bombing of Iran soon???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 9, 2006 | 02:53 AM
  #1  
buckdropper's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 918
Likes: 0
From: south western NYS Latitude: 42.34 N, Longitude: 78.46 W
bombing of Iran soon???

http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ne...icle356679.ece
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2006 | 03:02 AM
  #2  
northernnorm's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Yukon, Canada
And what would it hurt? He may as well bomb something. He hasn't sent troops into a foreign country in a while, now.
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2006 | 03:20 AM
  #3  
sleddogg's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: Beaverton,MI
Yeah, believe that and I guess ya will believe anything the liberal media says.

I dont doubt that he might not have said that the only way to change Iran is to bomb the hell out of them, and that it has been looked at for its feasability, but just dont see it happening in the time W has left in office.

Sled...
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2006 | 03:45 AM
  #4  
buckdropper's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 918
Likes: 0
From: south western NYS Latitude: 42.34 N, Longitude: 78.46 W
Originally Posted by sleddogg
Yeah, believe that and I guess ya will believe anything the liberal media says.

I dont doubt that he might not have said that the only way to change Iran is to bomb the hell out of them, and that it has been looked at for its feasability, but just dont see it happening in the time W has left in office.

Sled...
I agree sledd. But this guys does things that are never normal.. so....
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2006 | 11:17 AM
  #5  
01 XLT Sport's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,867
Likes: 0
From: NH
It’s always a good thing to have a “doer” in office then a “talker”…

Clinton = talker = many terrorist hits against America targets such as battleships and the Trade Centers.

Bush = doer = terrorist on the run, unable or extremely difficult to hit America targets at home…

I don’t know about the others but I’d rather not have someone wagging the dog telling us about his feelings and letting people die and America interest take major hits.

I’d rather have someone that doesn’t talk much beating the crap out of the bad guys…

A great President once said:

Walk quietly and carry a big stick…
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2006 | 11:23 AM
  #6  
01 XLT Sport's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,867
Likes: 0
From: NH
WASHINGTON — The Bush administration, which publicly advocates negotiations to halt Iran's nuclear program, is accelerating military planning for possible attacks against Iran and has not ruled out using tactical nuclear weapons, according to a new article.


Excellent it’s about time EVERYTHING is on the table. Let them nutcases in the Middle East know and understand this is the real world and if they continue on their goofy path to destruction we will help accelerate it for them…
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2006 | 11:39 AM
  #7  
98Lariet4x4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Maybe I will go back to a 'Boomer' submarine....
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Apr 9, 2006 | 12:04 PM
  #8  
Sgt.Pepper's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: SE Washington
More war games. The daily policeing of Iraq is getting old and the flyboys need a job to go do.
Gitrdone.
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2006 | 01:20 PM
  #9  
nvrenuff's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
From: Airdrie, AB
The nuclear option doesn't really exist in this day and age for any western country, can you imagine the humanitarian backlash world wide because of all the dead innocent civilians and the pics that would be all over CNN. It is used as a deterent only and would never be ruled out PUBLICLY as an option.
The Iranians are truly bezerk, and with any luck, their reactor will blow up due to someone leaving a camel unattended and licking the wrong lever, lets just hope it happens very soon. Do we have any camel trainers in here, we could create an accident.
BTW, whatever happened to the little N Korean psycho leader, he seems to have been laying low lately.
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2006 | 01:40 PM
  #10  
6T6CPE's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: Jersey shore
Originally Posted by 01 XLT Sport
It’s always a good thing to have a “doer” in office then a “talker”…

Clinton = talker = many terrorist hits against America targets such as battleships and the Trade Centers.
For some reason I thought the Trade Centers collapsed under the Bush administration.

Might as well attack Iran. Bush needs to get the attention off his Iraq mess.
Hell, he might as well try to conquer the world. Bring the draft back. I'm sure his approval rating will sky rocket.
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2006 | 02:33 PM
  #11  
01 XLT Sport's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,867
Likes: 0
From: NH
Originally Posted by 6T6CPE
For some reason I thought the Trade Centers collapsed under the Bush administration.

Might as well attack Iran. Bush needs to get the attention off his Iraq mess.
Hell, he might as well try to conquer the world. Bring the draft back. I'm sure his approval rating will sky rocket.
While that is true, the first attempt at the trade centers was during Clinton’s term. Many places were attacked, such as the United States Naval ship, during Clinton’s term. Since Clinton was a talker only it lead terrorist to believe that America would never stand up to them.

That said fact of 8 years of basically doing nothing because we had a talker in office led to the trade centers being destroyed and killing thousands of people while a “doer” was in office.

What was unfortunate for the terrorist is that when they decided to kill thousands of people they didn’t really realize that Bush was a “doer” rather then a talker.

Many Americans who are upset with Bush are nothing more then “talkers” themselves, such as the liberals and many democrats. When is the last time you actually seen any liberals “doing” anything on their own, or standing their own ground?

Fact is they don’t, they talk and when they decide to do something they really don’t do anything other then take (steal) other peoples money and give it to other “talkers”….

Liberals never stand their own ground which was evident since Bush took office. Most of the liberals like John F’n Kerry, Kennedy, Algore and the others were all for what Bush had done EXCEPT they were for it when a talker was in office (Clinton). Once Clinton left and Bush actually carried out what they supposedly stood for their story changed, or in other words they didn’t have the guts to stand up on principle or stand their ground…

Bush = principle.
Clinton = make people happy by talking to them and telling them what ever they want to hear.

When you don’t stand your ground, like Clinton and liberals are famous for people know they can overrun you with very little problems. Thus the reason terrorist basically had free run to do as they pleased where ever they wished including in America, the first attempt on the trade centers, and an American Naval ship not to mention many other such documented cases…

The saddest moment in the past 20 years for America was the day an American war ship got attacked and America did nothing but “talk” about it…
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2006 | 02:45 PM
  #12  
98Lariet4x4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
01XLT,

It's a shame more people don't realize this... I pretty much agree with most of what you say. I wish Bush had it easier to do some of the things he wants to. It's got to be a tough job fighting the Dem's everytime he wants to make a difference. For too long I've listened to people down him, thank you for standing up. I've always supported him, but I'm convinced this will be our last 'doer' pres. in quite a while. Think that there are enough realists to make a differnce in this country's direction?
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2006 | 04:36 PM
  #13  
01 XLT Sport's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,867
Likes: 0
From: NH
Originally Posted by 98Lariet4x4
01XLT,
Think that there are enough realists to make a differnce in this country's direction?
Absolutely, the majority of Americans are realist but they just don’t have the courage and/or time to try and make a difference. That or they have been programmed to believe they could never make a difference.

The other problem, while most Americans are realist, is they just don’t take the time to understand what is really happening around them. For example it’s well known the mass media is slanted well to the left. There are great examples of it everywhere with the latest in a post here about NBC trying to make news and slant it in such a way they wished to report it rather then doing a professional job and simply “reporting” on news.

Another example was a very uneducated and morally corrupt black congressmen. Don’t recall her name as that is not important because she’s a waste of human flesh but she decided she would make her own rules, as liberals generally do, and do things her way. You see liberals like to make two sets of rules, ones for us and ones for them.

She decided she was going to play by her own rules and bypass security measures. When that failed and she was pulled back and then she claimed racism, that she got abused because she was black. That is what the liberal media reported rather then the TRUTH which was she was a moron with no brain, had little education and was morally corrupt and the officer done his job. He should of beat her down like a dog so the next person who thought about bypassing clearly known security measures would have thought twice about it.

Any one like me who could of got on TV and stated those very facts would have been drowned out by other morons claiming I was racist for reporting the facts and only the facts.

That’s the problem, there is a very small minority in this country, liberals, who control much of the agenda and almost complete mind control. Mind control in that they have so many “realist” fearful to speak out because they would get shouted down by name calling and character assassination.

Look at Bush and the morons who claim he lied about why we went to Iraq. That he lied about the weapons of mass destruction. Those who truly believe that are morons, which means they have very little education and absolutely no skills when it comes to simple research.

It’s now a well known fact that the intelligence was wrong, it was wrong during Clinton’s term and for Bush’s term. The same people were in the intelligent agency for both Clinton and Bush. It’s was the ONLY source of information that either Clinton or Bush had to go on so what was either to do?

Clinton talked about it, based off the intelligence, and Bush acted on it, the very SAME intelligence. So no one lied about it and most certainly Bush did NOT lie about anything but the morons will continue to believe it because they rely on others to do their thinking and while that is the case for many Americans realist have a slim chance of ever making a difference…
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2006 | 05:08 PM
  #14  
98Lariet4x4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Originally Posted by CrAz3D
Yup, this is why I'm going into politics...looks like fun. Not like "whoo, I'm playing a game fun" more of a "whoo, I'm doing something good" fun.

Everything is about politics, it shouldn't be.
That has got to be one of the most ridiculous bumperstickers ever, same with the "What Would Jesus Bomb" one I saw (I almost keyed that dude's car).

Bush didn't have much time to do anything about terrorists, Clinton had time but it was totally unexpected. We ought just look at where the terrorists "got throught he system" & fix that by any means necessary.


As far as invading places vs. not invading...if we invade people criticize because it isnt humane,or something. If we dont invade then people complain tha twe're just letting this horrible crime against humanity go on.....or w/e, its just retarded
Being that's it 'just retarted' what is your plan of action to help correct the problem?
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2006 | 05:08 PM
  #15  
Peacemaker's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 0
Simply put, it's just a good old fashioned battle of good vs. evil. Those two opposing forces have collided since mankind was created. It will continue on until Iran tries to destroy Isreal. You that have read the Bible know what the prophecy says will happen after that event takes place. Tick...Tock...
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:23 AM.