I feel so bad for you Kerry supporters out there, I really do. It must be so hard to have the courage to stand up and back a guy that continues to move all over the map.

You have known or should know by now what the F in John F. Kerry stands for. It stands for John Flip-flop Kerry.

”I voted for the $87 billion before I voted against it…”

Now, your boy has taking Dean’s stand on the war on terror ”This is the wrong war, at the wrong time, for the wrong reason…” Now, recall when Dean was spewing this crap your boy Kerry was all over him, saying Dean was weak and had no leadership skills (hello pot, kettle here).

Now, after just stating he supported this war last month and stated he would have done the very same thing President Bush did by going to war in Iraq but maybe do a few things different he has flip-flopped and is now, once again, against it and not just against it but stating what Dean had stated when Kerry was all over him for the same statement Kerry is making now…

Man my head is spinning…

”I agreed with President Bush and would have done the same thing and gone to war with Iraq, before I believed this is the wrong war, at the wrong time, for the wrong reason…”

You Kerry supporters must really be popping some aspirin for your daily headaches. I imagine you all have a website you check every morning to see where you stand on all the different positions, I mean to support Kerry you have to flip and flop like he does, correct?

I don’t know but I can’t understand why anyone would support a person that doesn’t see any thing wrong with the slaughter of children. A lot of children were slaughtered in Russia just a few days ago and this was done by “Muslim” extremist, not Russians, but MUSLIM EXTREMIST, Al-kada (sp?) you know the same people that did 911, the same people that Saddam let use his country for training…

Yep, these same people we are fighting in Iraq killed hundreds of innocent children, shot many in the back as they were running away but all Kerry can spew from his mouth is how protecting ourselves, our children, our way of life is wrong, the wrong war, at the wrong time, for the wrong reasons…

All Kerry is concerned about is how much money can he suck up from working people to give to the lazy and useless in this country and doesn’t have an ounce of concern about innocent children being slaughtered by terrorist.

Yep, your boy has his priorities straight.


”Kerry, the wrong man, for the wrong job, at the wrong time…”

 

Blah blah blah, more spin. He says he did support it, but looking back it was a mistake. You can soin it any way you want, but that's what he said. Oh yeah, and Bush never flips, blah blah blah.

"I don’t know but I can’t understand why anyone would support a person that doesn’t see any thing wrong with the slaughter of children." Where did he say that? Oh yeah, just words you put in his mouth, again.

The thing in Russia was Al-Queda? Do you have info we don't? Of course you think we were fighting Al-Queda in Iraq! Of course, let's not forget who trained and armed Al-Queda in the first place.

When is your boy going to get the guy that actually did attack us? Oh yeah, he's not important now. And you swallow all of this!

 

Yo...actually, John is more than a flip flop, he is a double talker....changes his mind almost in the same day on any issue. He even changes his advisors...

Did you see the article over at drudge where Kerry is waving a semi-auto shotgun - the same kind he tried to ban. Now that is pretty hilarious. The guy is the biggest hippocrite ever...and he doesn't even try to hide it.

Then I heard Edwards whining about what Cheney had said that there would be terror attacks under Kerry. I agree with this because he is going to sit around until an attack occurs before he does anything, so an attack is inevitable. Bush believes in pre-emptive strikes, which, by the way. Putin declared the same thing. You can't sit around waiting for an nuke to be rammed up your butt. KILL ALL TERRORISTS...



runnert

 

there were actually checnyan rebels and islamic militants at that school were the kids got slaughtered, both of which are funded by Al Queda. These people are the scum of the earth and need to be dealt with. it is a shame that the slaughter of kids gets other countries to realize what these thugs are about and what needs to be done to deal with them. now if we could just get democrats to see that......clinton was in office 8 years and didn't do anything except send some cruise missiles. kerry won't be any different. I am so confused by what Kerrys stance on everything is. I am glad we got a pres who has the sac to stand up to these guys, we got to protect ourselves from these thugs at any cost. we cannot afford to quit the war on terror, EVER. the time is always right to stop terrorist and people who support them. we cannot let them get away with 9/11, the madrid bombings, and all that has happened in russia this month. it was only three years ago that 9/11 happened, have you guys forgotten?

Kerry/Edwards: So Much Sh*t We Nedded Two Johns!

 

Thing is, does it matter that it was Al-Queda or not. It was Musslem extremist, wether they are Al-Queda or not does not matter. The fight against terrorist has shifted from Al-Queda to the entire musslem extremist cult.
Al-Queda does not have the power it once had and you can thank W. for that. The 9-11 commision also found that Osama was not Al-Quedas major sourse of funding, rather they had become a self saficiant group and Osama most likely does not have the influence he once had. Its hard to direct from a cave.
So is it imparitive that we get Osama? Sure, we need to get the bastard for the attacks he helped plan, but getting him will do little to stop these Musslem extremist attacks that have been happening from Sudan to Russia to the twin towers.
As for Kerry, his approach will be lets see where and what they do next and we will go after them then.
Hopefully with Russia's new quest to fight these groups anywhere, we will have another allie to hunt and exterminate these groups before they can plan anymore of these sensless attacks.

Sled..

If Kerry is the answer than it must have been a pointless question.

 

sorry, i just needed an excuse to post this...

 

"Quick Johnny..To the Flop Cave. We'll take the Flopmobile and go out and save this country."

 

I know you are all sick of hearing this but its time for another one of my “Why John Kerry isn’t fit to run a scout troop, let alone the country” rants…

At least you know what to expect from Bush and he will take a stand. That stand may not always be right but at least he will have a position. Kerry is a master politician and he is trying his damndest to try and appeal to everyone without committing to anything or making his stand on anything clear. He thinks he can win the election by being vague and continually shifting a tenuous position when the political tide changes just a little bit. All he wants to do is to ride the wave of ignorant "anyone but Bush" hate propaganda into office without telling anyone why he is the right man for the job. Maybe he can ride that wave all the way and stay safe politically without taking any stands but I hope it bites him in the a$$! With the war on terror such a major issue in this campaign he has to have a firm position. I didn't agree with Howard Dean but I respected the fact that he had his beliefs and he stuck to them. Kerry has done noting but ***** off of Dean's stance when it is convenient and trash Dean for it when he had to. Here is an idea for John Kerry, stop beating your chest about the war 30 years ago and take a firm stand on the one we are fighting today. Until he shows he has the intestinal fortitude to stick to something (rather than doing an about face when it becomes politically inconvenient) I say better the devil I know than the devil I don't! I can respect a man that sticks to his guns even if it may ruin him politically but I can't respect a guy who puts his won't jeopardize his own political career for what he thinks should be done. Flat out, Bush may not be a very good president but Kerry does not have what it takes to lead this country right now and he proves that every day. One last thing, bush has flipped his positions, on some issues but at least it is after it becomes clear that he has to do it, not at the slightest change of the political wind.

 

the other day on a radio talk show, the host played a tape of John Kerry a few months ago saying "........I would pull all of our troops out of Korea......." then last week he said "It is critical to maintain our military force in Korea"

I could not believe it, he is not a very convincing liar.

I was unsure myself about this election, but now I am sure. Bush may not be the absolute best but Kerry is a wishy-washy fruitcake. We may as well have the one with some gonads to do what he says he'll do.

I've also heard that Kerry's nomination was staged to fail so that Billary can run in 08. That seems to make the most sense now. You just about have to be a moron to vote for Kerry even if you hate Bush.

 

"You just about have to be a moron to vote for Kerry even if you hate Bush."

So anyone that disagree's with you MUST be a moron (or just about)? Wow, you're a true rightie, total intolerance. I think people supporting Bush must have a screw loose, but I'll respect your opinion and your right to have it. This is a democracy here in America. You have a right to your opinion without any sort of persecution. Obviously, righties would prefer a totalitarian society where only their opinions are acceptable. What a pathetic bunch of losers. How sad that you would ridicule someone because they disagree with you.

 

In all fairness this runs rampant at both ends of the political spectrum, we just see more righties in here. If you support Bush there are people out there that call you a **** and would like to see you get stoned to death. Most of us in here are actually pretty moderate buh trust me there is a good amount of hate and intolerance coming from the far left too, they may preach tolerance but they would love it if everyone had to think their way too.

 

You're right fatman, it's wrong either way!

 

If you ask me their both- GW and Kerry- crooked as a country mile and Cheney, don't get me started. I don't know who the he!! I'm going to vote for. Now when Jesse V. was in charge of MN at least it was always interesting, you couldn't wait to pick up a paper every day to see what he had done. Write in JESSE!

 

momalle1,

Actually now that I re-read my post it is rather offensive. I guess I should say "you just about have to be deaf to vote for Kerry, even if you hate Bush"

But before you get your feathers too ruffled, hear this. Most of my posts in the political thread have referred to "terd beauty contests" I mean come on, they both suck if you ask me.

I think that there is no right answer for many of todays issues. To be honest with you, the only preference over Kerry I have is that Bush will not let up on the terrorists. I am afraid that the minute we let our guard down, as Clinton did, is when we get it good.

If I were pres. I would do the same thing.

IF I did not hear Kerry flip flop so much with my own ears, he'd get my vote, just for a change. But Kerry ain't the answer.

Actually, I prefer Joe Lieberman and John McCaine over these two clowns.

WE NEED A LEGIT THIRD PARTY. But that will never happen.


I would vote Republocrat or Demolican if we had the choice.

 

I respectfully disagree with that statement. I do understand the statement and I think it is valid in today’s environment. But here is why I disagree with it.

If all the people who truly do not support Bush or Kerry actually went out and voted for a third party candidate it would make a huge difference. Granted the third party candidate wouldn’t win this time but answer me this, how much of the vote would that third candidate actually get?

I will say I honestly feel it would be well over single digits. I am willing to bet that you just might see somewhere around 15% - 18%.

True not much however an eye opener and a wave starter. I have the utmost respect for everyone here regardless of who you actually support and for what ever reason. I am telling you though that if those who truly do not like either candidate stayed true to their word and actually went out and voted for a third party candidate that in 10 – 15 years, maybe 20 but I don’t think that long, but you would have a decent 3 way race for President…

No, I am not saying this in order to take votes away from Kerry because truth be told if all the people who rather have someone other then Bush or Kerry voted for another person I believe it would take an equal number of votes from Bush as well…

You have to start somewhere and nothing is done overnight or in the first few rounds. It is something to think about…