Perry Mason, Attorney at Law
9145 Wilshire Blvd.
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
State Bar No: BS1234567
(310) 555 - 1212
Attorney for Kobiashi Partners, LLP
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

[PLAINTIFF(S) NAMES]
Plaintiffs,
Kobi Ashi, President & Chief Executive Officer, Kobiashi Partners, LLP

v.

JamzWayne

[DEFENDANT(S) NAMES]
Defendants
________________________________ )

CASE NO: BH55674

COMPLAINT FOR
INTENTIONAL AND NEGLIGENT EMOTIONAL DISTRESS
Plaintiff complains and for causes of action alleges as follows:
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress with the use of poor grammar and spelling errors.

Defendant JamzWayne is a resident of the Gay State of Texas.

Plaintiff Kobi Ashi is ignorant of the true names and capacities of defendants sued herein as JamzWayne and therefore sues this defendant by such fictitious names. Plaintiff Kobi Ashi will amend this complaint to allege his true name and capacity when ascertained.

FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress with the use of poor grammar and spelling errors.

Defendant JamzWayne knew, or should have known, that his failure to exercise due care in the performance of entering posts on F150online would cause plaintiff Kobi Ashi severe emotional distress. Plaintiff Kobi Ashi (herein known as Kobi) has repeatedly demonstrated these past seven (7) years that he is **** about grammar and spelling. Defendant JamzWayne’s blatant disregard for grammar and spelling, along with his taunting in the form of a dare to sue, has caused plaintiff Kobi severe emotional distress.

As a further proximate result of defendant Jamz Wayne’s disregard of grammar and spelling, and the consequences proximately caused by it, as hereinabove alleged , plaintiff suffered severe emotional distress and mental suffering in the sum of $1,000,000.00.

WHEREFORE, plaintiff prays judgment against defendant as follows:

1. For general damages for severe emotional distress and mental suffering in the sum of $1,000,000.00;
2. For medical and related expenses in the sum of $ xxx[ according to proof];
3. [---For lost wages in the sum of $ xxx[ according to proof];
4. [---For $ xxx[ according to proof];
5. For costs of suit herein incurred; and
6. For such other and further relief as the court may deem proper.
DATED: 05-21-2007 Kobi Ashi
(Signature)

 

dear kobi,


hereinabove is too words, herein above thank you.

 

Ridge -

Before you correct someone, you may want to take a moment and make sure you know what you're talking about.

Go get a dictionary. Look it up. If you are without a decent dictionary, go to dictionary.com.

And by the way, when referring to the number, it's "two".

:santa:

 

dont really care how i spell as im not at work so im not getting paid for my spelling and grammar but its herein above, not hereinabove... i dont need to look it up.

 

Kobi just burnt him like toast.

 

I think 'herein above' is a warning that you're about to git crapped on the head.

 

Whoa whoa whoa, you're opening a can of worms with a statement like that

 

Same difference yes, however most spell check programs will ask to replace hereinabove with herein above, which would mean its two words.

 

"Herein Above!" "Herein Above!"

Oops, too late.

 

Most spell check programs??? Does that means some spell check programs wouldn't ask you to replace it? So if you happened to be using one of those programs then it would be OK? Dude, if you trust spell check programs and let them influence how you write, well . . . how sad.

I don't have to look it up either, but, to help the spelling challenged such as yourself, let's go to Webster . . .

Oh crap!!!! Look at that!!!

 

how about you look at the law dictionary also its also spelled herein above.. like i said it can go either way, but most programs will say hereinabove is a error and ask that it be replaced with herein above

 

...
(^^^ 'cause my sig is everywhere )

 

freak

 

Did you draw that up in paint?

 

<--click me.