Gas Prices Cause Ford to Cut Production

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 22, 2008 | 09:57 AM
  #1  
pmason718's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,460
Likes: 0
From: NYC, Ct & NC
Gas Prices Cause Ford to Cut Production

Just like Chevy did.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080522/...i_ge/ford_cuts
 
Reply
Old May 22, 2008 | 11:36 AM
  #2  
scott1981's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,103
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Something is going to have to give soon. The economy is sinking fast, even here in houston we are getting hit pretty bad and we have alot of oil money here
 
Reply
Old May 22, 2008 | 12:29 PM
  #3  
OgRedd's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 1
From: TN
There have been a lot of guys here riding their motorcycles to work. My F150 is the only mode of trans I have. Looking at buying a 4 cyl. beater to get by. I agree - something's gotta give. I heard that gasoline will probably peak at $10.00 a gallon in two years. There goes that Corsa exhaust I wanted. - Og
 
Reply
Old May 22, 2008 | 12:40 PM
  #4  
grizzstang's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, Alberta Canada
You can thank OPEC. They have most of the worlds supply and they keep cutting production to drive prices up. There oil is pennies a barrel to produce you do the math.
 
Reply
Old May 22, 2008 | 01:05 PM
  #5  
Krohbar's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 1
From: HUSKER COUNTRY, USA
Originally Posted by grizzstang
You can thank OPEC. They have most of the worlds supply and they keep cutting production to drive prices up. There oil is pennies a barrel to produce you do the math.
You can also thank our lovely House and Senate members who cave to law-suit happy tree huggers that keep us dependent on foreign oil and 30 year old refineries, no new nuke power plants, and certain soon to be dead senators who don't want non-oil dependent sources of energy (i.e. wind farms).
 
Reply
Old May 22, 2008 | 01:11 PM
  #6  
()smoke()'s Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by Krohbar
You can also thank our lovely House and Senate members who cave to law-suit happy tree huggers that keep us dependent on foreign oil and 30 year old refineries, no new nuke power plants, and certain soon to be dead senators who don't want non-oil dependent sources of energy (i.e. wind farms).
with the possible exception of drilling in the anwr just yet, a big +1
 
Reply
Old May 22, 2008 | 01:14 PM
  #7  
Brad Pitt's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by grizzstang
You can thank OPEC. They have most of the worlds supply and they keep cutting production to drive prices up.
Time to leave the 70s behind. OPEC isn't the primary culprit this time.

The reason oil prices are at 135 a barrel and climbing at a rate faster than they have ever done is because of commodity brokers and the market makers in agri-futures.

Here, this might help you to understand. It's from and article in the Financial Times by Suneet Chopra and it describes eloquently what the deal is with oil these days:

The whole idea thrives on scarcity

When we speak of ‘future trading’ in commodities, we are referring to a situation in which traders and hoarders buy out the producers cheaply and then raise prices by creating false scarcity, with the consumer eventually having to foot the bill.

The most appropriate, and therefore the worst, example of this has been the astronomical rise in the price of crude oil. A US senate panel has not only conducted an inquiry but has come to the definitive conclusion that the uncontrollable surge in crude prices — what with the Brent currently trading at over $120 per barrel spot price — is without doubt the outcome of Hedge funds having taken bets worth $12 trillion and more on oil futures. That this could raise the price of crude to no less than $1,000 a barrel in the next four to five years seems no longer an implausible or impossible proposition.

An April 24 report on the Dow Jones online Financial News notes that oil speculators, backed and/or tempted by the enticing play of international finance capital, have offered to buy more than the producers can produce, artificially raising prices among themselves. This spike, clearly, has nothing whatsoever to do with the actual scarcity or not of a commodity. Commodities are being traded on in this profligate manner because stocks and shares have failed to deliver. But because of this speculation, the consumer pays more.
(Granted, OPEC could be collusion with commodity brokers and market makers, but that's a whole other can of worms).
 
Reply
Old May 22, 2008 | 01:18 PM
  #8  
()smoke()'s Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by Brad Pitt
Time to leave the 70s behind. OPEC isn't the primary culprit this time.

The reason oil prices are at 135 a barrel and climbing at a rate faster than they have ever done is because of commodity brokers and the market makers in agri-futures.

Here, this might help you to understand. It's from and article in the Financial Times by Suneet Chopra and it describes eloquently what the deal is with oil these days:



(Granted, OPEC could be collusion with commodity brokers and market makers, but that's a whole other can of worms).
nice post
 
Reply
Old May 22, 2008 | 01:19 PM
  #9  
Krohbar's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 1
From: HUSKER COUNTRY, USA
You know, if we just nuke China and India, it would:
A) Cut demand for oil considerably
B) Bring the tele-comm jobs back home
C) Bring manufacturing jobs back home

That would strengthen the U.S. economy pretty quickly I'd say.

 
Reply
Old May 22, 2008 | 01:20 PM
  #10  
()smoke()'s Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by Krohbar
You know, if we just nuke China and India, it would:
A) Cut demand for oil considerably
B) Bring the tele-comm jobs back home
C) Bring manufacturing jobs back home

That would strengthen the U.S. economy pretty quickly I'd say.




now you're back down to 0...big -1
 
Reply
Old May 22, 2008 | 01:23 PM
  #11  
last5oh_302's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,645
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Krohbar
You know, if we just nuke China and India, it would:
A) Cut demand for oil considerably
B) Bring the tele-comm jobs back home
C) Bring manufacturing jobs back home

That would strengthen the U.S. economy pretty quickly I'd say.

GO PENS GO!!
 
Reply
Old May 22, 2008 | 01:32 PM
  #12  
Brad Pitt's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Krohbar
You know, if we just nuke China and India, it would:
A) Cut demand for oil considerably
B) Bring the tele-comm jobs back home
C) Bring manufacturing jobs back home

That would strengthen the U.S. economy pretty quickly I'd say.

Interestingly enough, the fact that the dollar is so weak would allow us to manufacture and export to the rest of the world. (You don't want to nuke those countries, you want to sell to them.)

Also interestingly enough, now that the dollar is weak and the opportunity to start up manufacturing jobs here at home is a reality, do you see corporations taking advantage of that????

No you don't.

Why do you think that is?

(By the way folks, it's a rhetorical question).
 
Reply
Old May 22, 2008 | 02:13 PM
  #13  
Grim's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, O K L A H O M A!
Originally Posted by Brad Pitt
Also interestingly enough, now that the dollar is weak and the opportunity to start up manufacturing jobs here at home is a reality, do you see corporations taking advantage of that????

No you don't.

Why do you think that is?
Total exports have been going up every year since 2003:
http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/...l/gandsexp.pdf
Not all of that is manufacturing, but some of it is.

Grim
 
Reply
Old May 22, 2008 | 02:31 PM
  #14  
PawPaw's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,535
Likes: 28
From: Lockport, La.
Paying about 400 to 500 hundred buck's a month on my daily 100 mile a day commute. Most of my driving is on old highway 90 in South Louisiana, so driving anything smaller then a Kenworth is scary! Gas is around 3.75 for 87 around here now, no price break's for all the refineries we have around here either.
 
Reply
Old May 22, 2008 | 05:14 PM
  #15  
Krohbar's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 1
From: HUSKER COUNTRY, USA
Originally Posted by last5oh_302
GO PENS GO!!
Jerk Nutz...

LET'S GO RED WINGS!!!

Hey... doesn't Canada play hockey anymore?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:51 PM.