A dead give away on that one is the tuft of hair left on her shoulder that even in black and white is obvious it doesnt match and is out in the middle of no where.
Also you dont have to see her naked to know that those arent her *****.
I've seen her legs and those arent her legs either.
Also, we know thats not how she is built, it looks lke a pic od a shorter 18 year old with her head slapped on it.

Another way to know is by odds, her nightie scene on Home improvemnt is about as risque as I've ever known her to get. So anything else I'd be skeptical of and really start looking and comparing wehter it was her or not.

 

That's it ! Ive had enough .... See you guys tommorow

::runs out of office::

 

dude you was lookin at all of that. guest this dog was huntin in the wrong patch.

 

too skinny.

 

GOD DANG IT JBMX!!!!!

I just went #3... didnt even have time to stand up and make it to the bathroom!

 

you suppose to go to the bathroom for that

 

The fact that she had more hair on her chest than me, made me really start looking at what was up and hoping to god it was fake.




This dogs been tricked before, he now knows to check out the tail first.

 

I'm at home so it's legal to discharge a fire arm even if it's on accident. It's just much easier to clean up in the bathroom.

 

the "O" look on her face had goin and goin and goin well you get the point

 

There was another fake in there that had a guy in it too in the google search, i didnt click on that, only click on things like that in firefox, dont want any spyware in IE.

 

if it weren't for fakes there would be no hollywood

 

So, now I'm confused...

Did Patricia Richardson really do ****? or is it just a bunch of fake pix on google...?

 

they're fake pics, but the black n white one is a pretty good job at almost looking real.

 

You guys need to get a life..

Way too much time on your hands..

...zap!

 

So what are you saying? This is not quality use of time or that there are better things to do?