According to Boortz news, there are some claiming the new Iranian prez was one of the hostage takers in 1980.


Haven't seen anything on the news sites about this. I wonder if the liberal press will try to bury this (it further backs up the Axis of Evil accusations)

 

Then you haven't been paying attention. They were interviewing two of the hostages on the Today show this morning and it is all over the news.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/....ap/index.html

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8410864/

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...ormer_hostages

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,161163,00.html

 

Urban Cowboy = "Go to guy" for ANY kind of news.

 

when I checked at 9am EST I couldn't find anything.

Thanks for the update.

Either way, this is importanat stuff.

 

People get tired of telling me stuff just to be told, "Yea, I know." I got a serious net addiction problem. Even when I have work to do, I'm re-visting websites over and over throughout the day. I dont know how to break the habit.

 

This isnt a good idea, but it might help keep you from "re-visting websites".

Buy a soda (anykind, that's not important). Pour some of it on your keyboard before you go to lunch.

When you get back from lunch, tilt your PC back so your floppy drive is facing up, and pour the rest of the soda in that. Careful, dont get shocked. Ignore the smoke, it's natural. Plus the smoke will prolly set off the fire alarms, and that will give you more time away from the computer while the fire fighters investigate.

Try that and let me know how it works out once you get a new PC.

 

But I Cant do my job without a computer. Anyway, I just looked up Internet addiction. I'm alright. I don't obsess about the Internet, let my personal life suffer, or feel my life would be meaningless without the Net.

 

I dont know anything about the Iranian president, but I was listening to the Conservative Talk radio, and they said that people were saying the Founding Fathers were also terrorists. These days, you get a speeding ticket and you can be considered a terrorist.

 

technically, they were.

 

Please explain how the founding fathers were "technically" terrorists.

 

Odin-
You just have your terms confused. These days you can only use the term 'terrorist' if it's an American being named. Any other nationality and you must use some PC term like 'insurgent' in order to distract from the fact that they are kidnapping and sawing off innocent people's heads, hijacking planes and crashing them into office buildings, etc.

I'm so sick of liberal PC bullchit I could just Jamswayne on somebody!

 

Just to set the record straight. First, the founding fathers were in no way, shape or form terrorist, nor could they ever be considered terrorist.

Second, a terrorist is a coward, someone with absolutely no ***** and no brains, especially the suicide bombers, never seen a better definition of a complete moron then a suicide bomber. As a coward little piece of chit terrorist have to hide in the dark and prowl around like some kind of child molester.

They seek out to gain recognition of their cause by “purposely” killing innocent women, children and men. They know their cause is a sham because very few if any actually believe in it and that is why there is no change.

So, they try to force change by “purposely” killing innocent women, children and men. They have absolutely no moral values whatsoever. They play by no rules, no code, and no international law, and thus the reason when the little wuss bag basturds are caught they do NOT nor should they ever be eligible to be treated as prisoners of war.

A terrorist with absolutely no thought of feelings would blow out the brains of a 4 year old little girl in a pretty dress just for the sport of it and then claim it as some type of example, as in “you better listen to us or else”.

It is very easy to define a terrorist compared to an insurgent. Liberals, in general, are afraid to “hurt people’s feelings” and are scared to death of terrorist. Terrorist target people like liberals for their “feelings” and “emotions” because when they start whining and calling them “insurgents” instead of wuss bag cowardly basturds it means the terrorist are moving their agenda forward, good news for them, bad news for America.

That is what terror is all about it’s about “emotions”. When you can terrify someone into changing their actions, agenda, policies etc, it’s because of emotions. The founding fathers never tried to terrify anyone nor did they seek out and “purposely” kill innocent women, children and men or seek out complete morons to blow themselves up…

And, all the terrorist I have ever seen on TV are some wimpy @ss little basturds that you could knock out with one punch. They sure in the hell aren’t no man, there not even boys, they are the lowest life form on earth and every single one of them deserves to die and its our “right” to insure we kill as many as we possibly can because the only good terrorist is a dead terrorist…

 

Odin, you always take this kind of thing as a personal attack. Take a step back and open your eyes and your mind please.

at the time, they were trying to separate from the mother country. That made them traitors. Before you get your panties in a knot, go look up the dictionary definiton.
they would be called traitors and terrorists by today's standards (guerilla fighters against imperialist occupiers)

But again, before you get upset, go look at the history of any great nation. Every great nation was founded with blood.

 

Yep technically (dict definition) they were.

However, their tactics (motivation is debatable) were driven by a much higher moral standard.

Don't get too worked up Odin, I understand your disgust if you were to apply today's inference of the word Terrorists to our founding patriots.

 

and an everyday reality that the Kings of England were nutjobs