Let's start over......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 04:58 PM
  #63376  
TruckGuy24's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,730
Likes: 42
From: Concord, NC
The V-10 would be sweet Jbrew! And yeah that 54 musta had a huge appetite
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 05:04 PM
  #63377  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 82
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Originally Posted by MTM Ford
Just drive the 54 Jim. You'll save money.
I would burn the money up pretty quickly. Driving about 30,000 miles a year and that thing gets about 6 mpg on premium. Plus, it would need an additive to substitute for lead or the valves would burn up.
 
__________________
Jim
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 05:04 PM
  #63378  
MTM Ford's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 1
From: Butler, Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by TruckGuy24
The V-10 would be sweet Jbrew! And yeah that 54 musta had a huge appetite
I'm sure Jim still had a big appetite back then too......
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 05:05 PM
  #63379  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 82
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Originally Posted by MTM Ford
I'm sure Jim still had a big appetite back then too......
I assume you are referring to Jim Brew.
 
__________________
Jim
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 05:09 PM
  #63380  
TruckGuy24's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,730
Likes: 42
From: Concord, NC
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 05:16 PM
  #63381  
MTM Ford's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 1
From: Butler, Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by Bluejay
I assume you are referring to Jim Brew.
You know what they say about assumptions.
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 05:42 PM
  #63382  
TruckGuy24's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,730
Likes: 42
From: Concord, NC
Originally Posted by MTM Ford
You know what they say about assumptions.
Jim was probably asleep when they said it.
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 06:08 PM
  #63383  
ian51279's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,017
Likes: 2
From: Decatur,AL
Jim, just stick with the 5.0. The EB is a great engine I'm sure, it just hasn't been proven enough yet for my to buy one.

Unless you wanna opt up for the 6.2.
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 06:31 PM
  #63384  
Stealth's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
Originally Posted by Bluejay
I understand what you are saying but does that little engine not work harder(more rpms, etc) to produce that power?

This is not really relevant, but back in the late 80s, I had a friend with an 87 Grand National. I had a 1954 Ford F100 with a 351 Clev 4V, 4.88 gears and nitrous. We would race almost every weekend for 1/4 mile. From the standstill, that Buick would take me off the line so far that you would think there was no way I could ever catch him in a 1/4, but about 2/3 down the strip, I would blow his stuff in the weeds and pull away. He never beat me. That thing had tremendous low end torque but ran out of engine about 2/3 down the track. I'm wondering if the EcoBoost is similar or if it is completely different.
The GN wasn't tuned right. I have a good friend who has an 87 GN and that thing is insanely fast through the entire range.
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 06:41 PM
  #63385  
TruckGuy24's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,730
Likes: 42
From: Concord, NC
I have a friend with one too... and his dad had to detune it a bit for him so he wouldn't get into trouble He's got a few mods on that bad boy. It used to be his dad's back in the day and his dad and he are both huge into modded cars. I haven't had a ride in it yet, but for a V6, it sounds mean
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 07:17 PM
  #63386  
Patman's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,337
Likes: 158
From: DFW
gonna be picking up a new 29er this week, very excited....
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 07:20 PM
  #63387  
TruckGuy24's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,730
Likes: 42
From: Concord, NC
a what?
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 07:22 PM
  #63388  
Patman's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,337
Likes: 158
From: DFW
Originally Posted by Bluejay
Both I'm looking at have the 3.55 LS. The 5.0 has the bucket seats withe the full console. The EcoBoost is the same truck except has the fold down console that has the headreast and shouldr harness built in. I prefer the full console.
I hate the shoulder seatbelts built into the seats, they are uncomfortable, and way unsafe for anybody 200lb+
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 07:43 PM
  #63389  
MTM Ford's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 1
From: Butler, Pennsylvania
Think I figured the boat out. Got new plugs, gapped them and put them in. Filled up a 45 gallon garbage can with water and ran it for about 15 minutes. Idles a lot better than before I know that.
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 08:01 PM
  #63390  
Patman's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,337
Likes: 158
From: DFW
Originally Posted by TruckGuy24
a what?
a 29er. (29" wheels mountain bike)
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:53 AM.