Edelbrock vs Dynomax UltraFlow

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-15-2004, 08:54 PM
jpony645's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Edelbrock vs Dynomax UltraFlow

I'm looking for something a little louder than the super huge stock muffler on my truck. Has anyone heard/used either of these mufflers? The ultraflow is supposed to be a race muffler so it may be too much but I'm sticking to the stock 2 in 1 exhaust and changing to a better muffler.
 
  #2  
Old 12-16-2004, 10:02 AM
max mitchell's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 4,761
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'll comment on the Ultraflow. I had one on my 2000 5.4 F-150 for 4 years. If you're looking for a little louder than stock, don't get this muffler. It's a throaty, muscle car sound that you can hear from a block away at certain rpms. Many recommend a straight-through design muffler on these trucks for increased power. Quiet versions include the longer Magnaflow and the Borla. You're not likely to get much feedback on the Edelbrock.
 
  #3  
Old 12-16-2004, 09:06 PM
shtrdave's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Southwest PA
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had the Dynomax system on my 99 ec and I replace the original muffler in the kit with a welded Ultraflo #17220 it had a nice sound and wasn't loud at all.
 



Quick Reply: Edelbrock vs Dynomax UltraFlow



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:49 PM.