Looking at how successful the T or A link has been, I figured, what the heck. If you got some pics of some hot jeans, post 'em up.





(Removed link to an incredibly hot butt; dzervit saw it though; that's all that counts

 

Heads up! the beanster got banned for so-called nudity. You may want to slap a warning on that last link or lose it all together.

It is pretty hot, though...

 

Good point....

Damn shame though.
Since nothing but some cheeks were shown, I thought it was OK.
Nothing you can't see on prime-time TV. (NYPD Blue)

 

I'm pretty sure I saw the clam, thus my post... pretty nice piece or **** though... and beanie's post didn't have bush either, but that much exposed skin qualifies you for a whippin...

 

There was a clam shadow; but no clear shot of it.

I tell you, I saw that on another site- I'd like to see what the rest may have looked like.

 

I'd say VERY NICE !!!!

 

there is no nudity. just camel toes and moose knuckles, all jeans covered. everyone is getting way to poltically correct.

 

It's not getting to politically correct, it's steve's site and he says no nudity or anything depicting nudity. You want to see nudity go to a porno forum, not here.

Sorry for this rant, but I view this site on my company laptop and we cannot view porno on it. There have been a few times where pictures on this site have come close to that.

 

http://www.homestead.com/deidrababe/files/MVC_018F.JPG

 

I think I know her and her sister.

I don't care what you think they are still twins, and chubby girls need love too.

 

^^^^Fat women need love too.....just not from me....yuck.


as far as not viewing ****, you can use your judgement most anytime you wander into a link as to what it might contain. For instance the thread about T&A, when the pics start flying its a good bet they are gonna be provacative, so just dont click em. Same with this one, pics on tight jeans...hmm....your probably gonna see a chicks butt in a pic, dont click it just to be safe. No need to limit everyones viewing cuz a few people arent more careful at their jobsite. A little more common sense in this world wouldnt be such a bad thing.

 

and therein lies the problem.
If your are viewing a thread with a questionable subject and a post in the thread has a link and you still click it, then crying foul is a little over the top however,....

....if you open a thread and a picture jumps out on your screen that may be offensive then, the line has been crossed.

Women, kids, preachers, etc... view the boards.

Anyone should be able to read any thread on the board without fear of what they may find. The thread title should not serve as a 'final warning'.

I read a thread regardless of the title even in the Lightning Forum.
and we all know most of them can't spell.

 

i agree embedded stuff does pose a problem in some threads but when the title suggests there might be images not suitable then perhaps its best to stay outta that thread. The chances of you finding a nugget of truth inside of a T&A thread are pretty slim. What ya are gonna find are pics of hot women with lovely tatas and a firm backside. The title isnt a final warning, in most cases its a description of whats happening in the thread and if its something you might be offended by dont wander in. Course there is the random harmless thread where someone posts a pic of themselves and its from a gayporn website or it involves pierced nipples but those are few and far between.

 

I read a thread regardless of the title even in the Lightning Forum.
and we all know most of them can't spell.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go play with your GOTES