Unichip Plug 'n Play review

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 11, 2013 | 12:05 PM
  #16  
Patman's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,337
Likes: 159
From: DFW
Even if its "only" 55hp that's pretty big gains, you're talking about adding. Over 15% more power!

OP do you even know what the sensors are that the device plugged into? That may give us better idea of what's going on here.

From what I've heard, the instructions that it comes with are sub-par
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2013 | 12:06 PM
  #17  
KingRanchCoy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,480
Likes: 6
From: San Angelo, TX
Originally Posted by DewserB
Right on queue.
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2013 | 12:09 PM
  #18  
Patman's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,337
Likes: 159
From: DFW
Originally Posted by Casey05
Dewser, I respect your opinion, but that is not THE only way to tune a truck. I personally have had several custom tuners over the years, across different vehicles. I'm always worried about reflashing the ecu and having something happen at an inopportune moment, and end up bricking the ecu. This is a way of not doing just that.
So instead of tuning, you're manipulating sensor data going into the PCM. Tricking it into behaving in a different manner. Sounds like a much better way of doing it
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2013 | 12:14 PM
  #19  
KingRanchCoy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,480
Likes: 6
From: San Angelo, TX
Originally Posted by Patman

From what I've heard, the instructions that it comes with are sub-par
The instructions was decent, i had problems at first but i also had my 3 year old son "helping" so i wasnt able to fully concentrate ..

One thing that would be nice is to know what sensors you are plugging into and maybe a little bigger pictures.. Some of us like to look at pics instead of reeding
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2013 | 12:19 PM
  #20  
Casey05's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
From: Mukilteo, WA
You plug into one coil pack, the MAF sensor, and I believe the MAP sensor. I have pictures, but im on my tablet right now, so it's hard to post.
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2013 | 12:25 PM
  #21  
DewserB's Avatar
TRUCK OF THE YEAR 2013
Truck of the Month
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,176
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Originally Posted by Patman
So instead of tuning, you're manipulating sensor data going into the PCM. Tricking it into behaving in a different manner. Sounds like a much better way of doing it
Bingo!

The second I saw that the "chip" plugs into various sensors, etc, I thought this is definitely not the best way to "tune".

Casey, sure. The reputable tuners using reputable devices aren't the "only" way to tune, but does this "chip" that basically just tricks the sensors even qualify as tuning?

That's the message I was trying to convey earlier. Are there other programmers besides 5 star? Sure. But reputable companies, regardless of who they are, using reputable programming on reputable devices - all capable of comprehensive data logging - are, in my opinion, the safest and most effective means of tuning a vehicle.
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2013 | 12:29 PM
  #22  
DewserB's Avatar
TRUCK OF THE YEAR 2013
Truck of the Month
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,176
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Originally Posted by Casey05
You plug into one coil pack, the MAF sensor, and I believe the MAP sensor. I have pictures, but im on my tablet right now, so it's hard to post.
Seriously, Casey...if I were you, I'd unplug that crap and never reinstall it again. Then if yer still itchin' fer more performance, call one of the reputable fellers and have them fix you up with a device capable of custom tunes, data logging, etc.

But it's yer truck and yer money.
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2013 | 12:41 PM
  #23  
Casey05's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
From: Mukilteo, WA
Dewser, I actually did call two different tuners last year to purchase a custom tune. I won't name names, but one didn't return my call after several attempts, and the other kept blowing me off, saying he woukd have someone call me back to take my info. I literally had my credit card in my hand ready to buy. I got frustrated and busy, so never got back to it.

I may eventually go with something else, but not until the next truck.
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2013 | 12:42 PM
  #24  
DewserB's Avatar
TRUCK OF THE YEAR 2013
Truck of the Month
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,176
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
This Unichip setup (how it connects to sensors and "tricks" the factory PCM) really reminds me of this: https://www.f150online.com/forums/ch...ml#post4727245

Be sure to click on the links provided within the thread as well.

Remember that one?

Another dead giveaway that what Jack is peddlin' ain't even a tuner or programmer is his own claim that it leaves "no footprint". I'm sure it doesn't. However, every single true programming or tuning device worth having WILL leave a footprint because it's actually programming! Tuners/programmers who claim no footprint or trace is left are either severely misinformed, lying, or telling the truth because their "device" actually does no tuning or programming...just "tricking".
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2013 | 12:47 PM
  #25  
DewserB's Avatar
TRUCK OF THE YEAR 2013
Truck of the Month
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,176
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Originally Posted by Casey05
Dewser, I actually did call two different tuners last year to purchase a custom tune. I won't name names, but one didn't return my call after several attempts, and the other kept blowing me off, saying he woukd have someone call me back to take my info. I literally had my credit card in my hand ready to buy. I got frustrated and busy, so never got back to it.

I may eventually go with something else, but not until the next truck.
I've had the issue you explained with PHP but never with 5 star. Every single time I've called, he answers on the first couple of rings and is ready and helpful for anything I'd ask or need.

Well, I tried. Looks like your siggy line rings truer than I thought!

Good luck. If you keep that stuff hooked up to yer current truck, you may be in "the next truck" sooner than expected. I sincerely hope not.

 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2013 | 12:55 PM
  #26  
Casey05's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
From: Mukilteo, WA
Originally Posted by DewserB

Well, I tried. Looks like your siggy line rings truer than I thought!
Lol

Thank you for the discussion, hopefully Jack will pipe in at some point. Please keep in mind, he simply asked us to install and review our experience with the product. I don't have any other vested intrest in the product.

Oh and go Seahawks!
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2013 | 01:22 PM
  #27  
Patman's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,337
Likes: 159
From: DFW
Originally Posted by DewserB
This Unichip setup (how it connects to sensors and "tricks" the factory PCM) really reminds me of this: https://www.f150online.com/forums/ch...ml#post4727245

Be sure to click on the links provided within the thread as well.

Remember that one?

Another dead giveaway that what Jack is peddlin' ain't even a tuner or programmer is his own claim that it leaves "no footprint". I'm sure it doesn't. However, every single true programming or tuning device worth having WILL leave a footprint because it's actually programming! Tuners/programmers who claim no footprint or trace is left are either severely misinformed, lying, or telling the truth because their "device" actually does no tuning or programming...just "tricking".

I've seen first hand someone that added a MAF reistor device on his 01 Range Rover. The vehicle though it had more air coming in than it really did, in a heavy load situation adding excess fuel is not what you want. Well long story short, his MAF readings were off the chart, and ended up developing a rod knock and lost compression on one cylinder after if washed the intake valve seats.

It might not show up as altered PCM tune file, but any qualified tech can read the altered sensor data and see its effects. Just because it doesn't have a "digital footprint" doesn't mean that the effects can't be seen mechanically inside the engine
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2013 | 02:25 PM
  #28  
DewserB's Avatar
TRUCK OF THE YEAR 2013
Truck of the Month
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,176
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Originally Posted by Patman
I've seen first hand someone that added a MAF reistor device on his 01 Range Rover. The vehicle though it had more air coming in than it really did, in a heavy load situation adding excess fuel is not what you want. Well long story short, his MAF readings were off the chart, and ended up developing a rod knock and lost compression on one cylinder after if washed the intake valve seats.

It might not show up as altered PCM tune file, but any qualified tech can read the altered sensor data and see its effects. Just because it doesn't have a "digital footprint" doesn't mean that the effects can't be seen mechanically inside the engine
That's exactly the kind of damage that I'd be afraid of with a setup the tricks the sensors.

I wonder if the skewed sensor data could be construed as a failing sensor instead of intentional skewing. I bet it would be hard to prove one way or the other. Maybe?

Originally Posted by Casey05
Please keep in mind, he simply asked us to install and review our experience with the product.
Does "us" mean you and Coy?

Originally Posted by Casey05
Oh and go Seahawks!
Go Ducks! (And Vols... )
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2013 | 02:33 PM
  #29  
Casey05's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
From: Mukilteo, WA
I assume he asked Coy the same thing. I shouldn't include him though, so let me refraise, I was asked to install and review my experience with the product.

Happy Friday.
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2013 | 02:50 PM
  #30  
KingRanchCoy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,480
Likes: 6
From: San Angelo, TX
Originally Posted by Casey05
I assume he asked Coy the same thing. I shouldn't include him though, so let me refraise, I was asked to install and review my experience with the product.

Happy Friday.
Yup he asked me to do the same.

I decided to just post on Casey thread instead of making a new one.

I just gave my first impressions, as most of yal know i drive ALOT.. (14,800 miles on my truck bought in April) So in the coming weeks i will be honest and say what i like and dont like.. My review was just after 50 miles max.. Have no idea about fuel mileage or anything like that yet..

I will say though, since i have gotten my truck it always has black smoke on the first start up of the day.. With the Unichip it doesnt smoke, now is that good or bad? I dont know

Casey i found your thread on the "other" forum.. I decided to chime in on that one too. Hope thats ok with you.
 

Last edited by KingRanchCoy; Oct 11, 2013 at 02:52 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:16 AM.