View Poll Results: Do you smoke?
Yes.



42
23.60%
No.



115
64.61%
Sometimes.



15
8.43%
Doesn't matter to me.



6
3.37%
Voters: 178. You may not vote on this poll
Smoking!
Originally Posted by J-150
wow! that must have been tough. was he very cranky?
__________________
Jim
Jim
Originally Posted by bluejay432000
Actually, no. He had always maintained that he could do it. We kept telling him he couldn't quit. One day, he and some co-workers all quit. he was the only one that stuck with it. After a short time of not smoking, I remember him saying that he had never know what food really tasted like. He could not believe how much smoking killed the taste.
even after all of the smoking, he was still able to quit. Thats the important thing. Good for him. Its not an easy thing to do.
It's interesting that you would write:
because you seem to be creating pro and con arguments in your own head and putting words into people's mouths (so to speak as this is all written) to have your own debate.
Never once did I claim second hand smoke is as "fatal/harmful" as direct smoke. I said it was harmful but never did I discuss degrees of toxicity/harmfulness/ whatever you want to term it.
I also never called YOU stupid. You seem to take these things personally.
However, you are inconsistent.
In post 117 you wrote:
Then in post 146 you write:
which implies second-hand smoke is fatal, and you wrote:
which places second hand smoke in the "ambient toxin" category, and:
So it can kill, according to you, it's just not as fatal.
You slam us with an all CAPS statement that includes 6 exclamation points, wanting to make it clear to us that "SECOND HAND SMOKE IS HARMLESS", and then you say it's fatal, but not as fatal.
Is that anything like in the Princess Bride where the guy is only "mostly dead"?
People are not refusing to consider your opinion because you don't have a consistent one yet.
Make up your mind and then we'll debate.
Originally Posted by J-150
I guess there are some subjects that people refuse to consider any other opinion.
Never once did I claim second hand smoke is as "fatal/harmful" as direct smoke. I said it was harmful but never did I discuss degrees of toxicity/harmfulness/ whatever you want to term it.
I also never called YOU stupid. You seem to take these things personally.
However, you are inconsistent.
In post 117 you wrote:
Originally Posted by J-150
let's get this straight.
SECOND HAND SMOKE IS HARMLESS!!!!!!
SECOND HAND SMOKE IS HARMLESS!!!!!!
Originally Posted by J-150
I counter your arguments with "you'd have to be stupid to think that second hand smoke is anywhere near as fatal/harmful as direct smoke.
Originally Posted by J-150
The human body has capacity to deal with and filter out a certain amount of ambient toxins. Things like second hand cigarette smoke, car exhaust, household furnace exhaust, plastic gases, etc.
Originally Posted by J-150
Im not saying that it cant kill... Im saying under normal circumstances, second hand smoke isn't as fatal as the lobby would lead us to believe.
You slam us with an all CAPS statement that includes 6 exclamation points, wanting to make it clear to us that "SECOND HAND SMOKE IS HARMLESS", and then you say it's fatal, but not as fatal.
Is that anything like in the Princess Bride where the guy is only "mostly dead"?
People are not refusing to consider your opinion because you don't have a consistent one yet.
Make up your mind and then we'll debate.
can't stand the smell of cigarette or cigar smoke. My Dad smoked from the time he was 13 till he was 35. At the age of 35, he was smoking 3 packs a day and quit cold turkey. His nasty habit influenced me not to even want to try it. My wife is allergic to the smoke and goes in to coughing convulsions, so we avoid it totally.
okay Kobi...
you claim I am all over the map... but each of those is a repsonse to a separate question. Each is basically a half-thought.
Lets put them all together, apparently you can't.
Ambient second hand smoke is harmless as the body can filter it out. This is due to the low concentration of toxins present in second hand smoke and how much of it actually enters your body. The anti-smoking lobby implies that second hand smoke is as fatal as direct smoke. It is not.
If you were to breathe second hand smoke exclusively through scuba gear, as you suggested Kobi, then of course it can be fatal.
you claim I am all over the map... but each of those is a repsonse to a separate question. Each is basically a half-thought.
Lets put them all together, apparently you can't.
Ambient second hand smoke is harmless as the body can filter it out. This is due to the low concentration of toxins present in second hand smoke and how much of it actually enters your body. The anti-smoking lobby implies that second hand smoke is as fatal as direct smoke. It is not.
If you were to breathe second hand smoke exclusively through scuba gear, as you suggested Kobi, then of course it can be fatal.
I started smoking @ 18 years old. I've always been a 1/2 pack/day guy. In 1993 I quit and used the savings foa a downpayment to buy a new Harley-Davidson. Then I went to Cuba, bought some cigars and hae been back to 1/2 pack/day since 2002. I'm trying again, but it's defintely more difficult this time. For the last 6 months, I've only smoked OP's (other peoples') at the rate of about 3 or so a week. Does that count as quiting?
I don't like the smell of cigarettes, but I thoroughly enjoy smoking a class cigar more than anything.
BTW, I do buy a pack once in a while to repay those I have 'borrowed'. I don't buy a pack for myself because I know I would smoke it up in 2 days.
I don't like the smell of cigarettes, but I thoroughly enjoy smoking a class cigar more than anything.
BTW, I do buy a pack once in a while to repay those I have 'borrowed'. I don't buy a pack for myself because I know I would smoke it up in 2 days.



.