got it dyno tuned are these good numbers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 7, 2014 | 10:37 PM
  #16  
dranger962000's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: colorado
Name:  CAM00166_zpsu252obx5.jpg
Views: 88
Size:  85.7 KB
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2014 | 10:46 PM
  #17  
dranger962000's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: colorado
i have a scan gauge 2 also i will see what it says on there but i think the last time i tried that it said around 260 which would be at the crank not at the tires
it does feel like it has more power i went and picked this up yesterday and when i was towing it i thought that it didnt feel that heavy... i pulled on the scale at my work and grossed 13800
Name:  CAM00159_zps8xcybwtk.jpg
Views: 89
Size:  113.8 KB
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2014 | 09:00 AM
  #18  
cheef's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 818
Likes: 1
From: ONTARIO
Nice rig and nice gains!!
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2014 | 11:57 AM
  #19  
DiabloMike's Avatar
Former Sponsor
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: so fla
Looks good.

The 75 ft/lbs seems like a variance, the tuned pull was started much earlier, and got a nice converter spike, but the gains are solid none-the-less.

Enjoy.
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2014 | 01:46 PM
  #20  
BROTHERDAVE's Avatar
Senior Member
25 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,759
Likes: 4
From: Friendswood Texas
nice across the board gains, but to me it looks like a 25 to 30 ft lb torque increase, which seem about right.

thanks for sharing. i wish more people put the information out there.
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2014 | 11:19 PM
  #21  
dranger962000's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: colorado
i tried the hp rating from the scangauge on my way to work the highest i got was 293... not sure that means anything but its higher than what it read before i was rhomping on it pretty good and the more i drive it the more i like how its running it really pulls good!!
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2014 | 11:24 PM
  #22  
dranger962000's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: colorado
now that i think about it he made me a second tune for if i want to run 91 octane and feeling how it runs now i might try it i didnt really want to spend more on fuel but now im curious
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2014 | 11:45 AM
  #23  
timmypstyle's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 1
From: CO
Yeah I've been thinking about my 93 performance tune but colorado is 91 octane which should be ok but with my 87 performance tune I use 87 instead of 85 because I feel 85 just doesn't seem right for it. I asked justin at vmptuning and he said I could use either one so I've stuck with 87. The pain for me is doing the tire rotation setting since it took me like 5 times to get it right last time. Also my truck has always had the tach dive down every so often at idle, even before the tune. It will hit like 400 rpms and pop back up. It has stalled twice in the 90k since new I've had it. I raised the idle speed I think 150 so and it still dives down but never stalls.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:14 AM.