The First UFO - What do you guys think?
The First UFO - What do you guys think?
This was sent to me in an email, and I thought I'd share it. I am undecided, and was wondering what you folks think. I has to do with the attack on 9/11.
The First UFO
The First UFO
I avoided all the sensationalist garbage centered around the World Trade Center attack but this
stuff was kind of strange.
stuff was kind of strange.
That probably was that F-15 that they'd sent to intercept the plane(s).
The official sai the F-15 was inbound traveling at 515 MPH when the second plane smashed into the trade center... When that was broadcast on TV, I said back then- why in the fock would the F-15 be coming from where it was (300 miles away) at a speed of 515 MPH, when it has a top speed of 1,750 MPH.
If your goal is to intercept something (That can travel over 500 MPH itself), you're gonna have to fly [i[faster[/i] than that to catch it.
Especially when it has a 300 mile head-start.
So, that was probably the F-15 that they sent... Johnny come lately.
Either that, a real UFO, or this video is BS...
The official sai the F-15 was inbound traveling at 515 MPH when the second plane smashed into the trade center... When that was broadcast on TV, I said back then- why in the fock would the F-15 be coming from where it was (300 miles away) at a speed of 515 MPH, when it has a top speed of 1,750 MPH.
If your goal is to intercept something (That can travel over 500 MPH itself), you're gonna have to fly [i[faster[/i] than that to catch it.
Especially when it has a 300 mile head-start.
So, that was probably the F-15 that they sent... Johnny come lately.
Either that, a real UFO, or this video is BS...
Last edited by cia-agent; Aug 26, 2005 at 05:01 PM.
I thinks omeone sneezed near the camera, LOL.
Seriously though its just like those that swore that a plane didn't go into the pentagon, a rocket had, because there was no "holes" of the engine in the side of the pentagon. Come on folks, learn a little bit about what happens when something crashes at that speed, LOL.
Seriously though its just like those that swore that a plane didn't go into the pentagon, a rocket had, because there was no "holes" of the engine in the side of the pentagon. Come on folks, learn a little bit about what happens when something crashes at that speed, LOL.
Originally Posted by cia-agent
... SNIP ...
Either that, a real UFO, or this video is BS...
Either that, a real UFO, or this video is BS...
Thats what I am thinking...someone is bored and trying to stir some chit up. If this was a true event, then why havent we heard of this until now?
NEXT
Trending Topics
But, I DO believe we shot down TWA Flight 700 over the Atlantic in 1996...
They came up with all kinds of BS around that one...
If I remember the "Expert" that was intervieed, he said something like this: "The 747 has a huge tank in it's belly, and that tank wasn't filled. Therefore, we believe a spark from somewhere ignighted the fumes and resulted in the explosion that brought the plane down... As you know, fumes are what's flammable, not the fuel itself.
My BS-Detector was going "ape-*****" as I listened to that. I mean, I know the 747 has a long range- but- with a 4-engined aircraft, that may be required to 'take a number' in a holding pattern for an hour or two before landing, if there is inclement weather on the other end; doesn't seem prudent that that plane woudl take off with a main fuel tank, empty...
Witnesses saw a streak of light come in contact with that plane before it exploded... I think a Navy ship doing a missle drill, probably targeted that plane on purpose- but fired accidentally... (Withdrawn: Possibly classified information)
The USS Vincent (sp) shot down an Airbus over the Persian Gulf many years ago... IF it happened once, it can happen again. We even had the audacity to say the plane's passengers were dead already... (Who comes up with this BS?) Who would fly a plane load of dead-folks at a Navy ship?) Then they said the radar on teh ship told the crew that the approaching plane was an Iranian/Iraqi F-14 Tomcat. They hailed it to change course, and it didn't- so they blasted them...
I mean; if I'm on the ship and that's really what happened- then yes- shoot those SOB's down.. As we learned in WWII and as the British learned courtesy of the air-launched Exocet anti-ship missle~ an aircraft can make short work of a ship at sea- one cannot take chances... I just struggle that the radar thought an Airbus passenger plance was an F-14 (Unless the transponder was broadcasting a military/F-14 signature)
But, if you make a mistake- at least own up to it....
That's all I'm saying...
They came up with all kinds of BS around that one...
If I remember the "Expert" that was intervieed, he said something like this: "The 747 has a huge tank in it's belly, and that tank wasn't filled. Therefore, we believe a spark from somewhere ignighted the fumes and resulted in the explosion that brought the plane down... As you know, fumes are what's flammable, not the fuel itself.
My BS-Detector was going "ape-*****" as I listened to that. I mean, I know the 747 has a long range- but- with a 4-engined aircraft, that may be required to 'take a number' in a holding pattern for an hour or two before landing, if there is inclement weather on the other end; doesn't seem prudent that that plane woudl take off with a main fuel tank, empty...
Witnesses saw a streak of light come in contact with that plane before it exploded... I think a Navy ship doing a missle drill, probably targeted that plane on purpose- but fired accidentally... (Withdrawn: Possibly classified information)
The USS Vincent (sp) shot down an Airbus over the Persian Gulf many years ago... IF it happened once, it can happen again. We even had the audacity to say the plane's passengers were dead already... (Who comes up with this BS?) Who would fly a plane load of dead-folks at a Navy ship?) Then they said the radar on teh ship told the crew that the approaching plane was an Iranian/Iraqi F-14 Tomcat. They hailed it to change course, and it didn't- so they blasted them...
I mean; if I'm on the ship and that's really what happened- then yes- shoot those SOB's down.. As we learned in WWII and as the British learned courtesy of the air-launched Exocet anti-ship missle~ an aircraft can make short work of a ship at sea- one cannot take chances... I just struggle that the radar thought an Airbus passenger plance was an F-14 (Unless the transponder was broadcasting a military/F-14 signature)
But, if you make a mistake- at least own up to it....
That's all I'm saying...
Last edited by cia-agent; Aug 26, 2005 at 05:32 PM.
in this sue-happy society, I'm sure if government did admit blaim in somethign like that they'd get sued and probably peoples families would all win hundreds of millions.
FYI, two kids in my high school lost both their parents on that flight. Very sad.
FYI, two kids in my high school lost both their parents on that flight. Very sad.
Look at the frames in the shot. That frame(s) are just as the second plane hits. Notice that the fire ball (comming from the building without the black smoke) does not change in size even a little bit. I call complete BS on this one.
Clever.....but insenseative.....any how that object after the impact could have been the planes wing, Prior to impact a reflection of the plane a shadow or reflection...Thier is a lot that will be hidden from the public abought sept 11....at the time thier were rumors that US government did this on purpose, I don't beleave it but the fact that the twin towers stood as a long as they did lessoned the damage, If they had come down right on impact, damage would have been a lot more extensive...Aniversery of SEPT 11 is close at hand....


