fulfilling a psychological need; daydream.
5. a hallucination.
6. a supposition based on no solid foundation; visionary idea; illusion: dreams of Utopias and similar fantasies.
7. caprice; whim.
8. an ingenious or fanciful thought, design, or invention.
9. Also, fantasia. Literature. an imaginative or fanciful work, esp. one dealing with supernatural or unnatural events or characters: The stories of Poe are fantasies of horror.
10. Music. fantasia (def. 1).
–verb (used with object), verb (used without object)
11. to form mental images; imagine; fantasize.
12. Rare. to write or play fantasias.
Sounds a lot like the Christian religion.
noun
1. imagination, esp. when extravagant and unrestrained.
2. the forming of mental images, esp. wondrous or strange fancies; imaginative conceptualizing.
3. a mental image, esp. when unreal or fantastic; vision: a nightmare fantasy.
4. Psychology. an imagined or conjured up sequence fulfilling a psychological need; daydream.
5. a hallucination.
6. a supposition based on no solid foundation; visionary idea; illusion: dreams of Utopias and similar fantasies.
7. caprice; whim.
8. an ingenious or fanciful thought, design, or invention.
9. Also, fantasia. Literature. an imaginative or fanciful work, esp. one dealing with supernatural or unnatural events or characters: The stories of Poe are fantasies of horror.
10. Music. fantasia (def. 1).
–verb (used with object), verb (used without object)
11. to form mental images; imagine; fantasize.
12. Rare. to write or play fantasias.
Sounds a lot like the Christian religion.
fantasy
noun
1. imagination, esp. when extravagant and unrestrained.
2. the forming of mental images, esp. wondrous or strange fancies; imaginative conceptualizing.
3. a mental image, esp. when unreal or fantastic; vision: a nightmare fantasy.
4. Psychology. an imagined or conjured up sequence fulfilling a psychological need; daydream.
5. a hallucination.
6. a supposition based on no solid foundation; visionary idea; illusion: dreams of Utopias and similar fantasies.
7. caprice; whim.
8. an ingenious or fanciful thought, design, or invention.
9. Also, fantasia. Literature. an imaginative or fanciful work, esp. one dealing with supernatural or unnatural events or characters: The stories of Poe are fantasies of horror.
10. Music. fantasia (def. 1).
–verb (used with object), verb (used without object)
11. to form mental images; imagine; fantasize.
12. Rare. to write or play fantasias.
Sounds a lot like the Christian religion.
noun
1. imagination, esp. when extravagant and unrestrained.
2. the forming of mental images, esp. wondrous or strange fancies; imaginative conceptualizing.
3. a mental image, esp. when unreal or fantastic; vision: a nightmare fantasy.
4. Psychology. an imagined or conjured up sequence fulfilling a psychological need; daydream.
5. a hallucination.
6. a supposition based on no solid foundation; visionary idea; illusion: dreams of Utopias and similar fantasies.
7. caprice; whim.
8. an ingenious or fanciful thought, design, or invention.
9. Also, fantasia. Literature. an imaginative or fanciful work, esp. one dealing with supernatural or unnatural events or characters: The stories of Poe are fantasies of horror.
10. Music. fantasia (def. 1).
–verb (used with object), verb (used without object)
11. to form mental images; imagine; fantasize.
12. Rare. to write or play fantasias.
Sounds a lot like the Christian religion.

I was only commenting as to the historical significance of the Bible.
It could be said that the Bible is a book of history -- and it is. The bible describes places, people, and events in various degrees of detail. It is essentially an historical account of the people of God throughout thousands of years. If you open to almost any page in the Bible you will find a name of a place and/or a person. Much of this can be verified from archaeology. Though archaeology cannot prove that the Bible is the inspired word of God, it has the ability to prove whether or not if some events and locations described therein are true or false. So far, however, there isn't a single archaeological discovery that disproves the Bible in any way.
Nuk=Fail
I was only commenting as to the historical significance of the Bible.
He is good at failing... he supports obama after all.
Ignorance can be defined as having information and facts that are readily available and documented, but choosing to IGNORE them. This seams to be the world that you currently live in. You may choose to deny God's son, I can understand why you would do so. But to flat out deny the historical accounts when faced with archeological facts is, well, just plain ignorant.

I was only commenting as to the historical significance of the Bible.
He is good at failing... he supports obama after all.
Ignorance can be defined as having information and facts that are readily available and documented, but choosing to IGNORE them. This seams to be the world that you currently live in. You may choose to deny God's son, I can understand why you would do so. But to flat out deny the historical accounts when faced with archeological facts is, well, just plain ignorant.
Yup.. that about splains it......
Although I may have failed, it's understandable where one could easily get confused; isn't it?
but see that is the difference between you and I is I believe in a god that is self confident enough that he does not feel the need for the adoration of us puny mortals and as long as I don't run around raping and pillaging, murdering or voting for obama mama I will still go to heaven
Shines and some of you other guys are pretty stupid.
You guys actually had to look up some definitions and prove that he is an idiot and fails at everything, when you could have just looked at his signature of the miami dolphins logo to realize he is a total moron
.
You guys actually had to look up some definitions and prove that he is an idiot and fails at everything, when you could have just looked at his signature of the miami dolphins logo to realize he is a total moron
.



I'm not anti Obama, but man, that was frikkin funny!
FAIL... I never looked up a definition... I explained in my own words what ignorance meant. How can you can that bad?
but see that is the difference between you and I is I believe in a god that is self confident enough that he does not feel the need for the adoration of us puny mortals and as long as I don't run around raping and pillaging, murdering or voting for obama mama I will still go to heaven 
but see that is the difference between you and I is I believe in a god that is self confident enough that he does not feel the need for the adoration of us puny mortals and as long as I don't run around raping and pillaging, murdering or voting for obama mama I will still go to heaven 
But I do not consider you to be unintelligent, far from it.
You are correct in your assessment, but wrong in your premise. To my knowledge, I have never really preached to anyone how to live, or said not to do this and that... I have adamantly disagreed with with legalizing drugs, same sex marriage, abortion and other issues. All that I have basically done is try to point individuals to the word of Christ. Have I consistently pointed out that the way to salvation is through Christ? Yes. Have I said that I believe a certain ideology based on my own thoughts and/or experiences without a point of reference? NO. The majority of my thoughts/beliefs posted have been backed up by Scripture. What I fear for you, is that you hold truths that you have created. To my knowledge, you have never cited any references to back your beliefs. What is the basis for you believing:
Is this belief system based on you sitting around and coming to a conclusion, or did someone tell you this, and you blindly accepted it? I am just curious as to your thought process. You may post some of the worst grammar in this forum...
But I do not consider you to be unintelligent, far from it.
Is this belief system based on you sitting around and coming to a conclusion, or did someone tell you this, and you blindly accepted it? I am just curious as to your thought process. You may post some of the worst grammar in this forum...
But I do not consider you to be unintelligent, far from it.my own conclusion, I try to be a decent human being, I don't beat my wife, I don't rob, cheat, or steal, I don't kill furry little woodland creatures unless I plan on eating them, and try to generally do the right thing.
If you really look at it most all religion is the same at its core with the same message don't be a dik. this may be a over simplification but it is what it boils down to.
and it is my personal belief that if god had any interest in the little ant colony running around on the planet that certain things just would not be allowed, and that is where I get my "mostly hands off" view of the Omnipotent higher up.
Creationism vs. Evolution
why do the two have to be mutually exclusive, picture this a organism in a critical stage of the evolutionary process, that can go either way, one path leads to a happy little fishy for all time, the other leads to the human race, getting a nudge in the right direction could have come from a outside entity, be it the god from the bible, or a horny little alien that contributed the 1.3% genetic material that differentiates us from chimpanzees.
in short, for me anyway the most reasonable conclusion is a merger of both science and faith, I do not see them as clashing but as a symbiotic relationship where they complement each other, and evolve together.
the Bible IMO was mans first attempt to put his world into understandable terms, to bring order to chaos, and as our understanding of the natural world evolved thru science so should our faith.



