Expedition / Navigator

how tuff is the IRS in these things...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 09:57 PM
  #1  
Riken's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
how tuff is the IRS in these things...

are there any problems with the rear suspension?
can they candle 600lbs of tongue weight and full passengers?
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 10:30 PM
  #2  
wandell's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 28,203
Likes: 2
From: cairo,ga
I've never heard of any problems on the 03-06's IRS.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 10:36 PM
  #3  
JSCOTT's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: Frisco, TX, USA
I've towed quite a bit and hauled even more... And my rear end was replaced at 56k... I can't say if I made it worse towing, etc. as this was a known issue. I haven't had any issues with the IRS per say, just the differential.

Towing 6500 lb travel trailer w/ WD hitch, 3500 lb boat, 4x4 trails, etc...

2004 EB 4x4 model...
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 08:31 PM
  #4  
Bighersh's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
From: North of Dallas, South of Frisco
No one I know with a 4 x 4 Expedition, has made it past 70,000 miles without needing a new rear end, or a new transmission, or both...

However, everyone I know with a 4 x 2 Expedition has not had a single problem with the truck...

4x4 seems to be a POS in the Expedition line...

Coincidence? I think not...
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 11:28 PM
  #5  
Riken's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
are these 9.75"?
is it the limited slip that's not dependable?
 
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2007 | 12:28 AM
  #6  
ferroequine's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: Alberta, Canada
Originally Posted by Bighersh
No one I know with a 4 x 4 Expedition, has made it past 70,000 miles without needing a new rear end, or a new transmission, or both...
Our 2000 XLT 4x4 /w 5.4L was still going strong at 95K. But that was the 4R100 transmission and the larger rear end (no limited slip). No IRS though, it had a solid rear axle.
 
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2007 | 08:14 AM
  #7  
JSCOTT's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: Frisco, TX, USA
Mine is the LS and 9.75" rear end. The size is the same, but the housing is different to accomidate the IRS. I was told the new parts are much more rugged than the old ones... We'll see how it goes.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:51 PM.