Continuing the Drove a Ridgeline Thread...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 12:08 PM
  #31  
scott1981's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,103
Likes: 0
From: Houston
[QUOTE=Bighersh]
Originally Posted by scott1981

I think it would've had a solid axle if it had been intended to match wits with the F-150, but this tow rating is only 2/3rds to 1/2 that of an F-150, so they aren't in the same class. The only place they come close is on payload rating.

Like someone said, this truck/vehicle was intended to be an alternative to the SportTrac, Fronteir, Colorado, etc...I think when/if Honda decides to build a competitor to the F-150, it will have the right stuff.
The colorado is a joke with its I-5, but the frontier and new sporttrac both are rated to tow more than the ridgeline. Sadly they are not only rated to tow more but they are compact trucks. Just because the capability of the ridgeline is less than that of a half-ton, and most compacts, does not mean it is not a half-ton truck; just that it sucks. Honda did not want to invest the money in building a real truck so they stole the platform from the MDX and half assed it. Lets stop making excuses for this thing and admit its a joke
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 12:16 PM
  #32  
Zaairman's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,843
Likes: 0
From: St. Charles, MO
Originally Posted by BigHersh
Ridgeline Description: From Honda

By now, you've seen the Honda Ridgeline, the half-ton truck that loves rough roads and offers plenty of versatile cargo room. But maybe it's time for a closer look. Because whether you're hauling big payloads or tackling the rugged terrain, the 2007 Ridgeline is ready to impress.

A 5,000-lb. towing capacity and 1,550-lb. total payload capacity will never leave you wanting more. The Ridgeline boasts this exceptional strength from an integrated closed-box frame with unit-body construction and powerful, 247-hp, V-6 engine with 4-wheel independent suspension.
Looks like we can compare it to the F-150
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 02:35 PM
  #33  
Bighersh's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
From: North of Dallas, South of Frisco
Originally Posted by Zaairman
Looks like we can compare it to the F-150
I guess we can, in terms of payload capacity.

In terms of size is where the EPA rates them, they are not. There will be those who like it, and those who don't. For a time, I even considered one, but couldn't bring myself to buy one.

Nevertheless, once you remove emotion from the equation, as well as visual aesthetics, nothing said so far changes the fact that for what a lot of people do with a truck, this truck is functionally adequate, if not pretty, solid axled, V-8, or body on frame.

I'd argue the Ridgeline is every bit as much "truck", no matter how we care to describe it, as the 1997 - 2003 V-6 F-150, except in size.

Didn't toyota build a litte-bitty truck years ago that was a 1/2 - 1-ton?
Side by side:
...................................Ridgeline RTL, Moonroof/XM..............F-150 SuperCrew Lariat
Estimated Market Price.............$31,283.37...................... ............ $30,985.82
Invoice.................................. $29,341.00.................................. $29,457.00
List Price.................................$32,640.00.. ................................ $33,140.00
Vehicle Class........................... Small Pickup................................. Large Pickup
Overall Satisfaction.................. Rating 75 out of 100...................... 90 out of 100


Performance

.............................................Ridgeline....................F-150 SuperCrew Lariat
Engine................................... 3.5L 6 Cylinder........................5.4L 8 Cylinder...............4.6L
Drive .....................................4WD-FT................................. RWD ...........................RWD
Transmission..........................5 speed Automatic OD............. 4 speed Auto. OD..........(" ")
Compression Ratio................. 10.00:1.................................. 9.80:1 ........................9.40:1
Horsepower........................... 247 hp @5750rpm................. 300 hp @5000rpm .......231 HP
Torque.................................. 245@ 4500............................. 365@ 3750 ..................293 @ 3500 RPM
Bore.................................. ...3.50....................................... 3.55 .............................(" ")
Stroke.................................. 3.66....................................... 4.17 .............................3.54
Fuel Capacity.......................22.00 gallons............................. 30.00 gallons.................(" ")
Fuel Type............................Unleaded.............. ..................... Unleaded ......................(" ")
Fuel Delivery...................... MPFI......................................... SEFI ............................(" ")
MPG City................................. 16....................................... 14 ............................... 15
MPG Highway.......................... 21....................................... 19 ............................... 19

Specifications

.............................................Ridgeline....................F-150 SuperCrew Lariat
Wheelbase..................................122.0".......... ....... 138.5"................................ 138.5"
Overall Length.............................206.8"............... .. 223.8" ................................223.8"
Vehicle Height...............................71.2".............. ... 73.4" ............................... 73.4"
Vehicle Width............................... 77.8"................. 78.9" ............................... 78.9"
Seating Capacity............................... 5....................... 6 ............................... 6
Cargo Capacity (Cars).....................N/A .....................N/A ............................... N/A
Front Headroom (Cars).................. 38.7" ................. 40.1" ............................. 40.1"
Front Legroom (Cars).................... 40.8".................. 41.3" ............................... 41.3"
Rear Legroom............................... 36.4".................. 39.0" ............................. 39.0"
Payload Capacity (Trucks)............. 1554................... 1710 .............................. 1570
Gross Weight (Trucks).................. 6050 lbs.............. 7050 lbs. .........................6800 lbs.
Towing Capacity (Trucks).............. 5000................... 8000 ...............................6300 lbs
Final Assembly Location................. CDN..................... USA .................................USA
 

Last edited by Bighersh; Dec 20, 2006 at 03:28 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 02:53 PM
  #34  
Raoul's Avatar
Certified Goat Breeder
25 Year Member
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 6,182
Likes: 19
From: the moral high ground
Originally Posted by Bighersh
...Didn't toyota build a litte-bitty truck years ago that was a 1/2 - 1-ton?...
Yes, Toyota dropped the long-bed One Ton in 1993. It had massiive springs for a little truck with a payload around 2500 lbs.
It was when the T100 came out and it would have baffled their customers and made their salesmen stammer and stumble.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 02:55 PM
  #35  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 82
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Originally Posted by Raoul
Yes, Toyota dropped the long-bed One Ton in 1993. It had massiive springs for a little truck with a payload around 2500 lbs.
It was when the T100 came out and it would have baffled their customers and made their salesmen stammer and stumble.
they do anyhow, so that was not the cause.
 
__________________
Jim
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 02:58 PM
  #36  
Raoul's Avatar
Certified Goat Breeder
25 Year Member
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 6,182
Likes: 19
From: the moral high ground
Originally Posted by bluejay432000
they do anyhow, so that was not the cause.
Yes well, imagine a Ford salesman trying to talk a customer up to an F150 (payload 1710) when a Ranger is sitting next to it (payload 2550).
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 03:01 PM
  #37  
F150 Duke's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,009
Likes: 0
From: In a van down by the river
Originally Posted by Bighersh
Now, that's funny right there... I don't care who you are.

Side note: A guy here said he read that "Larry The Cable Guy", makes $1,000,000.00 a month in licensing revenue from T-Shirt's and other logos with "Git 'er Done" on it.

If that's true, damn! Talk about an easy way to get rich!
Hey Hersh,

Well I'm not going to even comment on Matt as that would be giving an individual time and thought that is not deserved.

However, on the Larry the Cable guy thing I have to be a bit skeptical. First, one million a month is quite a bit. Two, that would mimic Trump's attempt to do the same thing to "You're fired" and that failed miserably.

If it is true, I would be the most pissed off southerner living in MN right now. I grew up in Florida and we used "Git-R- Done" since middle school. That was LONG before Larry the Cable guy even though he was funny.

Duke
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 03:37 PM
  #38  
Bighersh's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
From: North of Dallas, South of Frisco
Originally Posted by F150 Duke
Hey Hersh,

Well I'm not going to even comment on Matt as that would be giving an individual time and thought that is not deserved.

However, on the Larry the Cable guy thing I have to be a bit skeptical. First, one million a month is quite a bit. Two, that would mimic Trump's attempt to do the same thing to "You're fired" and that failed miserably.

If it is true, I would be the most pissed off southerner living in MN right now. I grew up in Florida and we used "Git-R- Done" since middle school. That was LONG before Larry the Cable guy even though he was funny.

Duke
I agree... I asked him where he read that, he couldn't recall.

I mentioned it here, thinking someone could qualify it. I searched IMDB and Wikipedia and foung nothing about Lawrence Whitney's income. All I know is he's originally from Nebraska, he's 5' 10", has lived outside Orlando Florida for 27 years, and has a house in Lincoln, Nebraska, is coming out with a new movie called Delta Farce. Oh, and he loves the Nebraska Cornhuskers, having purchased a luxury suite in the northern end zone of the field...

Luxury suites at a college stadium? The again, as cold as it can get in Nebraska, the whole frakin' stadium should be a luxury suite.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 06:57 PM
  #39  
scott1981's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,103
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally Posted by Bighersh
I guess we can, in terms of payload capacity.

In terms of size is where the EPA rates them, they are not. There will be those who like it, and those who don't. For a time, I even considered one, but couldn't bring myself to buy one.

Nevertheless, once you remove emotion from the equation, as well as visual aesthetics, nothing said so far changes the fact that for what a lot of people do with a truck, this truck is functionally adequate, if not pretty, solid axled, V-8, or body on frame.

I'd argue the Ridgeline is every bit as much "truck", no matter how we care to describe it, as the 1997 - 2003 V-6 F-150, except in size.

Didn't toyota build a litte-bitty truck years ago that was a 1/2 - 1-ton?
Side by side:
so is this truck in need of its own special catagory? Honda advertises it as a half ton truck. Even if we cut it a break and list it with the compacts it still falls short in areas that true truck users need. I tow, haul and use 4wd on a weekly basis. a ridgeline would never cope with the abuse I dish out for anything near 100k. I may not be the average truck user but I still hate to see vehicles take such a direction regardless of who uses them. The ridgeline represents the pussification of the 1/2 truck.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 07:53 PM
  #40  
F150 Duke's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,009
Likes: 0
From: In a van down by the river
Originally Posted by Bighersh
I agree... I asked him where he read that, he couldn't recall.

I mentioned it here, thinking someone could qualify it. I searched IMDB and Wikipedia and foung nothing about Lawrence Whitney's income. All I know is he's originally from Nebraska, he's 5' 10", has lived outside Orlando Florida for 27 years, and has a house in Lincoln, Nebraska, is coming out with a new movie called Delta Farce. Oh, and he loves the Nebraska Cornhuskers, having purchased a luxury suite in the northern end zone of the field...

Luxury suites at a college stadium? The again, as cold as it can get in Nebraska, the whole frakin' stadium should be a luxury suite.
geese that would be nice to have my own luxury stadium.

Duke
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 08:02 PM
  #41  
89Lariat's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by scott1981
so is this truck in need of its own special catagory? Honda advertises it as a half ton truck. Even if we cut it a break and list it with the compacts it still falls short in areas that true truck users need. I tow, haul and use 4wd on a weekly basis. a ridgeline would never cope with the abuse I dish out for anything near 100k. I may not be the average truck user but I still hate to see vehicles take such a direction regardless of who uses them. The ridgeline represents the pussification of the 1/2 truck.
I wouldnt even want to try and use a ridgeline for what I did with the Ranger, Explorer, and the 150. Seeing those POS reminds me of when my buddy and me watched as two dumbass pretty boys tried to take daddy's lexus suv through a river diversion and got it stuck halfway. Neither of them wanted to get out and walk through to get a tow cable. Little off topic but shows what these "trucks" really are good for, nothing.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 09:54 PM
  #42  
zapster's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 851
Likes: 1
From: ....I could be anywhere....


...zap!
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 07:07 AM
  #43  
gryph00f150's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
[QUOTE=scott1981]
Originally Posted by gryph00f150

This post is way off track. First yes a CV does see more strain when a load is applied in the bed. What do you think is moving that added weight foward? The power transferred through the drive train, part of that is the CV joint. Then you go on to say the rear CV joint doesnt see any stress unless the VTM applies power to the rear diff. Then the power is still going through the front CV! CV joints are on all 4 corners on this piece. Lastly CV's can not handle the same stress and torque a solid axle can, end of story
So you're saying that a CV joint is weak. I would respond by saying that the joint is only as weak as the design. The h1 has a payload of over 3,000 lbs and a towing capacity of over 8,000. Oh yeah it has cv joints. And once again NO, the payload sitting in the bed does not put any stress onto the cv joints. If you can explain how it does, then I would love to hear it.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 08:32 AM
  #44  
1depd's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 691
Likes: 1
From: Gulf Coast
Originally Posted by gryph00f150
And once again NO, the payload sitting in the bed does not put any stress onto the cv joints. If you can explain how it does, then I would love to hear it.
It's the whole inertia thing. I think it was Issac Newton who stated, things in motion tend to stay in motion and things at rest tend to stay at rest, unless some outside force acts upon it. The amount of force needed to move 3000 lbs is greater than the force required to move 1500 lbs. This extra force as to be transmitted through something and in the case of the Ridgeline it is transmitted through the CV joints.

The payload just sitting there without moving the truck doesn't put any stress on the CV joints. The only time the joints are stressed is when the vehicle must move or the engine is used for braking. But then if the truck was just sitting there it would be undergoing very little stress on anything.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 10:05 AM
  #45  
scott1981's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,103
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally Posted by 1depd
It's the whole inertia thing. I think it was Issac Newton who stated, things in motion tend to stay in motion and things at rest tend to stay at rest, unless some outside force acts upon it. The amount of force needed to move 3000 lbs is greater than the force required to move 1500 lbs. This extra force as to be transmitted through something and in the case of the Ridgeline it is transmitted through the CV joints.

The payload just sitting there without moving the truck doesn't put any stress on the CV joints. The only time the joints are stressed is when the vehicle must move or the engine is used for braking. But then if the truck was just sitting there it would be undergoing very little stress on anything.
Yup
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:52 PM.