MikeF150 - I'd be PROUD to be called a redneck! At least a redneck doesn't back down when confronted & doesn't evade questions. As for the term "doves" - it's' what THEY call themselves! I see no problem in using a term they coined for their position! Doves represent peace!
I have spent time in other Forums. I'll be posting some of what I read there & when I do I dare you to say that our action is "evil". See, I do back my comments up!

 

 

My friend, it is hard to quote you on anything, now you don't delete it, you just go back and completely change everything with EDIT...

Anyway, we are not that TUPID...

 

01XLT Sport....

I DID NOT REFUSE TO ANSWER ANYTHING !!!

WHY DON'T YOU READ ACCURATELY......?

I said that there were other leaders who were more vile than SH.
I DID NOT SAY THEY WERE A THREAT...to anyone other than their own people.

I am agreeing with you !!!

Taking all things into consideration SH is the one we should currently go for, simple because he poses a wider world threat.

 

 

ok, i am lost, please explain it. this not a slam or a trick, i really dont see it.

I personnally might not agree with what someone did 100, 200 years ago, but I refuse to take blaim for it now.

I rescently lost a close Family member to a brutal - torchure-murder-robbery, she was killed by a hispanic man. I hold no grudge against any Hispanics, just one.

please Mike with all your worldly wisdom, answer my question, Every race, person, what ever has lost somthing and has been done wrong ( name me one race that hasent) so tell me what the Indians have to do with the current situation?

 

lenticular, read my question

its a 3 part question. let me explain the first part ask you to name the top 5 of the people you are talking about.

"I keep hearing this over and over again. give me a top 5 list of the worst powers and leaders in the world."?

the second question is:

"the way i see it if he is in the top 5 five does it matter what the order is that the US takes them down?"

thrid question is:

More important give me a top 5 of the ones who pose a serious threat to the US. (North Korea is a given.)?

you dont have to answer i was just you to elaborate on your views.

 

BROTHERDAVE - please accept my sincerest sympathy & condolences in your loss. What a tragic thing to have to endure.
If you don't mind, let me know the name of this loved one - I'll write her name in the parish book of Prayer Intentions so the whole Church can pray for her. I'll also remember her when I go to Eucharistic Adoration.
God Bless - I hope you find the peace & solace you need right now. Please know I am praying for you too. Feel free to email me if you need to talk - I'm always here for a friend.

 

I wasn't going to get in on this one. But remember when you said this?

You have now had 4 more posts since then. It sounds to me that either you are just trying to pick a fight or that this is all just one big joke. The devil smiley makes me believe you are doing this just to have a laugh. If that is the case you must be the only one laughing, because I sure am not.

Like other threads recently, this has went from a very good discussion to nothing but personal attacks. I just makes me mad when someone disagrees with another person and will not even listen what the other person has to say. Not just here on the Internet, but in real life.

I have said all I want to say

 

“The trouble is that there are other powers and leaders in the world who are even more vile than SH. The question is which of them is an actual threat to the rest of the world.... I don't think most ordinary folk will ever know.....not until the 50 year limit on State secrets is up and we find out what at the moment can only be known to a privileged few....those in the highest positions of power.”

As far as reading accurately, that is where I read it in your post. You are not accurate as far as your comment ” I DID NOT SAY THEY WERE A THREAT...to anyone other than their own people”

You actually state “The question is which of them is an actual threat to the rest of the world....

That is where I got the perception that you meant that there “may” be other leaders more of a threat then Saddam. I apologize for any misunderstanding, but you would have to admit that in your post you are not clearly accurate at stating the point and when another asked you to give a top 5 list you did not do so thus I had stated you still had not answered the question.

So I read your initial post as accurately as one could since it was not a very clear interpretation of your view.

In any regards you still have not given any top 5 list of other leaders that are more vile then Saddam along with some examples. Referring someone to a publication is not stating your view and why you believe your view to be correct. In court, if I am correct, and I very well may not be, but a lawyer can not simple tell a judge to refer to a specific law and then call it a day. The lawyer must explain his/her position and why he/she believes a particular law applies in that situation. Would that be correct?

 

The only problem I pose my friend is with you. You just seem to be unable to debate with me in an adult manner. You are well beyond any liberal I have ever met. You are incoherent in most of your post, you either delete them entirely or you go back at a later time after someone has addressed it then edit it to change it’s basic meaning.

Therefore, you make it impossible to debate or have any adult communications with you, since you have no clue why you have any particular views you may have.

In other words your views change on an hourly and daily basis, due to being incoherent, deleting post, and editing post.

I see nothing wrong with editing post for spelling, or to add additional comments. That is usually done like this:

EDIT: spelling errors

Or

EDIT: I would also add that I agree with 01…

You seem to practice deception. I will give you a simple example:

Your original post will be something like:

“I like green F150’s”

Then if someone calls you on it, or don’t agree with you, or you just change your mind you will later come back and edit it like this:

“I like Red F150’s”
edited --------

You furthermore give less weight to your creditability with statements like:

“This will be my last post”

Yet continue on….

Guess that is all a part of being incoherent…

 

Good God....!

Is this all you people have to do with your lives !

To be pedantic and pick up on a totally trivial comment almost thrown away as an aside to the main point.

I wish I'd never mentioned other leaders and nations !

I have not responded to that, or listed any such examples...they are quite readily available from any search engine.
It was not the main thrust of my post which was to agree with the fight against SH as the person who was the actual greatest threat to the modern world.

If you had picked up on my comments about the world's perception of the US, or several other points I might have understood, but to pursue this point like a dog with a bone....I'm going to retire back to my usual forum and leave you people to your own devices !

 

That is truly sad, you can not answer the question like an adult, and you whine and then run off to some other forum for sympathy.

It is people like you that hold back solving problems in our community and society. The reason is when confronted with questions on “your” views and “your” statements rather then give some kind of foundation for your reasoning you stomp your feet, run and hide, then put down those with opposite views that can “actually” GIVE there reasons for why they have the views they have.

 

Good God....!

Is this all you people have to do with your lives !

To be pedantic and pick up on a totally trivial comment almost thrown away as an aside to the main point.

I wish I'd never mentioned other leaders and nations !

I have not responded to that, or listed any such examples...they are quite readily available from any search engine.
It was not the main thrust of my post which was to agree with the fight against SH as the person who was the actual greatest threat to the modern world.

If you had picked up on my comments about the world's perception of the US, or several other points I might have understood, but to pursue this point like a dog with a bone....I'm going to retire back to my usual forum and leave you people to your own devices !



You do realise you typed probably over a 100 words to explain why you dont want to type 5 countries names. Now thats some logic i want to listen to.
what shoould I type and in which search engine to find the names you are talking about.

would it be:

5 current worst leader
five worst leaders
5 worst countries
five worst countries
lenticulars opion on the 5 worst leaders
david lettermans top 10 countries bad to live in

thanks cowlady, I truley hope its a place none of you have to go even the people here i dont see eye to eye with.

 

Hey '01 ,
I get a good laugh from your debates and most of the lame jack@sses that can't pull their heads out of whatever orfice it's stuck in.

To answer your religion part question... Can you say Mormon ???? Based on Jesus residing in North America.

Go Troops !!! Keep your heads down and your powder dry. Come home Victors of a just cause.