GM posts $39B loss

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 01:37 PM
  #1  
Stealth's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
GM posts $39B loss

Wow, not good.

http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-posts...lion-loss.html
 
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 01:42 PM
  #2  
scott1981's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,103
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Wow, thats no good.
 
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 01:44 PM
  #3  
SMIGGS's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: Manitoba, Canada
GM is looking to buy out about 75,000 jobs.

That's alot of coin....
 
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 01:51 PM
  #4  
Bighersh's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
From: North of Dallas, South of Frisco
That's cool of GM to offer to buy them out...

Any other corporation woudl just lay them off. End of story.

On the news they said this was the largest loss in automotive history.


Hmm, I thought GM was going better... Maybe they shouldn't have sold GMAC. At least they still "look" profitable.
 
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 01:58 PM
  #5  
scott1981's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,103
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally Posted by Bighersh
That's cool of GM to offer to buy them out...

Any other corporation woudl just lay them off. End of story.

On the news they said this was the largest loss in automotive history.


Hmm, I thought GM was going better... Maybe they shouldn't have sold GMAC. At least they still "look" profitable.

I have lost hope in big business so something lead's me to believe this buyout is not from the kindness of their heart's. Wouldnt the union protect those workers if GM just tried to up and fire them?
 
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 02:09 PM
  #6  
Oxlander's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
From: Marshall, Tx
Originally Posted by scott1981
I have lost hope in big business so something lead's me to believe this buyout is not from the kindness of their heart's. Wouldnt the union protect those workers if GM just tried to up and fire them?
You are absolutely right.
The goal is not to reduce headcount but rather to bring in new workers at a lower cost.

The current veteran UAW member at GM today has an average base wage of $28.12 an hour, but the cost of benefits, including pension and future retiree health care costs, nearly triples the cost to GM to $78.21, according to the Center for Automotive Research.

By comparison, new hires will be paid between $14 and $16.23 an hour.

http://money.cnn.com/2008/02/12/news...ion=2008021212
So, after the buyout, GM will be replacing these with hourly employees making half the pay and none of the benefits.
 
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 05:27 PM
  #7  
risupercrewman's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,711
Likes: 5
From: Rhode Island
GM is very profitable in the overseas market, however in North America they are loosin their shirts...........
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Feb 12, 2008 | 06:50 PM
  #8  
Stealth's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
Who could afford to take a low paying job and then have to pay for health benefits? Seems like a lose/lose situation for newly hired auto manufacturer workers.
 
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 08:23 PM
  #9  
Bighersh's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
From: North of Dallas, South of Frisco
Originally Posted by scott1981
I have lost hope in big business so something lead's me to believe this buyout is not from the kindness of their heart's. Wouldnt the union protect those workers if GM just tried to up and fire them?
Oh yeah, I'm sure it wasn't out of the kindness of their hearts.

But, I don't think a union can protect you from a layoff. Not completely.

They may do what Ford had proposed, and throw a 100K at them, and see what happens. I mean, offffered the choice between a lump sum check for100K or a layoff package (2-3 months salary, if you're lucky), I'd take the 100K.

But, it's hard to feel sorry for corporate America, or GM. I can only hope for the best for them.
 
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 08:29 PM
  #10  
JBMX928's Avatar
Graphics Contributor
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo NY
.
 
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 09:19 PM
  #11  
Bent6's Avatar
Senior Member
25 Year Member
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 724
Likes: 3
From: Great Lakes
There was a time not so long ago when it looked like American steel companies and workers jobs wouldn't make it past 2000. Now the workers and companies are going great, at least around here. Unfortunately almost all the companies are now foreign owned by Mital from India. The jobs still pay great and the benefits are good, but I wonder what will happen if the steel market slows. Hopefully the US auto industry will have a sucessfull rebirth with American ownership in the near future.
 
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 09:33 PM
  #12  
scott1981's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,103
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally Posted by Bighersh
Oh yeah, I'm sure it wasn't out of the kindness of their hearts.

But, I don't think a union can protect you from a layoff. Not completely.

They may do what Ford had proposed, and throw a 100K at them, and see what happens. I mean, offffered the choice between a lump sum check for100K or a layoff package (2-3 months salary, if you're lucky), I'd take the 100K.

But, it's hard to feel sorry for corporate America, or GM. I can only hope for the best for them.

I agree, unskilled labor should take the 100k and laugh to the bank. Ford, Chevy and the rest did a great thing for America by helping those who were willing to work hard but had no education with decent paying jobs and great benefits. If the American buying public had not turned a blind eye to these jestures these companies would still be able to offer these benefits without going bankrupt. Now the American people don't care if it keeps money or food on American tables. Gone are the days of national pride. Although I do feel these labor workers were overpaid and under qualified they still showed up to work everyday and built some damn good trucks/cars. Sad to see this end
 
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 10:09 PM
  #13  
dkstone05's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 816
Likes: 1
From: Indianapolis, area
Starting at $14 to $16 sounds about right for most of the positions(midwest pay scale). There are some that should be paid more due to skill level. That figure seems to be about average in the midwest for the equilvelent jobs set/skill levels. That's what matters the most is for GM to get back in line, wage wise, with the national average.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:07 PM.