Need grammar help

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 29, 2007 | 11:59 PM
  #1  
Gotts2BMe's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: Sask. Canada
Need grammar help

I am writing an essay right now and need some help

....harmonized agreement so it is win win for both parties....

the part in question is win win. Is that proper grammar?
 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 12:01 AM
  #2  
gators241987's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 0
From: Germantown, TN
im gonna have to second that
 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 12:02 AM
  #3  
ParkM's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
From: Picayune, Ms/Alexandria, La
Originally Posted by Gotts2BMe

....harmonized agreement so it is win win for both parties....

the part in question is win win. Is that proper grammar?
...harmonized agreement, beneficial for both parties...
 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 12:03 AM
  #4  
Gotts2BMe's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: Sask. Canada
yeah it does sound better

how about a word for lose lose
 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 12:07 AM
  #5  
ParkM's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
From: Picayune, Ms/Alexandria, La
would help with the sentence you're using it in
 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 12:09 AM
  #6  
t-rev's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
"It is not beneficial for either party"
 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 12:10 AM
  #7  
Gotts2BMe's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: Sask. Canada
When a crime goes though the courts it is a lose, lose situation for both parties whereas when a crime goes through a restorative justice forum where both the victim and offender come to the harmonized agreement it is beneficial for both parties...
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Nov 30, 2007 | 12:12 AM
  #8  
ParkM's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
From: Picayune, Ms/Alexandria, La
Originally Posted by Gotts2BMe
When a crime goes though the courts it is a lose, lose situation for both parties whereas when a crime goes through a restorative justice forum where both the victim and offender come to the harmonized agreement it is beneficial for both parties...
When a crime goes though the courts, benefiting neither party, whereas when a crime goes through a restorative justice forum where both the victim and offender come to the harmonized agreement it is beneficial for both parties...
 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 12:15 AM
  #9  
t-rev's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
too many beneficials.
 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 12:18 AM
  #10  
ParkM's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
From: Picayune, Ms/Alexandria, La
Originally Posted by ParkM
When a crime goes though the courts, benefiting neither party, whereas when a crime goes through a restorative justice forum where both the victim and offender come to the harmonized agreement it is beneficial for both parties...
When a crime goes though the courts, favoring neither party, whereas when a crime goes through a restorative justice forum where both the victim and offender come to the harmonized agreement it is beneficial for both parties...

better?
 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 12:20 AM
  #11  
CANES676400's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville
when a case goes through the court system neither the victim nor the offender benefiet, whereas a case that proceeds through a restorative justice forum can benefit both by allowing them to come to a harmonized agreement. i think that sounds pretty good
 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 12:20 AM
  #12  
Gotts2BMe's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: Sask. Canada
When a crime goes through the courts it is beneficial for neither party, whereas when a crime goes through a restorative justice forum where both the victim and offender come to the harmonized agreement it is beneficial for both parties.

?
 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 12:23 AM
  #13  
ParkM's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
From: Picayune, Ms/Alexandria, La
Originally Posted by Gotts2BMe
When a crime goes through the courts it is beneficial for neither party, whereas when a crime goes through a restorative justice forum where both the victim and offender come to the harmonized agreement it is beneficial for both parties.

?
When a crime goes through the courts it is beneficial for neither party, whereas when a crime goes through a restorative justice forum where both the victim and offender come to the harmonized agreement, it is beneficial for both parties.
 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 12:23 AM
  #14  
CANES676400's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville
i would use case instead of crime, i also think you should define both parties before reffering to them. kinda like you wouldnt say he before you say Mr smith.
 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 12:35 AM
  #15  
Gotts2BMe's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: Sask. Canada
what do you guys think 1 or 2?


1 - when a case goes through the court system neither the victim nor the offender benefiet, whereas a case that proceeds through a restorative justice forum can benefit both by allowing them to come to a harmonized agreement.

or

2 - When a case goes through the courts it is beneficial for neither party, whereas when a case goes through a restorative justice forum where both the victim and offender come to the harmonized agreement, it is beneficial for both parties.





I also have victim and offender in the sentence right before.... I agree on the "case" rather than "crime"


so 1 or 2?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:24 PM.