The First UFO - What do you guys think?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 04:40 PM
  #1  
jamzwayne's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,336
Likes: 1
From: Your moms house
The First UFO - What do you guys think?

This was sent to me in an email, and I thought I'd share it. I am undecided, and was wondering what you folks think. I has to do with the attack on 9/11.

The First UFO

I avoided all the sensationalist garbage centered around the World Trade Center attack but this
stuff was kind of strange.
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 04:52 PM
  #2  
wstahlm80's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
From: ???.....depends on the day
sweet...
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 04:58 PM
  #3  
cia-agent's Avatar
Bighersh Alter-Ego
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: 33.02N / 96.66W
That probably was that F-15 that they'd sent to intercept the plane(s).

The official sai the F-15 was inbound traveling at 515 MPH when the second plane smashed into the trade center... When that was broadcast on TV, I said back then- why in the fock would the F-15 be coming from where it was (300 miles away) at a speed of 515 MPH, when it has a top speed of 1,750 MPH.

If your goal is to intercept something (That can travel over 500 MPH itself), you're gonna have to fly [i[faster[/i] than that to catch it.

Especially when it has a 300 mile head-start.

So, that was probably the F-15 that they sent... Johnny come lately.
Either that, a real UFO, or this video is BS...
 

Last edited by cia-agent; Aug 26, 2005 at 05:01 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 05:04 PM
  #4  
Redroush98's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
errr, okay.... that is strange, wonder what it is??? Or why it was there??? Maybe there is some better footage, you can barely see it from so far away.
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 05:04 PM
  #5  
mattadams's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 1997
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
From: Littleton, CO USA
I thinks omeone sneezed near the camera, LOL.
Seriously though its just like those that swore that a plane didn't go into the pentagon, a rocket had, because there was no "holes" of the engine in the side of the pentagon. Come on folks, learn a little bit about what happens when something crashes at that speed, LOL.
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 05:04 PM
  #6  
jamzwayne's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,336
Likes: 1
From: Your moms house
Originally Posted by cia-agent
... SNIP ...
Either that, a real UFO, or this video is BS...

Thats what I am thinking...someone is bored and trying to stir some chit up. If this was a true event, then why havent we heard of this until now?

NEXT
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 05:07 PM
  #7  
3valve's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: Paragould Arkansas
Yeah debris or a camera fart is what I'm saying.
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 05:15 PM
  #8  
cia-agent's Avatar
Bighersh Alter-Ego
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: 33.02N / 96.66W
But, I DO believe we shot down TWA Flight 700 over the Atlantic in 1996...

They came up with all kinds of BS around that one...

If I remember the "Expert" that was intervieed, he said something like this: "The 747 has a huge tank in it's belly, and that tank wasn't filled. Therefore, we believe a spark from somewhere ignighted the fumes and resulted in the explosion that brought the plane down... As you know, fumes are what's flammable, not the fuel itself.

My BS-Detector was going "ape-*****" as I listened to that. I mean, I know the 747 has a long range- but- with a 4-engined aircraft, that may be required to 'take a number' in a holding pattern for an hour or two before landing, if there is inclement weather on the other end; doesn't seem prudent that that plane woudl take off with a main fuel tank, empty...

Witnesses saw a streak of light come in contact with that plane before it exploded... I think a Navy ship doing a missle drill, probably targeted that plane on purpose- but fired accidentally... (Withdrawn: Possibly classified information)

The USS Vincent (sp) shot down an Airbus over the Persian Gulf many years ago... IF it happened once, it can happen again. We even had the audacity to say the plane's passengers were dead already... (Who comes up with this BS?) Who would fly a plane load of dead-folks at a Navy ship?) Then they said the radar on teh ship told the crew that the approaching plane was an Iranian/Iraqi F-14 Tomcat. They hailed it to change course, and it didn't- so they blasted them...

I mean; if I'm on the ship and that's really what happened- then yes- shoot those SOB's down.. As we learned in WWII and as the British learned courtesy of the air-launched Exocet anti-ship missle~ an aircraft can make short work of a ship at sea- one cannot take chances... I just struggle that the radar thought an Airbus passenger plance was an F-14 (Unless the transponder was broadcasting a military/F-14 signature)

But, if you make a mistake- at least own up to it....

That's all I'm saying...
 

Last edited by cia-agent; Aug 26, 2005 at 05:32 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 05:19 PM
  #9  
mattadams's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 1997
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
From: Littleton, CO USA
in this sue-happy society, I'm sure if government did admit blaim in somethign like that they'd get sued and probably peoples families would all win hundreds of millions.
FYI, two kids in my high school lost both their parents on that flight. Very sad.
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 09:19 PM
  #10  
ViperGrendal's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
From: FL
Look at the frames in the shot. That frame(s) are just as the second plane hits. Notice that the fire ball (comming from the building without the black smoke) does not change in size even a little bit. I call complete BS on this one.
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 10:00 PM
  #11  
RockyJSquirrel's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 2
*cough* bull***** *cough*
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 11:46 PM
  #12  
inbred's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
From: Lancaster, PA
Found a better copy!!!

Found a better copy...

Looks like it's just TritonXLT's drive by wire stuck again...
 
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2005 | 01:48 AM
  #13  
jamzwayne's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,336
Likes: 1
From: Your moms house
Originally Posted by inbred
Found a better copy...

Looks like it's just TritonXLT's drive by wire stuck again...
inbred, that's cool.

Nice work.
 
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2005 | 11:05 PM
  #14  
lonnie brown's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: Alberta, Canada
Clever.....but insenseative.....any how that object after the impact could have been the planes wing, Prior to impact a reflection of the plane a shadow or reflection...Thier is a lot that will be hidden from the public abought sept 11....at the time thier were rumors that US government did this on purpose, I don't beleave it but the fact that the twin towers stood as a long as they did lessoned the damage, If they had come down right on impact, damage would have been a lot more extensive...Aniversery of SEPT 11 is close at hand....
 
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2005 | 11:09 PM
  #15  
JJG052590's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,922
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery, Alabama!
Ehh, I don't believe it lol
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:18 PM.