Exhaust & Intake Systems
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

Are K&N Air Filters Worth It? By KNF

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 31, 2012 | 10:17 AM
  #16  
SSCULLY's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,511
Likes: 10
From: Under the flightpath of old ORD 22R
Originally Posted by Takeda
Here are some comparison photos of an OEM paper filter to a K&N. Notice how much more filter media area the paper filter has:
..<remove huge pictures>....
OEM Paper media vs K&N (same magnification):
..<remove huge pictures>....
What does this prove ?

It is supposition that more media = more filtration.

Originally Posted by Takeda
A setup was built to use carbon resistors as a smoke source. The OEM paper filter media would not let the smoke through, but the smoke passed through the K&N filter media with no problem
:..<remove huge pictures>....
You proved that K&N did not design a filter to filter smoke.
- Don't use it for respirator mask media when entering a burning house.
Was there something else you were trying to show with this test ?

I only have 70K miles on the '06 with a K&N filter, the '01 is still going with the JLP washable media filter on it ( I can say works better than factory ).


Try to do that with factory filters....

I love how some will pick apart aftermarket filters, as if factory filters are the end all.
If factory is end all for you, great stick with 100% stock, nothing wrong with doing that.
Just don't try to pass off 1 test and fine print circled as proof of limitations or problems.

That is trying to use conjecture and supposition as facts.
 
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2012 | 10:41 AM
  #17  
tg150's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,557
Likes: 2
From: NJ
I dunno.. I've been using a K&N filter in my 88 mustang for over 20yrs and one in my truck sine 2006.. I've never ever had any issues whats so ever with either and will continue to use them.
 
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2012 | 10:53 AM
  #18  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 85
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Originally Posted by tg150
I dunno.. I've been using a K&N filter in my 88 mustang for over 20yrs and one in my truck sine 2006.. I've never ever had any issues whats so ever with either and will continue to use them.
Exactly. I'll rely on my real life experience over all the negative theory.
 
__________________
Jim
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2012 | 12:14 PM
  #19  
craneman's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Chicagoland
Stock

2005 103k mi
100% stock
20 mpg
looks and runs great
 
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2012 | 03:24 PM
  #20  
Scooterdog's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Grand Rapids, MI
oiled big holed filters = waste of money

Tested the "oiled reusable filter" in an actual OEM engine induction lab. We tested flow percentage over free flow (no filter), amount of dust intrusion (what got pasted the filter), filter load at 10% flow loss and time to 10% flow loss failure.

The oiled filter flowed 1.83% better then Factory paper at the start of test.
The oiled filter allowed 133% more dust intrusion then the Factory.
The oiled filter reached the 10% flow loss 6 times faster then the Factory. (Not because it picked up more dust, it had significantly less surface area).

You can buy marketing space on the side of any race vehicle, doesn't mean you product works or is worth dam.

I laugh when I see a K&N sticker on a truck (especially if it's a Chevy or a Dodge). Selling to the stupid works every time.

I run a factory paper in my F150, 265,000 miles and still going strong.
 
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2012 | 05:53 PM
  #21  
SSCULLY's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,511
Likes: 10
From: Under the flightpath of old ORD 22R
Originally Posted by Scooterdog
Tested the "oiled reusable filter" in an actual OEM engine induction lab. We tested flow percentage over free flow (no filter), amount of dust intrusion (what got pasted the filter), filter load at 10% flow loss and time to 10% flow loss failure.

The oiled filter flowed 1.83% better then Factory paper at the start of test.
The oiled filter allowed 133% more dust intrusion then the Factory.
The oiled filter reached the 10% flow loss 6 times faster then the Factory. (Not because it picked up more dust, it had significantly less surface area).

You can buy marketing space on the side of any race vehicle, doesn't mean you product works or is worth dam.

I laugh when I see a K&N sticker on a truck (especially if it's a Chevy or a Dodge). Selling to the stupid works every time.

I run a factory paper in my F150, 265,000 miles and still going strong.
Got a URL to these test results ?
They are contradictory to the tests published to date.
 
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2012 | 08:23 PM
  #22  
Scooterdog's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Sorry

Sorry SScully,

These test were done by a major Design and Build company who does Air Induction systems for most of the major car companies around the world. They don't normally post any results on the Web as the car companies pay them for the design work and testing they do exclusively for them. Don't forget: their are Lies, Dam Lies and Lab Results. I putting my two cents on your sales pitch.
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2012 | 12:26 AM
  #23  
SSCULLY's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,511
Likes: 10
From: Under the flightpath of old ORD 22R
Originally Posted by Scooterdog
Sorry SScully,

These test were done by a major Design and Build company who does Air Induction systems for most of the major car companies around the world. They don't normally post any results on the Web as the car companies pay them for the design work and testing they do exclusively for them. Don't forget: their are Lies, Dam Lies and Lab Results. I putting my two cents on your sales pitch.
In other words, we are to take your word for it.

Sounds like taking an opinion as fact in my book.

Sure I'll believe that real soon. You are right, there are lies, damn lies and lab results. Lab results that cannot be posted are damn lies, until proven other wise.

Let me post my double secret probation results in the next post

Conjecture and BS presented as fact is just that conjecture and BS
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2012 | 12:49 AM
  #24  
aussiekeeper's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 991
Likes: 1
From: Sierra Vista, Az.
Scully, you live in Des Plaines or Mt. Prospect?
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2012 | 07:39 AM
  #25  
Takeda's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
From: Durham, NC
Originally Posted by SSCULLY
What does this prove ?


You proved that K&N did not design a filter to filter smoke.
- Don't use it for respirator mask media when entering a burning house.
Was there something else you were trying to show with this test ?
The test proves how much better the filtration is with OEM paper filter!
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2012 | 07:50 AM
  #26  
jbrew's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 25,641
Likes: 19
From: MI
Originally Posted by AJUSA.com
K&N Air Filters Worth It?
Absolutely not. Unless you don't give a frogs fat *** about your motor. If that's the case, use one, -along w/Fram everywhere else.
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2012 | 08:52 AM
  #27  
aussiekeeper's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 991
Likes: 1
From: Sierra Vista, Az.
^^^^And there ya' go.......As stated in my earlier post, K&N filters were allowing dirt to pit the turbo wheels in the diesels. The stock filter never did.
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2012 | 09:25 AM
  #28  
ryanwagner78's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
From: Annapolis
FWIW: from my experience with performance cars and vehicles (ex: GT500, 911, M3, 350Z) I've found that you can't simply change one element, there is really no point. It has to be part of a plan. For example, SCT Tuner + Intake + Exhaust. Doing parts independently really gains you nothing and putting an intake on specifically, or a filter for that matter, really offers you nothing without tuning a vehicle. My opinion comes from years of track, dyno and other build experience. This is all my opinion..so take it for what its worth.
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2012 | 09:27 AM
  #29  
SSCULLY's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,511
Likes: 10
From: Under the flightpath of old ORD 22R
Originally Posted by Takeda
The test proves how much better the filtration is with OEM paper filter!
How much better the filtration is for smoke.
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2012 | 10:20 AM
  #30  
jbrew's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 25,641
Likes: 19
From: MI
Yea, the only REAL filter, - more less an improved media filter that follows the OEM design, - from Amsoil. I run one and they're quite a bit better. Nano media.

I haven't seen those for the 04 + yet. I bet they have them by now.. (?)
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:34 AM.