IT(Network Guys) what would you do?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 05:19 PM
  #31  
RandallT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
From: NN
Originally Posted by rutherk1
Sounds pretty sweet.

Your school must have some $ to blow. Regan was president when I was in middle school. I think our text books went up to Kennedy . The teachers just made up the rest. Now students have 100Mbps connection at their desk?
Pretty awesome.

You know. Maybe you should hold off. Nostradamus predicted the end of days following a global sharing of information (the internet).

It's actually DHS, and the school is for Military only, so, yep I guess the Gov't does have allot of money to blow(our tax dollars)...

We actually were in the process about 4 years ago of running fiber to the desktop, but the users kept kicking the NIC's and wall plates of their cubes and breaking stuff, so we decided it was too much money to keep replacing all of that. We only tested on Dept of about 30 people at the time, and we could only imagine the cost of doing 2K users.

Also, I am trying to be the sole person to bring down the entire world....per Nostradamus.....
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 05:25 PM
  #32  
svermill's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs
Originally Posted by RandallT
We actually were in the process about 4 years ago of running fiber to the desktop, but the users kept kicking the NIC's and wall plates of their cubes and breaking stuff, so we decided it was too much money to keep replacing all of that.
You can use furniture that keeps this from happening, but it is an added expense. A few years back I was the lead network engineer for a new headquarters building with over 1,000 users. Almost every single user had three different network connections (networks were totally isolated from each other). They were ALL fiber.
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 05:39 PM
  #33  
svermill's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs
http://whatis.techtarget.com/definit...499008,00.html

Interesting link. From my perspective, their use of "Mbps" is wrong (but I acknowledge that I'm pretty much alone in the world on this). Strangely, they are careful to point out that the use of lowercase "k" is appropriate when it's 10^3 being discussed vs. 2^10.

Check out the "*" note about "not generally used to express data speed."
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 05:56 PM
  #34  
svermill's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs
According to this exerpt from a "Metric System FAQ" I found (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/metric-system-faq.txt), I am in violation of international protocol:

1.12 What is the correct way of writing metric units?
------------------------------------------------------

Each unit and prefix in the International System of Units has an
official symbol (abbreviation) assigned to it. This symbol is
identical in all languages. When writing down numeric quantities,
especially in the more formal context of product descriptions,
documentation, signs, scientific publications, etc., it is important
to pay some attention to the accurate writing of the unit symbol.

Here are the most important rules for abbreviating SI units:

- Use exactly the standard symbols for prefixes and units listed
in the tables above. Do not invent your own abbreviations.

- Remember that there is a simple system for deciding which letters
are uppercase or lowercase:

- Symbols of units named after a person start uppercase.
(E.g., newton, volt, weber use N, V, Wb.)
- Other units start lowercase.
(E.g., metre, second, lux use m, s, lx.)

- Symbols of prefixes greater than 10³ (kilo) start uppercase.

- All other prefix symbols start with a lowercase letter.
- Further letters in a unit or prefix are always lowercase.

(Correct examples: kHz, MHz)

Oh the shame!
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:16 AM.