Can you believe this jerk and what he said in the below news site:


http://www.nydailynews.com/news/stor...0p-62477c.html

What does he mean when he says that we need to act like the kind of nation when we are not number 1. He needs to go crawl under a rock and stay there - I could only wish the rock would grind him to dust

runnert

 

Be it as it may if what he is saying is not the truth. During the 8 years of his presidency, the opposing party never hesitated to take its shots at his administration in both a personal and political fashion. The system has become far too partisan, IMHU.

 

Runnert,

The article says he said :

"We need to be creating a world that we would like to live in when we're not the biggest power on the block."

I don't agree with Clinton on hardly anything , but i DO agree with that statement.

What's wrong with it??

 

WhiskeyTango

I guess you could look at this statement from two (or more) different angles. I am looking at it from the other one. IMO, Clintion is saying we need to become a nation that is more liberal (because he is liberal) - appeasing to world opinion - because the polls show that no one likes us. If you go by media opinion, the world hates us and we need to change ourselves so that when we are the "little" guy, we are traveling with the environmental and leberal whacko flow. I think the media is wrong and more of the world supports our stances on just about everything. So I totally disagree with Clinton. We need to be creating a nation that goes in the right direction for us, not for the whackos of the world.

runnert

 

Well that statement sounds like since we have power we should not use it because we can so others won't follow our lead.


But what I take it as, remove those who want us dead so that if we are not the big guns anymore thats one less thing to worry about.

 

OK,
I didn't read it like that, though based on his record that could well be how he meant it.

I took it to mean we create a planet with liberty and justice for all, where nuclear defenses and bio weapons are not necessary cause all of the trouble makers have been chained up for good........or vaporized.

WT.

 

I don't disagree with you at all that we need to kill our enemies. Vaporize them all. The problem with Clinton is that he empowered our enemies - i.e N. Korea.

runnert

 

No doubt,

That's frequently the case. Where did Saddam get botulinum, and other pathogens possibly if not likely the anthrax they've used?? Most likely from us.

Here's the letter to the senate stating what we gave to them.

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/arti.../210336.shtxml

 

The reason we need to be the biggest power is simple. We promote peace. Let China or Bin Ladin rule the world, i dont see it how things could get worse cause they do the opposite

 

And this from a guy that does not know the meaning of is ... go figure???

 

From reading his statement, seems to me that he would be happy seeing America less than #1. Typical liberal socialist attitude.

 

The biggest problem with Clinton and Clintonites is this:

The are liberal socialist. This means they believe everything “should” have an equal playing field. Liberal socialist like Clinton believe those that can not succeed should be supported by those that do succeed, hence redistribution of wealth, putting down and penalizing the strong and those with “self” determination to succeed.

To liberal socialist success is bad, and failure is good. They are proving themselves each and every day. Dumbing down of our schools. It is not good that little Billy is getting mostly A’s when little Johnny is so stupid he can’t read. So to make little Johnny feel better about himself we give stupid little Johnny a C (though he deserves an F, or M for Moron).

To further keep little Billy “back” and equal with stupid little Johnny there is no advanced classes for little Billy to further succeed. However, there are classes for stupid little Johnny to “try” and catch up with little Billy.

Welfare, take money from those that succeed, middle class and upper middle class and give it to the lazy. Furthermore, to make the lazy bastards receiving welfare feel better about themselves, enable them to buy new cars as well we shall further penalize the middle class and upper middle class and take more of their hard earn money in taxes and give it to the lazy bastards sitting at home on their @ss watching Oprah (telling them they are normal) and give them a “tax refund” for which they have paid absolutely NO taxes to begin with so they do NOT deserve any tax refund.

This is liberal socialism. X-president Clinton’s statement is a further example of how he believes the world should be equal. X-president Clinton helped to advance China with their rocket program for nukes.

He and his good buddy Jimmy (can’t do a damn thing right) Carter both helped to insure that North Korea was able to get nukes for themselves. X-president Carter like X-president Clinton are both liberal socialist. They believe that ONLY the government can take care of the people because the people (US) are just too stupid to do it on our own.

X-president Clinton’s statement was a further example of how he would like to see America as an equal or weaker then the rest of the world. X-president Clinton used in his statement:

“we need to act like the kind of nation (WHEN) we are not number 1”

He uses the word WHEN not IF but WHEN. Nobody that has self determination or the will to succeed would ever use such an illogical word as WHEN in a statement.

That would be like Ford making a statement:

“We need to think about making trucks a particular way so WHEN we are over taken by Chevy.”

One in business would use a more logic statement that promotes the idea of SUCCESS, for example, Ford might state:

We MUST build are truck’s a particular way so IF Chevy TRIES to take us over they will fail.”

X-president Clinton is NOT a positive thinking individual as is any liberal socialist. X-president Clinton was a disgrace, he is a boy (not man) that goes off to another country to protest America’s use of the military during his youth, but as president he used it more then just about any president in history.

It’s no wonder Mr. ***** was not sure what the definition of is, is…

The day America becomes an equal, or worse, less powerful then any other nation is the day all free nations will fall and be but a distant thought…

 

I don't think he was saying that we should not be #1, I think he was saying that we should have learned something from the USSR, just so that if we ever do fall as a world superpower that we won't be getting our butts kicked constantly by other countries. Now, let's go to WAR, baby!

 

He had 8 years to do so.................oh ya he was busy getting a **** job.
That shows me that we are serious and HE (sadam) better be too. He's only had 12 years.
Who's taking over the #1 spot Bill?

 

Well, Billy boy was trying to help China to become number 1. Good thing Billy boy is gone, now if we could get him to SHUT UP and realize he is an X-President and no longer of ANY USE we will all be better.