Low end torque loss with Magnaflow kits?
http://www.mustang50magazine.com/tec...o_numbers.html
I think your full of poopy. Now stick this in your pipe and suck, I mean smoke it!

http://www.mustang50magazine.com/tec...o_numbers.html
http://www.mustang50magazine.com/tec...o_numbers.html
I have stated that the last two trucks I had both loss low end and mpg's. Did I pick up top end/peak numbers? Maybe, but if I drove in that range all day I wouldn't be hanging out on an F150 forum. Show me a dyno of stock exhaust vs catback only and lets see the low end numbers.
What exactly am I smoking? A link to a test of mufflers that only gives peak hp/tq numbers? Nothing relevant to the discussion.
I have stated that the last two trucks I had both loss low end and mpg's. Did I pick up top end/peak numbers? Maybe, but if I drove in that range all day I wouldn't be hanging out on an F150 forum. Show me a dyno of stock exhaust vs catback only and lets see the low end numbers.

I have stated that the last two trucks I had both loss low end and mpg's. Did I pick up top end/peak numbers? Maybe, but if I drove in that range all day I wouldn't be hanging out on an F150 forum. Show me a dyno of stock exhaust vs catback only and lets see the low end numbers.

Anyway, if I believed anything a manufacture posted about HP/TQ gains I would be running a Flowmaster kit. Just check the link below, they make 300 hp just by adding their kit.

http://www.flowmastermufflers.com/dy...17417_Dyno.pdf
BTW - If anyone really does believe manufactures performance claims, I suggest you get this product. 13HP and 24% better MPGS for a few bucks!!
http://www.asseenontv.com/prod-pages...fuelsaver.html
Just so ya know, my system was mandrel bent.
No weeping needed.. If you were not trying to make your point, you would laugh me off the site for trying to use a manufactures claims to justify performance increases. Either way, graph still doesnt show lowend data.
Anyway, if I believed anything a manufacture posted about HP/TQ gains I would be running a Flowmaster kit. Just check the link below, they make 300 hp just by adding their kit.

http://www.flowmastermufflers.com/dy...17417_Dyno.pdf
BTW - If anyone really does believe manufactures performance claims, I suggest you get this product. 13HP and 24% better MPGS for a few bucks!!
http://www.asseenontv.com/prod-pages...fuelsaver.html
Anyway, if I believed anything a manufacture posted about HP/TQ gains I would be running a Flowmaster kit. Just check the link below, they make 300 hp just by adding their kit.

http://www.flowmastermufflers.com/dy...17417_Dyno.pdf
BTW - If anyone really does believe manufactures performance claims, I suggest you get this product. 13HP and 24% better MPGS for a few bucks!!
http://www.asseenontv.com/prod-pages...fuelsaver.html
Well at least you have good taste in wheels. 
It's common knowledge that a free flowing aftermarket exhaust increases HP and fuel mileage. My Roush Off Road exhaust did. Just like 1+1=2. It really is that simple.

It's common knowledge that a free flowing aftermarket exhaust increases HP and fuel mileage. My Roush Off Road exhaust did. Just like 1+1=2. It really is that simple.
I experienced no low end torque loss either.
You will not lose any low end torque with this kit. The 2.5" vs 2.25" argument is for true duals, not a simple cat-back. You might gain a bit of power and torque, but the bottleneck will be the Y-pipe and intermediate pipe.
EDIT: You always lose power with chambered mufflers (Flowmaster, Cherry Bomb, Thrush) but never with straight-through mufflers (Magnaflow, Borla, Corsa, Bullets).
EDIT: You always lose power with chambered mufflers (Flowmaster, Cherry Bomb, Thrush) but never with straight-through mufflers (Magnaflow, Borla, Corsa, Bullets).



