Airbus A380 unveiled-

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 02:04 AM
  #1  
cia-agent's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Bighersh Alter-Ego
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: 33.02N / 96.66W
Airbus A380 unveiled-

Airbus has taken the title of "Largest Passenger Plane" away from Boeing's 747-400, I'm sad to announce.

Worse yet, globally, Airbus is out-selling Boeing; the once undisputed heavyweight champ.

I don't like flying, but the first chance I get to ride the A380, I'll be on it like a hornet!

 
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 02:50 AM
  #2  
F150Europe's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
From: The Netherlands
 
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 06:22 PM
  #3  
Fritzthecat's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 325
Likes: 1
From: New Orleans LA
Big *** airliner + 800 passengers + media coverage = Terrorist Woody.

Fritz
 
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 06:49 PM
  #4  
Rockpick's Avatar
Moderator &
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 31,440
Likes: 4
From: The Bluegrass State
I'm anxiously looking forward to seeing them here in Louisville (UPS's International Hub is here). UPS has 10 on order as I understand it and it should be a sight to see one of those taking off or landing.

Very impressive...

I was actually in Seattle when that was unveiled (Seattle is Boeing's home base). The news there made very little out of it and only gave it about a 5 second spot on the local news. Can't say that I don't understand that though...

RP
 
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 07:43 PM
  #5  
lees99f150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
From: Susquehanna Valley, pa.
I saw it on the news the other night and it said most US airports need to upgrade to handle the A380
 
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 09:32 PM
  #6  
Frank S's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 1998
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: Blue Ridge Mountains, GA
The name is wrong. Should be called the Airbus Valdez.
 
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2005 | 04:16 AM
  #7  
kobiashi's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 873
Likes: 1
From: Somewhere in the EU
RP - you'll be waiting quite a while.

The A380F (Freighter version) won't be out till 2008, and UPS was the most recent order . . . thre's a number of A380Fs before them (FedEx mostly)
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jan 23, 2005 | 09:36 AM
  #8  
Dave02's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Cape Coral, FL
Originally posted by Fritzthecat
Big *** airliner + 800 passengers + media coverage = Terrorist Woody.

Fritz


NO KIDDING! You can't miss that slow huge target with a rocket launcher.
 
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2005 | 09:49 AM
  #9  
Justis01's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
I would'nt put my hindparts in that. It'll probably fall apart like a Renault Fuego Hooptiemobile

Scott
 
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2005 | 02:41 PM
  #10  
cia-agent's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Bighersh Alter-Ego
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: 33.02N / 96.66W
Well, I've ridden across the Atlantic and Pacific onboard 747's, L-1011's, DC-10's and MD-11's and I got to tell you- those big birds don't get buffeted by the wind like the little birds do.

I'd never slept through a "take-off" before, but while flying to Frankfurt out of Atlanta/Hartsfield- we were like # 26 to take off, and while waiting, I fell asleep. Kudos to the pilots and the manufacturer of the Delta tri-Jet L-1011 because I didn't feel a thing; not the acceleration, not the ascent, not the banking- nothing... Then again, I was in seat 3 of 5 in the mid section of the plane the plane had three seats on each side and 5 in the middle.

Believe it or not, the big birds cruise at faster speeds than the 737's and A320's of the world. Aside from the Concorde, the 747 is the fastest passenger jet. (For now)

----------------------------
----------------------------
----------------------------

I think the fact that the A380 will be a huge target for terrorists is the same reason why all passengers will probably be subjected to full oral and body-cavity searches before boarding. It might feel funny while it's happening, but to know I'm safe (from terrorists) on the plane- would be worth it.

Now we have to worry about those "suspected terrorists" pilots that are allegedly and possibly already flying for our airlines, legally....

I got to tell you, on my flight from San Francisco to Atlanta this year, we took off from SFO heading to DFW when the pilot did some strange s&!t. The plane thundered down the run way as they normally do. Upon getting off the ground and to a decent altitude he throttled back (Like they normally do), but instead of cutting back to 90% and continuing to climb, he must've throttled back to 50%. We were in a CRJ-700 (The smallest jet I've ever flown on). Afterwards, he did some crap they don't normally do; the plane leveled off, at a low altitude. We couldn't have been more than 3,000 - 5,000 feet up. We flew around the San Francisco bay, making slow turns and the engines were darn near silent. He made a few banking turns, increasing and decreasing power, then decreased power again- almost like we were coasting. Now I'm thinking (WTFIGO?)

I'm thinking (Is this sum-b!7ch going to fly us into the Transamerica bldg? The Golden Gate? Why are we so phocking low? Are we going back to the airport?) You could see the concern on everyone's face, but no one said anything. This went on for 2-3 minutes. Out of no where, and for no apparent (delayable) reason the engines roared back to take off power, the nose pointed skyward, and we began to climb, and climb, and climb to 41,000 feet; a tie for the highest I've ever (knowingly) flown. Soon, the bay looked like a drop of water on the floor, and we were on our way. I for one, could not wait to get to DFW, and hopefully, onto a real jet.

I still don't know what the heck that was all about. In all my years of flying, I've never experienced such an indecisive, and drawn out area departure.
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2005 | 12:24 PM
  #11  
cia-agent's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Bighersh Alter-Ego
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: 33.02N / 96.66W
Ever.
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2005 | 12:28 PM
  #12  
ferroequine's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: Alberta, Canada
Originally posted by cia-agent
Believe it or not, the big birds cruise at faster speeds than the 737's and A320's of the world. Aside from the Concorde, the 747 is the fastest passenger jet. (For now)
Hmm, I was on a Delta Connection Regional Jet (50 pass., made by Bombardier), and the literature in the plane said it was faster that the widebodies (including the 747). Felt powerful too.

So how big is this thing (A-380) compared to an Antonov cargo jet?
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2005 | 01:46 PM
  #13  
Rockpick's Avatar
Moderator &
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 31,440
Likes: 4
From: The Bluegrass State
Originally posted by kobiashi
RP - you'll be waiting quite a while.

The A380F (Freighter version) won't be out till 2008, and UPS was the most recent order . . . thre's a number of A380Fs before them (FedEx mostly)
Yeah, I know. Bummer.
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2005 | 02:56 PM
  #14  
LBC150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 748
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach
Originally posted by cia-agent


I got to tell you, on my flight from San Francisco to Atlanta this year, we took off from SFO heading to DFW when the pilot did some strange s&!t. The plane thundered down the run way as they normally do. Upon getting off the ground and to a decent altitude he throttled back (Like they normally do), but instead of cutting back to 90% and continuing to climb, he must've throttled back to 50%. We were in a CRJ-700 (The smallest jet I've ever flown on). Afterwards, he did some crap they don't normally do; the plane leveled off, at a low altitude. We couldn't have been more than 3,000 - 5,000 feet up. We flew around the San Francisco bay, making slow turns and the engines were darn near silent. He made a few banking turns, increasing and decreasing power, then decreased power again- almost like we were coasting. Now I'm thinking (WTFIGO?)

I'm thinking (Is this sum-b!7ch going to fly us into the Transamerica bldg? The Golden Gate? Why are we so phocking low? Are we going back to the airport?) You could see the concern on everyone's face, but no one said anything. This went on for 2-3 minutes. Out of no where, and for no apparent (delayable) reason the engines roared back to take off power, the nose pointed skyward, and we began to climb, and climb, and climb to 41,000 feet; a tie for the highest I've ever (knowingly) flown. Soon, the bay looked like a drop of water on the floor, and we were on our way. I for one, could not wait to get to DFW, and hopefully, onto a real jet.

I still don't know what the heck that was all about. In all my years of flying, I've never experienced such an indecisive, and drawn out area departure.
i have never taken a flight out of san fran. butwhat you are describing sounds like what i have experianced at orange county airport. its because of noise and the homes below... they do exactly how you described. it is probably the same situation up there.
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2005 | 03:16 PM
  #15  
tluebbe's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: New Port Richey, FL
CIA -

This usually happens when there is other traffic to worry about. In that area, the have the traffic for Oakland too. Very, very busy airspace. Sometimes they have to level off to not cross the path of another decending aircraft.
 

Last edited by tluebbe; Jan 24, 2005 at 03:37 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:16 PM.