They just keep kicking him in the balls....I love it !
They just keep kicking him in the *****....I love it !
The Miami Herald
Posted on Thu, Aug. 09, 2007
O.J. Simpson must pay the family of the late Ronald Goldman any money he earns from a video game featuring him to fulfill a $38 million wrongful death judgment, a judge ruled Tuesday.
The game, All-Pro Football 2K8, features Simpson playing as one of 240 former football stars.
Simpson, who now lives in Kendall, was acquitted of murder in the 1994 killings of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ron Goldman but found liable in civil court.
Simpson owes Goldman's family the $38 million as part of that lawsuit.
The judge's ruling didn't say how much money Simpson might have earned from the video game deal.
I didnt even know he was in the game...
Posted on Thu, Aug. 09, 2007
O.J. Simpson must pay the family of the late Ronald Goldman any money he earns from a video game featuring him to fulfill a $38 million wrongful death judgment, a judge ruled Tuesday.
The game, All-Pro Football 2K8, features Simpson playing as one of 240 former football stars.
Simpson, who now lives in Kendall, was acquitted of murder in the 1994 killings of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ron Goldman but found liable in civil court.
Simpson owes Goldman's family the $38 million as part of that lawsuit.
The judge's ruling didn't say how much money Simpson might have earned from the video game deal.
I didnt even know he was in the game...
Originally Posted by closer9
I never understood how one could be found liable in civil court if acquitted... ???
Originally Posted by kingfish51
Also you can not be triied twice for the same thing in criminal court.
Maybe I am wrong. When the world had ten commandments, only ten things to get wrong. Try keeping up with state and federal laws today!!
Originally Posted by INFireRedF150
I believe you can if there is substantial and convincing new evidence to enter that wasn't available before. It may be up to each state, but I think you can, but there has to be a ruling by a judge on a case presented by a prosecutor first to see if a new trial is warranted. Or maybe it is a change in the conviction sought, but I think there are ways to try the case again, but you are right if the case parameters are either the same as the first time or not different enough for a judge to see if a new trial is worth the public's time.
Maybe I am wrong. When the world had ten commandments, only ten things to get wrong. Try keeping up with state and federal laws today!!
Maybe I am wrong. When the world had ten commandments, only ten things to get wrong. Try keeping up with state and federal laws today!!
Google "double jeopardy and 5th amendment."
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by INFireRedF150
I believe you can if there is substantial and convincing new evidence to enter that wasn't available before. It may be up to each state, but I think you can, but there has to be a ruling by a judge on a case presented by a prosecutor first to see if a new trial is warranted. Or maybe it is a change in the conviction sought, but I think there are ways to try the case again, but you are right if the case parameters are either the same as the first time or not different enough for a judge to see if a new trial is worth the public's time.
Maybe I am wrong. When the world had ten commandments, only ten things to get wrong. Try keeping up with state and federal laws today!!
Maybe I am wrong. When the world had ten commandments, only ten things to get wrong. Try keeping up with state and federal laws today!!



